Dynamic quarantine of Internet worms

Cynthia Wong, Chenxi Wang, D. Song, Stan Bielski, G. Ganger
{"title":"Dynamic quarantine of Internet worms","authors":"Cynthia Wong, Chenxi Wang, D. Song, Stan Bielski, G. Ganger","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2004.1311878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If we limit the contact rate of worm traffic, can we alleviate and ultimately contain Internet worms? This paper sets out to answer this question. Specifically, we are interested in analyzing different deployment strategies of rate control mechanisms and the effect thereof on suppressing the spread of worm code. We use both analytical models and simulation experiments. We find that rate control at individual hosts or edge routers yields a slowdown that is linear in the number of hosts (or routers) with the rate limiting filters. Limiting contact rate at the backbone routers, however, is substantially more effective-it renders a slowdown comparable to deploying rate limiting filters at every individual host that is covered. This result holds true even when susceptible and infected hosts are patched and immunized dynamically. To provide context for our analysis, we examine real traffic traces obtained from a campus computing network. We observe that rate throttling could be enforced with minimal impact on legitimate communications. Two worms observed in the traces, however, would be significantly slowed down.","PeriodicalId":436323,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2004","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2004","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2004.1311878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

If we limit the contact rate of worm traffic, can we alleviate and ultimately contain Internet worms? This paper sets out to answer this question. Specifically, we are interested in analyzing different deployment strategies of rate control mechanisms and the effect thereof on suppressing the spread of worm code. We use both analytical models and simulation experiments. We find that rate control at individual hosts or edge routers yields a slowdown that is linear in the number of hosts (or routers) with the rate limiting filters. Limiting contact rate at the backbone routers, however, is substantially more effective-it renders a slowdown comparable to deploying rate limiting filters at every individual host that is covered. This result holds true even when susceptible and infected hosts are patched and immunized dynamically. To provide context for our analysis, we examine real traffic traces obtained from a campus computing network. We observe that rate throttling could be enforced with minimal impact on legitimate communications. Two worms observed in the traces, however, would be significantly slowed down.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互联网蠕虫的动态隔离
如果我们限制蠕虫流量的接触率,我们能减轻并最终遏制互联网蠕虫吗?本文试图回答这个问题。具体来说,我们感兴趣的是分析速率控制机制的不同部署策略及其对抑制蠕虫代码传播的影响。我们使用了分析模型和模拟实验。我们发现,在单个主机或边缘路由器上的速率控制产生的减速与速率限制过滤器的主机(或路由器)数量呈线性关系。然而,在骨干路由器上限制接触速率实际上更有效——它带来的减速与在覆盖的每个单独的主机上部署速率限制过滤器相当。即使在易感和受感染的宿主被动态修补和免疫时,这一结果也成立。为了为我们的分析提供背景,我们检查了从校园计算网络获得的真实流量轨迹。我们观察到,费率限制可以在对合法通信影响最小的情况下实施。然而,在痕迹中观察到的两种蠕虫的速度会明显减慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of dynamic power management on the functionality and the performance of battery-powered appliances Improving system dependability with functional alternatives Benchmarking the dependability of Windows NT4, 2000 and XP An SLA-oriented capacity planning tool for streaming media services Caching-enhanced scalable reliable multicast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1