Overhead Labour and Skill-Biased Technological Change: The Role of Product Diversification

Choong-Hyun Nam
{"title":"Overhead Labour and Skill-Biased Technological Change: The Role of Product Diversification","authors":"Choong-Hyun Nam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3367933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the literature on skill-biased technological change views both skilled and unskilled labour as variable inputs. In contrast, this study focuses on the role of skilled workers comprising overhead labour in the recent increase in skill demand. The first chapter focuses on the aggregate shift in skill demand, while succeeding chapters focus on the heterogeneity of this demand across firms. \n \nIn the first chapter, I argue that the transition from Ford-style mass production toward mass customization in the 1980s may be responsible for the increase in skill demand since introducing new goods requires fixed labour input, which is biased towards skilled workers. I present a dynamic general equilibrium model, which explains both the rapid growth in skill demand since the 1980s and the recent puzzling slowdown since the late 1990s. However, as the ratio of fixed to variable inputs cannot increase indefinfinitely, my model also predicts that the growth in skill demand will slow down in the long run. \n \nIn the second chapter, using UK manufacturing data, I show that the employment share of non-production workers is positively correlated with firm size but negatively correlated with the latter over time. I argue that this serves as evidence for the existence of (partially) fixed skilled labour, with the premise being that firms with larger fixed input are both larger in size and have a higher share of non-production workers. However, short-run output expansion only increases variable labour, and therefore it decreases the employment share of non-production workers. \n \nIn the third chapter, I present a second piece of evidence in support of the main thesis of this dissertation. I show that exiting firms as well as entering firms have a higher share of non-production workers in UK manufacturing industries. This phenomenon is rather puzzling as exiting firms have lower labour productivity, but nevertheless the finding presents itself as being consistent with the contention of this study that skilled workers constitute an overhead labour input.","PeriodicalId":287196,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3367933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most of the literature on skill-biased technological change views both skilled and unskilled labour as variable inputs. In contrast, this study focuses on the role of skilled workers comprising overhead labour in the recent increase in skill demand. The first chapter focuses on the aggregate shift in skill demand, while succeeding chapters focus on the heterogeneity of this demand across firms. In the first chapter, I argue that the transition from Ford-style mass production toward mass customization in the 1980s may be responsible for the increase in skill demand since introducing new goods requires fixed labour input, which is biased towards skilled workers. I present a dynamic general equilibrium model, which explains both the rapid growth in skill demand since the 1980s and the recent puzzling slowdown since the late 1990s. However, as the ratio of fixed to variable inputs cannot increase indefinfinitely, my model also predicts that the growth in skill demand will slow down in the long run. In the second chapter, using UK manufacturing data, I show that the employment share of non-production workers is positively correlated with firm size but negatively correlated with the latter over time. I argue that this serves as evidence for the existence of (partially) fixed skilled labour, with the premise being that firms with larger fixed input are both larger in size and have a higher share of non-production workers. However, short-run output expansion only increases variable labour, and therefore it decreases the employment share of non-production workers. In the third chapter, I present a second piece of evidence in support of the main thesis of this dissertation. I show that exiting firms as well as entering firms have a higher share of non-production workers in UK manufacturing industries. This phenomenon is rather puzzling as exiting firms have lower labour productivity, but nevertheless the finding presents itself as being consistent with the contention of this study that skilled workers constitute an overhead labour input.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间接劳动与技能偏向的技术变革:产品多样化的作用
大多数关于技能偏向的技术变革的文献都将熟练劳动力和非熟练劳动力视为可变投入。相比之下,本研究侧重于技术工人的作用,包括间接劳动力在最近的技能需求增加。第一章关注的是技能需求的总体变化,随后的章节关注的是企业间这种需求的异质性。在第一章中,我认为20世纪80年代从福特式的大规模生产向大规模定制的转变可能是技能需求增加的原因,因为引入新产品需要固定的劳动力投入,这对熟练工人是有偏见的。我提出了一个动态一般均衡模型,它既解释了上世纪80年代以来技能需求的快速增长,也解释了上世纪90年代末以来令人费解的技能需求放缓。然而,由于固定投入与可变投入的比例不能无限增加,我的模型还预测,从长期来看,技能需求的增长将放缓。在第二章中,我使用英国制造业数据表明,非生产工人的就业份额与企业规模呈正相关,但随着时间的推移,与后者呈负相关。我认为,这可以作为(部分)固定技术劳动力存在的证据,前提是固定投入较大的企业规模更大,非生产工人的比例也更高。然而,短期产出扩张只增加了可变劳动力,因此减少了非生产工人的就业份额。在第三章中,我提出了第二个证据来支持本文的主要论点。我表明,在英国制造业中,退出企业和进入企业的非生产工人所占比例更高。这一现象相当令人费解,因为退出的企业劳动生产率较低,但尽管如此,这一发现与本研究的论点一致,即技术工人构成间接劳动投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overhead Labour and Skill-Biased Technological Change: The Role of Product Diversification Technology, Inequality, and Aggregate Demand Medium Frequency Cycles, Global Imbalances, and the Puzzles of Open Economy Macroeconomics. The Macroeconomics of Central Bank Issued Digital Currencies Short- and Long-Run Tradeoff Monetary Easing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1