A unifying framework for the definition of syntactic measures over conceptual schema diagrams

D. Costal, Xavier Franch
{"title":"A unifying framework for the definition of syntactic measures over conceptual schema diagrams","authors":"D. Costal, Xavier Franch","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2012.6240423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many approaches that propose the use of measures for assessing the quality of conceptual schemas. Many of these measures focus purely on the syntactic aspects of the conceptual schema diagrams, e.g. their size, their shape, etc. Similarities among different measures may be found both at the intra-model level (i.e., several measures over the same type of diagram are defined following the same layout) and at the intermodel level (i.e., measures over different types of diagrams are similar considering an appropriate metaschema correspondence). In this paper we analyse these similarities for a particular family of diagrams used in conceptual modelling, those that can be ultimately seen as a combination of nodes and edges of different types. We propose a unifying measuring framework for this family to facilitate the measure definition process and illustrate its application on a particular type, namely business process diagrams.","PeriodicalId":130476,"journal":{"name":"2012 Sixth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","volume":"33 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Sixth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2012.6240423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are many approaches that propose the use of measures for assessing the quality of conceptual schemas. Many of these measures focus purely on the syntactic aspects of the conceptual schema diagrams, e.g. their size, their shape, etc. Similarities among different measures may be found both at the intra-model level (i.e., several measures over the same type of diagram are defined following the same layout) and at the intermodel level (i.e., measures over different types of diagrams are similar considering an appropriate metaschema correspondence). In this paper we analyse these similarities for a particular family of diagrams used in conceptual modelling, those that can be ultimately seen as a combination of nodes and edges of different types. We propose a unifying measuring framework for this family to facilitate the measure definition process and illustrate its application on a particular type, namely business process diagrams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在概念模式图上定义语法度量的统一框架
有许多方法建议使用度量来评估概念图式的质量。这些方法中有许多只关注于概念图式图的语法方面,例如它们的大小、形状等等。不同度量之间的相似性可以在模型内级别(即,相同类型图上的几个度量是按照相同的布局定义的)和模型间级别(即,考虑到适当的元结构对应,不同类型图上的度量是相似的)找到。在本文中,我们分析了概念建模中使用的一组特定图的这些相似性,这些图最终可以被视为不同类型的节点和边的组合。我们为这个系列提出了一个统一的度量框架,以促进度量定义过程,并说明其在特定类型(即业务流程图)上的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The i∗ framework: The way ahead Conceptual meta-environment for Deaf children Literacy challenge: How to design effective Artifacts for bilingualism construction Human genome conceptual modeling: An ontological framework for the design and implementation of genomic Information Systems Dealing with trust and control: A meta-model for trustworthy information systems development Applying transdisciplinarity principles in the information services co-creation process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1