An empirical evaluation of three popular meta-heuristics for solving Travelling Salesman Problem

A. Agrawal, Arvinder Kaur
{"title":"An empirical evaluation of three popular meta-heuristics for solving Travelling Salesman Problem","authors":"A. Agrawal, Arvinder Kaur","doi":"10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2016.7508040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaheuristic algorithms are applied in various fields to solve realistic problems. In many situations, a researcher moves in perplexed situation when it comes to selection of an appropriate metaheuristic algorithm for any specific problem. To overcome from such situation a comparative study is must. Considering this view we have done the performance evaluations of three popular metaheuristic algorithms: Evolution Strategy, Tabu Search and Variable Neighborhood Search. We framed three research questions to evaluate our hypothesis. Extensive experiments are conducted and results are collected. It was observed that Variable Neighborhood Search approach performed far better than other approaches. But this result seems insufficient in presenting some conclusion. Therefore, various statistical tests such as F-test, Post-hoc tests were performed. An obvious outcome of this study is that there is an interaction effect between the problem sizes and the metaheuristic used and no clear superiority of one metaheuristic over the other.","PeriodicalId":299044,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th International Conference - Cloud System and Big Data Engineering (Confluence)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th International Conference - Cloud System and Big Data Engineering (Confluence)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2016.7508040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Metaheuristic algorithms are applied in various fields to solve realistic problems. In many situations, a researcher moves in perplexed situation when it comes to selection of an appropriate metaheuristic algorithm for any specific problem. To overcome from such situation a comparative study is must. Considering this view we have done the performance evaluations of three popular metaheuristic algorithms: Evolution Strategy, Tabu Search and Variable Neighborhood Search. We framed three research questions to evaluate our hypothesis. Extensive experiments are conducted and results are collected. It was observed that Variable Neighborhood Search approach performed far better than other approaches. But this result seems insufficient in presenting some conclusion. Therefore, various statistical tests such as F-test, Post-hoc tests were performed. An obvious outcome of this study is that there is an interaction effect between the problem sizes and the metaheuristic used and no clear superiority of one metaheuristic over the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求解旅行推销员问题的三种常用元启发式方法的实证评价
元启发式算法被应用于各个领域来解决现实问题。在许多情况下,当涉及到为任何特定问题选择合适的元启发式算法时,研究人员会陷入困惑的境地。要克服这种情况,就必须进行比较研究。考虑到这一观点,我们对三种流行的元启发式算法:进化策略、禁忌搜索和变量邻域搜索进行了性能评估。我们提出了三个研究问题来评估我们的假设。进行了大量的实验并收集了结果。结果表明,变邻域搜索方法的性能明显优于其他方法。但是这个结果似乎不足以给出一些结论。因此,进行了各种统计检验,如f检验、事后检验等。本研究的一个明显结果是,问题大小和所使用的元启发式之间存在交互效应,并且一种元启发式不明显优于另一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big Data capabilities and readiness of South African retail organisations Heuristic model to improve Feature Selection based on Machine Learning in Data Mining Image processing based degraded camera captured document enhancement for improved OCR accuracy Development of IoT based smart security and monitoring devices for agriculture A comprehensive study on Facial Expressions Recognition Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1