Maurizio Ferraris' Theory of Documentality and Social Media: Media Hacking as Hacking of Cultural Memory

S. Tikhonova
{"title":"Maurizio Ferraris' Theory of Documentality and Social Media: Media Hacking as Hacking of Cultural Memory","authors":"S. Tikhonova","doi":"10.46539/gmd.v4i2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the methodological search for overcoming dualism in the understanding of cultural memory as a basic category of memory studies. This category implies a gap between the memory of living contemporaries and the \"dead\" memory of institutional narratives. However, the rebellion of living memory against repressive censored texts is a feature of mass industrial societies. The model of confrontation between generational memory and trans-generational memory, laid down by the works of M. Halbwachs and J. Assmann, loses its heuristic in the conditions of the dominance of digital media. The author suggests using the social ontology of M. Ferraris, known as the “theory of documentality”, to overcome this gap. The interpretation of sociogenesis as a result of the formation of social objects based on the recording procedure allows us to rethink the social function of the media. Cultural memory in the theory of Ferraris is equivalent to an array of documentary, differentiated by the ability to generate and maintain social objects into strong and weak. This approach turns out to be productive where the “great gaps” of communication have been overcome, where the social communication system provides wide access to all its types. Social media provides new memory formats by incorporating people and non-human algorithms into its networks. Creation of social memory objects no longer requires specialized institutions; “old”, pre-digital narratives of historical memory are hacked by users in media hacking processes, allowing them to appropriate, edit and inhabit the history of society in personal digital memory strategies. At the same time, the digital nature of new social objects ensures their involvement with each other through social network algorithms, regardless of their own ethical, aesthetic or axiological status.","PeriodicalId":393706,"journal":{"name":"Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v4i2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the methodological search for overcoming dualism in the understanding of cultural memory as a basic category of memory studies. This category implies a gap between the memory of living contemporaries and the "dead" memory of institutional narratives. However, the rebellion of living memory against repressive censored texts is a feature of mass industrial societies. The model of confrontation between generational memory and trans-generational memory, laid down by the works of M. Halbwachs and J. Assmann, loses its heuristic in the conditions of the dominance of digital media. The author suggests using the social ontology of M. Ferraris, known as the “theory of documentality”, to overcome this gap. The interpretation of sociogenesis as a result of the formation of social objects based on the recording procedure allows us to rethink the social function of the media. Cultural memory in the theory of Ferraris is equivalent to an array of documentary, differentiated by the ability to generate and maintain social objects into strong and weak. This approach turns out to be productive where the “great gaps” of communication have been overcome, where the social communication system provides wide access to all its types. Social media provides new memory formats by incorporating people and non-human algorithms into its networks. Creation of social memory objects no longer requires specialized institutions; “old”, pre-digital narratives of historical memory are hacked by users in media hacking processes, allowing them to appropriate, edit and inhabit the history of society in personal digital memory strategies. At the same time, the digital nature of new social objects ensures their involvement with each other through social network algorithms, regardless of their own ethical, aesthetic or axiological status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫里齐奥·费拉利斯的文献性理论与社会媒体:媒介黑客作为文化记忆的黑客
作为记忆研究的一个基本范畴,本文探讨了克服文化记忆理解二元论的方法论探索。这一范畴暗示了当代活着的记忆与制度叙事的“死亡”记忆之间的差距。然而,活生生的记忆对压制性审查文本的反抗是大众工业社会的一个特征。哈尔布瓦克斯(M. Halbwachs)和阿斯曼(J. Assmann)的作品所确立的代际记忆和跨代记忆的对抗模式,在数字媒体占主导地位的条件下失去了启发性。笔者建议利用法拉利斯的社会本体论,即“文献性理论”来克服这一差距。基于记录过程对社会客体形成的社会发生的解释,让我们重新思考媒介的社会功能。法拉利理论中的文化记忆相当于一组纪录片,以产生和维持社会客体的能力区分为强与弱。在沟通的“巨大差距”已经被克服的地方,在社会沟通系统提供所有类型的广泛访问的地方,这种方法被证明是富有成效的。社交媒体通过将人和非人类算法纳入其网络,提供了新的记忆格式。社会记忆对象的创造不再需要专门的机构;“旧的”、前数字化的历史记忆叙事在媒体黑客过程中被用户入侵,使他们能够在个人数字记忆策略中挪用、编辑和栖居社会历史。与此同时,新的社会对象的数字性质确保了它们通过社交网络算法相互参与,而不管它们自己的伦理、美学或价值论地位如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Prospects for the Development of Territorial Branding in the Context of the Experience Economy Beyond Usability: A Critical Analysis of Interface Research Asymmetry of Screen and Book Culture Descartes and the Irrational Mediatization of School Shooting (Сolumbine) in Fan Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1