Critical Thinking Skills and Preferred Learning Styles of Gifted Students at the Secondary Stage in Taif Governorate

Badrya Alotaibi, A. Alarfaj
{"title":"Critical Thinking Skills and Preferred Learning Styles of Gifted Students at the Secondary Stage in Taif Governorate","authors":"Badrya Alotaibi, A. Alarfaj","doi":"10.54940/ep64236189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to identify the level of critical thinking skills and the preferred learning styles of gifted students at the secondary stage in Taif Governorate, in addition to revealing the differences in critical thinking skills according to their different preferred learning styles and their gender. The sample of the study consisted of (192) male and female secondary school students in Taif Governorate schools, distributed by gender into (92) male and (100) female students. The Saudi short form of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory were used after verifying their psychometric properties to collect data from the subjects. The results revealed a low level of gifted students’ possession of critical thinking skills in general, and in particular the deduction skill. The results also revealed that there is a rate of (16.67%) gifted students who did not show preference of a specific learning style, and that the most preferred learning style was the divergent style, followed by the accommodator style, then the convergent style, and finally the assimilator style. The results also showed a statistically significant mean score differences attributed to gender on three subtests of the critical thinking test as well as the total score on the test as males outperformed females in the conclusion subtest while females outperformed males in the induction, evaluation of arguments, and the overall mean scores. The results also revealed a statis-tically significant mean score differences on all subtests as well as the overall mean score attributed to the preferred learning style in favor of the divergent style followed by the assimilator style, then the accommodator style, and finally the convergent style.","PeriodicalId":402392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","volume":"11 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep64236189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the level of critical thinking skills and the preferred learning styles of gifted students at the secondary stage in Taif Governorate, in addition to revealing the differences in critical thinking skills according to their different preferred learning styles and their gender. The sample of the study consisted of (192) male and female secondary school students in Taif Governorate schools, distributed by gender into (92) male and (100) female students. The Saudi short form of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory were used after verifying their psychometric properties to collect data from the subjects. The results revealed a low level of gifted students’ possession of critical thinking skills in general, and in particular the deduction skill. The results also revealed that there is a rate of (16.67%) gifted students who did not show preference of a specific learning style, and that the most preferred learning style was the divergent style, followed by the accommodator style, then the convergent style, and finally the assimilator style. The results also showed a statistically significant mean score differences attributed to gender on three subtests of the critical thinking test as well as the total score on the test as males outperformed females in the conclusion subtest while females outperformed males in the induction, evaluation of arguments, and the overall mean scores. The results also revealed a statis-tically significant mean score differences on all subtests as well as the overall mean score attributed to the preferred learning style in favor of the divergent style followed by the assimilator style, then the accommodator style, and finally the convergent style.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔伊夫省资优学生中学阶段的批判性思维能力和首选学习方式
本研究旨在确定塔伊夫省中学资优学生的批判性思维能力水平和偏好的学习方式,并揭示不同偏好的学习方式和性别在批判性思维能力方面的差异。本研究样本由塔伊夫省学校的(192)名男女中学生组成,按性别分为(92)名男生和(100)名女生。在验证了沃森-格拉泽批判性思维测试和科尔布学习风格量表的心理测量特性后,使用沙特简式沃森-格拉泽批判性思维测试和科尔布学习风格量表从受试者那里收集数据。结果显示,资优学生的批判性思维能力普遍较低,尤其是推理能力。结果还显示,有16.67%的资优学生对特定的学习风格没有偏好,最喜欢的学习风格是发散型,其次是迁就型,然后是收敛型,最后是同化型。结果还显示,在批判性思维测试的三个子测试以及测试的总分中,男性在结论子测试中表现优于女性,而女性在归纳、论点评价和总体平均分中表现优于男性,这在统计上也具有显著的性别差异。结果还显示,各子测试的平均得分以及首选学习风格的总体平均得分均有统计学意义上的差异,以发散式学习风格为主,其次是同化式学习风格,然后是容纳式学习风格,最后是收敛式学习风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Predictive Capacity of Academic Life Quality in Academic Identity Among Female Students at Umm Al-Qura University Organizational memory is an approach to achieving institutional excellence in Saudi universities in light of the experience of the United States of America (Proposed concept) Self-disclosure and its relationship to psychological immunity among non-Arabic-speaking students at Umm Al-Qura University in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Content Analysis of Saudi third intermediate Science textbook in the light of sustainable development dimensions The CEFR in a Saudi Classroom: Implications for Academic Labor in Language Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1