An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis of Six Sigma in service organizations in Singapore

A. Chakrabarty, T. Chuan
{"title":"An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis of Six Sigma in service organizations in Singapore","authors":"A. Chakrabarty, T. Chuan","doi":"10.1108/01409170910965224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework to facilitate widening the scope of Six Sigma implementation in service organizations. \n \nDesign/methodology/approach – Using grounded theory methodology, this study develops theory for Six Sigma implementation in service organizations. The study involves a questionnaire survey and case studies to understand and build a conceptual framework. The survey is conducted in service organizations in Singapore and is exploratory. The case studies involved three service organizations which implement Six Sigma. The objective is to explore and understand the issues highlighted by the survey and the literature. \n \nFindings – The findings confirm the inclusion of critical success factors, critical-to-quality characteristics, and set of tools and techniques as observed from the literature. In the case of key performance indicators (KPI), there are different interpretations about it in the literature and also by industry practitioners. Some literature explains KPIs as performance metrics whereas some feel it as key process input or output variables, which is similar to interpretations by practitioners of Six Sigma. The responses of “not relevant” and “unknown to us” as reasons for not implementing Six Sigma show the need for understanding specific requirements of service organizations. \n \nOriginality/value – Though much theoretical description is available about Six Sigma, there has been limited rigorous academic research on it. This gap is far more pronounced about Six Sigma implementation in service organizations, where the theory is not yet mature. Identifying this need, the paper contributes by going through theory building exercise and developing a conceptual framework to understand the issues involving its implementation in service organizations.","PeriodicalId":325346,"journal":{"name":"Management Research News","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910965224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework to facilitate widening the scope of Six Sigma implementation in service organizations. Design/methodology/approach – Using grounded theory methodology, this study develops theory for Six Sigma implementation in service organizations. The study involves a questionnaire survey and case studies to understand and build a conceptual framework. The survey is conducted in service organizations in Singapore and is exploratory. The case studies involved three service organizations which implement Six Sigma. The objective is to explore and understand the issues highlighted by the survey and the literature. Findings – The findings confirm the inclusion of critical success factors, critical-to-quality characteristics, and set of tools and techniques as observed from the literature. In the case of key performance indicators (KPI), there are different interpretations about it in the literature and also by industry practitioners. Some literature explains KPIs as performance metrics whereas some feel it as key process input or output variables, which is similar to interpretations by practitioners of Six Sigma. The responses of “not relevant” and “unknown to us” as reasons for not implementing Six Sigma show the need for understanding specific requirements of service organizations. Originality/value – Though much theoretical description is available about Six Sigma, there has been limited rigorous academic research on it. This gap is far more pronounced about Six Sigma implementation in service organizations, where the theory is not yet mature. Identifying this need, the paper contributes by going through theory building exercise and developing a conceptual framework to understand the issues involving its implementation in service organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡服务业组织六西格玛的探索性定性与定量分析
目的-本文的目的是开发一个概念性框架,以促进扩大六西格玛在服务组织实施的范围。设计/方法论/方法-运用扎根理论方法论,本研究开发了服务组织实施六西格玛的理论。本研究包括问卷调查和个案研究,以了解和建立一个概念框架。该调查是在新加坡的服务机构中进行的,是探索性的。案例研究涉及三个实施六西格玛的服务组织。目的是探索和理解调查和文献中突出的问题。研究结果-研究结果证实了从文献中观察到的关键成功因素、关键质量特征以及一套工具和技术。对于关键绩效指标(KPI),在文献和行业从业者中都有不同的解读。一些文献将kpi解释为绩效指标,而另一些则认为它是关键的过程输入或输出变量,这类似于六西格玛实践者的解释。“不相关”和“我们不知道”作为不实施六西格玛的原因的回答表明需要理解服务组织的特定需求。原创性/价值——虽然有很多关于六西格玛的理论描述,但对它的严格学术研究有限。这种差距在服务组织的六西格玛实施中更为明显,在那里理论还不成熟。确定了这一需求,本文通过理论构建练习和开发概念框架来理解服务组织中涉及其实施的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of Professionalism as an Issue in British Marketing The Quality of Working Life, Robotics and the Professional Engineer Escalation of Commitment in Groups and the Moderating Effects of Information Framing An exploratory RFID patent analysis Extending the intellectual bandwidth model: a case study from the bioscience industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1