The Combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for The Selection of The Best Lecturer

Deni Mahdiana, Nidya Kusumawardhany
{"title":"The Combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for The Selection of The Best Lecturer","authors":"Deni Mahdiana, Nidya Kusumawardhany","doi":"10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop a model of decision support systems (DSS) for the selection of the best lecturer at the Faculty of Information Technology of Universitas Budi Luhur using a combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) methods. In this study, 12 (twelve) criteria were used to select the best lecturers: Educational level, Academic functional position, Lecturer Certification, Lecturer Semester Performance Index, Number of Respondents, Average Number of Meetings, Number of Research, Number of community service, Number of Publications, Number of Grants, Discipline submit final exam scores and Faculty Discipline.The results of the calculation of the consistency ratio (CR) for the best lecturer selection criteria obtained CR values = 0.06. The calculation results are not more than 0.1 or 10 percent, so the comparison of the best lecturer selection criteria is consistent and does not require revision of the assessment. Quality Testing of DSS application software for the best lecturer selection was tested based on 4 (four) McCall method variables, namely Functionality, Reliability, Usability, and Efficiency. The overall test results show that the quality of the application of the decision support system for the selection of the best lecturers has a \"Good\" criterion of 78.20 percent.","PeriodicalId":375166,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study aims to develop a model of decision support systems (DSS) for the selection of the best lecturer at the Faculty of Information Technology of Universitas Budi Luhur using a combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) methods. In this study, 12 (twelve) criteria were used to select the best lecturers: Educational level, Academic functional position, Lecturer Certification, Lecturer Semester Performance Index, Number of Respondents, Average Number of Meetings, Number of Research, Number of community service, Number of Publications, Number of Grants, Discipline submit final exam scores and Faculty Discipline.The results of the calculation of the consistency ratio (CR) for the best lecturer selection criteria obtained CR values = 0.06. The calculation results are not more than 0.1 or 10 percent, so the comparison of the best lecturer selection criteria is consistent and does not require revision of the assessment. Quality Testing of DSS application software for the best lecturer selection was tested based on 4 (four) McCall method variables, namely Functionality, Reliability, Usability, and Efficiency. The overall test results show that the quality of the application of the decision support system for the selection of the best lecturers has a "Good" criterion of 78.20 percent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层次分析法与简单多属性评分法相结合的最佳讲师选择
本研究旨在运用层次分析法(AHP)和简单多属性评级技术(SMART)相结合的方法,开发一个决策支持系统(DSS)模型,用于Budi Luhur大学信息技术学院最佳讲师的选择。本研究采用教育水平、学术职能职位、讲师认证、讲师学期绩效指数、受访者数量、平均会议次数、研究次数、社区服务次数、发表论文数量、资助次数、提交期末考试学科成绩和教师学科等12项标准来选择最佳讲师。计算结果为最佳讲师选择标准的一致性比(CR),得到CR值= 0.06。计算结果不超过0.1%或10%,因此最佳讲师选择标准的比较是一致的,不需要修改评估。基于4个McCall方法变量,即功能性、可靠性、可用性和效率,对DSS应用软件的最佳讲师选择进行了质量测试。总体测试结果表明,决策支持系统在最佳讲师选拔中的应用质量为78.20%,为“良好”标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decentralized Tourism Destinations Rating System Using 6AsTD Framework and Blockchain ICoSTA 2020 Table of Contents IoT Based: Improving Control System For High-Quality Beef in Supermarkets Analysis of Power Transactions on the Integrated Solar Home System A Fuzzy Servqual Method for Evaluated Umrah Service Quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1