Explaining the Performance of Black Box Regression Models

Inês Areosa, L. Torgo
{"title":"Explaining the Performance of Black Box Regression Models","authors":"Inês Areosa, L. Torgo","doi":"10.1109/DSAA.2019.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread usage of Machine Learning and Data Mining models in several key areas of our societies has raised serious concerns in terms of accountability and ability to justify and interpret the decisions of these models. This is even more relevant when models are too complex and often regarded as black boxes. In this paper we present several tools designed to help in understanding and explaining the reasons for the observed predictive performance of black box regression models. We describe, evaluate and propose several variants of Error Dependence Plots. These plots provide a visual display of the expected relationship between the prediction error of any model and the values of a predictor variable. They allow the end user to understand what to expect from the models given some concrete values of the predictor variables. These tools allow more accurate explanations on the conditions that may lead to some failures of the models. Moreover, our proposed extensions also provide a multivariate perspective of this analysis, and the ability to compare the behaviour of multiple models under different conditions. This comparative analysis empowers the end user with the ability to have a case-based analysis of the risks associated with different models, and thus select the model with lower expected risk for each test case, or even decide not to use any model because the expected error is unacceptable.","PeriodicalId":416037,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2019.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The widespread usage of Machine Learning and Data Mining models in several key areas of our societies has raised serious concerns in terms of accountability and ability to justify and interpret the decisions of these models. This is even more relevant when models are too complex and often regarded as black boxes. In this paper we present several tools designed to help in understanding and explaining the reasons for the observed predictive performance of black box regression models. We describe, evaluate and propose several variants of Error Dependence Plots. These plots provide a visual display of the expected relationship between the prediction error of any model and the values of a predictor variable. They allow the end user to understand what to expect from the models given some concrete values of the predictor variables. These tools allow more accurate explanations on the conditions that may lead to some failures of the models. Moreover, our proposed extensions also provide a multivariate perspective of this analysis, and the ability to compare the behaviour of multiple models under different conditions. This comparative analysis empowers the end user with the ability to have a case-based analysis of the risks associated with different models, and thus select the model with lower expected risk for each test case, or even decide not to use any model because the expected error is unacceptable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释黑箱回归模型的性能
机器学习和数据挖掘模型在我们社会的几个关键领域的广泛使用,在问责制和证明和解释这些模型的决策的能力方面引起了严重的关注。当模型过于复杂且经常被视为黑盒时,这一点甚至更为重要。在本文中,我们提出了几个工具,旨在帮助理解和解释观察到的黑箱回归模型预测性能的原因。我们描述、评估并提出了误差依赖图的几种变体。这些图直观地显示了任何模型的预测误差与预测变量的值之间的预期关系。它们允许最终用户在给定预测变量的一些具体值的情况下理解从模型中期望得到什么。这些工具允许对可能导致模型失效的条件进行更准确的解释。此外,我们提出的扩展还提供了该分析的多变量视角,以及比较不同条件下多个模型行为的能力。这种比较分析使最终用户能够对与不同模型相关的风险进行基于案例的分析,从而为每个测试用例选择具有较低预期风险的模型,或者甚至决定不使用任何模型,因为预期的错误是不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rapid Prototyping Approach for High Performance Density-Based Clustering Automating Big Data Analysis Based on Deep Learning Generation by Automatic Service Composition Detecting Sensitive Content in Spoken Language Improving the Personalized Recommendation in the Cold-start Scenarios Colorwall: An Embedded Temporal Display of Bibliographic Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1