Suitability of FPS and DPS in NOMA for Real-Time and Non-Real Time Applications

Moontasir Rafique, Abdullah Alavi, Aadnan Farhad, M. T. Kawser
{"title":"Suitability of FPS and DPS in NOMA for Real-Time and Non-Real Time Applications","authors":"Moontasir Rafique, Abdullah Alavi, Aadnan Farhad, M. T. Kawser","doi":"10.23919/eecsi53397.2021.9624291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) is a popular solution for supporting a high number of users and along with significant bandwidth in 5G cellular communication. By using a technique called cooperative relaying, the same data is sent to all the users, and one user can relay data to the other. In order to provide enough power for the users, energy harvesting techniques have been introduced with Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT) coming to prominence in recent times. In this paper, analysis has been made comparing two different power allocation schemes in NOMA, Fixed Power allocation Scheme (FPS) and Dynamic Power allocation Scheme (DPS). The comparisons were made in terms of their performance and characteristics while undergoing SWIPT. It has been found that by using DPS, an almost 25% increase in peak spectral efficiency can be obtained compared to FPS. However, DPS suffers from a higher outage probability as the increase of power causes the signal bandwidth to drop below the target rate a significant number of times. Based on the detailed results, conclusions were drawn as to which power allocation coefficient scheme would be used in real-time and non-real time communication standards, respectively. The results suggest that for real-time communication, FPS is more suitable while for non-real time communication, DPS appears to work better than FPS.","PeriodicalId":259450,"journal":{"name":"2021 8th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 8th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/eecsi53397.2021.9624291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) is a popular solution for supporting a high number of users and along with significant bandwidth in 5G cellular communication. By using a technique called cooperative relaying, the same data is sent to all the users, and one user can relay data to the other. In order to provide enough power for the users, energy harvesting techniques have been introduced with Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT) coming to prominence in recent times. In this paper, analysis has been made comparing two different power allocation schemes in NOMA, Fixed Power allocation Scheme (FPS) and Dynamic Power allocation Scheme (DPS). The comparisons were made in terms of their performance and characteristics while undergoing SWIPT. It has been found that by using DPS, an almost 25% increase in peak spectral efficiency can be obtained compared to FPS. However, DPS suffers from a higher outage probability as the increase of power causes the signal bandwidth to drop below the target rate a significant number of times. Based on the detailed results, conclusions were drawn as to which power allocation coefficient scheme would be used in real-time and non-real time communication standards, respectively. The results suggest that for real-time communication, FPS is more suitable while for non-real time communication, DPS appears to work better than FPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NOMA中FPS和DPS在实时和非实时应用中的适用性
非正交多址(NOMA)是一种流行的解决方案,用于支持5G蜂窝通信中的大量用户和大量带宽。通过使用一种称为协作中继的技术,将相同的数据发送给所有用户,并且一个用户可以将数据转发给另一个用户。为了给用户提供足够的电力,能量收集技术被引入,同时无线信息和电力传输技术(SWIPT)近年来受到重视。本文对NOMA中两种不同的功率分配方案——固定功率分配方案(FPS)和动态功率分配方案(DPS)进行了分析比较。比较了它们在进行SWIPT时的性能和特点。研究发现,与FPS相比,使用DPS可以获得近25%的峰值光谱效率提高。然而,由于功率的增加导致信号带宽多次低于目标速率,DPS遭受更高的中断概率。在此基础上,得出了在实时通信标准和非实时通信标准中分别采用何种功率分配系数方案的结论。结果表明,对于实时通信,FPS更适合,而对于非实时通信,DPS似乎比FPS更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calibration of 93.1GHz FOD Detection Radar on Airport Runway using Trihedral Corner Reflector Techno-Economic Analysis of the NB-IoT Network Planning for Smart Metering Services in Urban Area Spiral-Coupled-Line Resonators for Chipless RFID Sensors A Convolutional Neural Network for Arrhythmia Classification: A Review Load Effect on Switched Reluctance Motor Using Hysteresis Current and Voltage Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1