Sampling Method for Comparing the Quality of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata), and Application of the Method to Samples Cultivated with Chemical or Organic Fertilizer

M. Kunihisa, Shin-ichi Tokuda, K. Murakami, A. Uragami, S. Aizawa, Y. Nakano, K. Okada, H. Higashio
{"title":"Sampling Method for Comparing the Quality of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata), and Application of the Method to Samples Cultivated with Chemical or Organic Fertilizer","authors":"M. Kunihisa, Shin-ichi Tokuda, K. Murakami, A. Uragami, S. Aizawa, Y. Nakano, K. Okada, H. Higashio","doi":"10.5891/jafps.38.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to compare , with minimum error , the quality of cabbages (β rassica olel 町 ea L. va r. capitata) cultivated with continuous application of chemical or organic fertilizer in fields from 2002 to 2010. To this end , we studied the influences of reduction of sample size , sample weigh t.註 nddegree of plant growth in each treatment on the q 凶 lityof cabbage. ① We found that constituent composition varied throughout the cabbage sphere. Therefore. it was necessary to obtain the representative aliquot for the analysis of nitrate and other constituents. ① In the 11 th planting , many qualitative characteristics (such as head density , L 同 ascorbicacid conten t. and nitrate content) were found to be corr ・ elatedwith the head weight of samples. Thus. the need for comparison of samples with equal weigh t. not simply representative weigh t. was confirmed. ③ For most analyzed characteristics , small differences were observed between cabbages subjected to the 2 manure tr ・ eatments with di 狂 erent degree of growth , only when the samples compared were of equal weigh t. By using these sampling methods , we compared the quality of cabbages cultivated with continuous application of chemical fertilizer or manure. On comparison of samples of representative weights , we found that the cabbages cultivated using manure had greater spheroidicity , dry matter and L-ascorbic acid contents , with lower head density and nitrate conten t. However , significant differences were found only in spheroidicity , head density , and nitrate content (only at the 11 th planting) between cabbages subjected to the 2 treatments , when comparing samples with equal weights.","PeriodicalId":262542,"journal":{"name":"Food Preservation Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Preservation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5891/jafps.38.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to compare , with minimum error , the quality of cabbages (β rassica olel 町 ea L. va r. capitata) cultivated with continuous application of chemical or organic fertilizer in fields from 2002 to 2010. To this end , we studied the influences of reduction of sample size , sample weigh t.註 nddegree of plant growth in each treatment on the q 凶 lityof cabbage. ① We found that constituent composition varied throughout the cabbage sphere. Therefore. it was necessary to obtain the representative aliquot for the analysis of nitrate and other constituents. ① In the 11 th planting , many qualitative characteristics (such as head density , L 同 ascorbicacid conten t. and nitrate content) were found to be corr ・ elatedwith the head weight of samples. Thus. the need for comparison of samples with equal weigh t. not simply representative weigh t. was confirmed. ③ For most analyzed characteristics , small differences were observed between cabbages subjected to the 2 manure tr ・ eatments with di 狂 erent degree of growth , only when the samples compared were of equal weigh t. By using these sampling methods , we compared the quality of cabbages cultivated with continuous application of chemical fertilizer or manure. On comparison of samples of representative weights , we found that the cabbages cultivated using manure had greater spheroidicity , dry matter and L-ascorbic acid contents , with lower head density and nitrate conten t. However , significant differences were found only in spheroidicity , head density , and nitrate content (only at the 11 th planting) between cabbages subjected to the 2 treatments , when comparing samples with equal weights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白菜品质比较的取样方法及其在化肥和有机肥栽培样品上的应用
本试验旨在以最小误差比较2002 ~ 2010年大田连续施用化肥和有机肥栽培的大白菜(β rassica olel ea L. va r. capitata)的品质。为此,我们研究了各处理的样本量减少、样本量、重量和植株生长程度对白菜生长因子的影响。我们发现,在整个白菜球中,成分成分各不相同。因此。为了分析硝酸盐和其他成分,有必要获得具有代表性的等价物。①在第11次种植中,发现许多定性特征(如穗密度、L -抗坏血酸含量、硝酸盐含量)与样品穗重相关。因此。确认了需要对具有相同重量t的样品进行比较,而不仅仅是代表性重量t。③所分析的大部分特性,只有在比较样品重量相等的情况下,2种有机肥处理的白菜在生长程度不同的情况下,差异很小。通过这些抽样方法,我们比较了连续施用化肥或有机肥栽培的白菜的质量。通过比较具有代表性重量的样品,我们发现有机肥栽培的白菜球度、干物质和l -抗坏血酸含量更高,穗密度和硝酸盐含量更低。但在相同重量的样品中,两种处理的白菜只有球度、穗密度和硝酸盐含量(仅在第11次种植时)存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the Measurement of Resistance to Gas Diffusion and the Resistance Characteristics in Citrus Iyo Fruit (Citrus iyo Hort. ex Tanaka) Mathematical Modeling of Intercellular Space Volume of Citrus Fruits Comparison of Shock during Fruit Export via Air and Marine Transportation Effect of Electrolyzed Acidic Water Treatment on the Physiological and Chemical Properties and Microorganisms of Ethylene-treated Banana Sections Effect of Heat-denaturation of Milk Protein on the Baking Quality of Milk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1