Assessing respiratory exposure to harmful evaporations in a manufacturing company

Tayyebeh Jaddi Madarsara, Navid Ahmadian Kudakan, S. Yari, H. Saeidabadi
{"title":"Assessing respiratory exposure to harmful evaporations in a manufacturing company","authors":"Tayyebeh Jaddi Madarsara, Navid Ahmadian Kudakan, S. Yari, H. Saeidabadi","doi":"10.31557/APJEC.2019.2.1.55-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Using Hypochlorite Sodium in producing bleaches in order to disinfect and shine surfaces has been an ordinary method since 200 years ago. 10-15% solutions with PH=13 have been used for industrial purposes and 5% solutions with PH=11 have been used for domestic use. AIHA (American Industrial Hygienists Association) has announced the maximum standard exposure to this substance equal to 2mg/m3 in a period of 15 minutes. It should be noted that, based on material safety data sheet and NFPA rating explanation guide, the mentioned substance is mildly unstable (code 1), carries oxidation hazard (ox), and serious respiratory hazard (code 3). \n  \nMethods: This survey has been conducted with statistical society of 39, average age of 29.82±3.66 and work experience of 2.46±6.02 who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium in 2019. The reference of analyzing the data include medical check-up inventory, spirometry FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC relativity, using SPSS ver16, and T-test. \n  \nResults: The statistical society (39 participants) had a normal distribution, with a very pleasant correlation amounts in (FEV1/FVC, FVC, FEV1) considering sig=0.13, andless possibility than (P≤0.05). therefore, the amounts before and after FEV1, and FEV1/FVC, had a meaningful difference statistically, however, taking the amount of sig=0.68 into account which was P≤0.05, no meaningful difference was observed for FVC amounts before and after respiratory exposure to Hypochlorite Sodium. \n  \nConclusion: Considering the reduction in amount of FEV1, and FEV1/FVC among the workers of the manufacturing site who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium, they are likely to have pulmonary obstruction, and therefore they are required to be changed in position and location of their jobs, and also appropriate ventilation system must be installed in the location of Hypochlorite Sodium evaporations. Keeping in mind the instability and corrosiveness of Hypochlorite Sodium, all employees had better use respiratory masks (preferably FFP3 in case of dusty materials), proper face shields, anti-acid gloves, anti-acid overalls, and chemical resistant boots. \n  \nKeywords: Respiratory exposure assessment, Occupational Asthma, Hypochlorite Sodium, Bleach, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, CANCER.","PeriodicalId":270461,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Cancer","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJEC.2019.2.1.55-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Using Hypochlorite Sodium in producing bleaches in order to disinfect and shine surfaces has been an ordinary method since 200 years ago. 10-15% solutions with PH=13 have been used for industrial purposes and 5% solutions with PH=11 have been used for domestic use. AIHA (American Industrial Hygienists Association) has announced the maximum standard exposure to this substance equal to 2mg/m3 in a period of 15 minutes. It should be noted that, based on material safety data sheet and NFPA rating explanation guide, the mentioned substance is mildly unstable (code 1), carries oxidation hazard (ox), and serious respiratory hazard (code 3).   Methods: This survey has been conducted with statistical society of 39, average age of 29.82±3.66 and work experience of 2.46±6.02 who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium in 2019. The reference of analyzing the data include medical check-up inventory, spirometry FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC relativity, using SPSS ver16, and T-test.   Results: The statistical society (39 participants) had a normal distribution, with a very pleasant correlation amounts in (FEV1/FVC, FVC, FEV1) considering sig=0.13, andless possibility than (P≤0.05). therefore, the amounts before and after FEV1, and FEV1/FVC, had a meaningful difference statistically, however, taking the amount of sig=0.68 into account which was P≤0.05, no meaningful difference was observed for FVC amounts before and after respiratory exposure to Hypochlorite Sodium.   Conclusion: Considering the reduction in amount of FEV1, and FEV1/FVC among the workers of the manufacturing site who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium, they are likely to have pulmonary obstruction, and therefore they are required to be changed in position and location of their jobs, and also appropriate ventilation system must be installed in the location of Hypochlorite Sodium evaporations. Keeping in mind the instability and corrosiveness of Hypochlorite Sodium, all employees had better use respiratory masks (preferably FFP3 in case of dusty materials), proper face shields, anti-acid gloves, anti-acid overalls, and chemical resistant boots.   Keywords: Respiratory exposure assessment, Occupational Asthma, Hypochlorite Sodium, Bleach, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, CANCER.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一家制造公司对有害蒸发物的呼吸暴露
简介:使用次氯酸钠来生产漂白剂,以消毒和光亮表面,自200年前以来一直是一种普通的方法。10-15% PH=13的溶液用于工业用途,5% PH=11的溶液用于家庭用途。AIHA(美国工业卫生学家协会)宣布在15分钟内接触这种物质的最大标准为2mg/m3。需要说明的是,根据材料安全数据表和NFPA等级说明指南,上述物质为轻度不稳定(代码1),具有氧化危害(ox),严重呼吸危害(代码3)。方法:对2019年接触次氯酸钠的统计社会年龄39岁,平均年龄29.82±3.66岁,工作经历2.46±6.02人进行调查。数据分析参考包括体格检查量表、肺活量FEV1、FVC及FEV1/FVC相关性,采用SPSS ver16, t检验。结果:统计社会(39名参与者)符合正态分布,(FEV1/FVC, FVC, FEV1)的相关量非常令人满意,考虑sig=0.13,可能性小于(P≤0.05)。因此,呼吸暴露前后FEV1、FEV1/FVC的差异有统计学意义,但考虑到sig=0.68, P≤0.05,呼吸暴露前后FVC的差异无统计学意义。结论:考虑到生产现场工人暴露于次氯酸钠后的FEV1量和FEV1/FVC的减少,有发生肺阻塞的可能,因此需要改变工作位置和位置,并在次氯酸钠蒸发的位置安装合适的通风系统。考虑到次氯酸钠的不稳定性和腐蚀性,所有员工最好使用呼吸面罩(最好是FFP3,以防有灰尘的材料),适当的面罩,防酸手套,防酸工作服和耐化学品的靴子。关键词:呼吸暴露评估,职业性哮喘,次氯酸钠,漂白剂,FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC,癌症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Exposure to Noise and Vibration and Its Effect on Work-related Fatigue Unveiling Cancer Burden: An Epidemiological Study in a Tertiary Cancer Center, Thailand The Study of Exposure to Isophorone and the Risk of Getting Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol An Overview of the Application of Nanoscience in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Using GIS to Understand Cervical Cancer Screening Behaviors among Women Living with HIV (WLWH) in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1