Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection

C. Baltag, Y. Dautaj
{"title":"Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection","authors":"C. Baltag, Y. Dautaj","doi":"10.1163/24055778-12340008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe global environmental disruption caused by human activity is firmly entrenched as a scientific fact. The present paper looks at the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system and inquires whether this is the most suitable transnational venue for resolving investment disputes that have an environmental component. This culminates essentially in whether arbitration is a legitimate forum and whether privately appointed arbitrators appropriately can resolve environmental-related disputes. These disputes are bound to increase in frequency because host-States are also partaking in global efforts to respond to environmental challenges.\nThis paper makes several points. First, ISDS is the best equipped venue for addressing investment disputes that have an environmental or natural resources component. Second, the “regulatory chill” and the alleged “investor bias” arguments are unsubstantiated whereas, a balance must be struck between backlash, legitimacy, and workability. Third, ISDS will eventually and inevitably facilitate green-investors, while holding States accountable for green-undertakings, and therefore continue to effectively enforce the rule of law globally. Fourth, arbitrators must adapt to their role of handling disputes at the intersection of international investment law and environmental law; this means that a thorough thick rule of law must effectively be implemented. Fifth, International Investment Agreements (IIA s) should be reconsidered or interpreted in order to accommodate for investors’ obligations, as well as widening the scope of States’ regulatory powers. Finally, ISDS will only remain the best alternative if it sticks to its fundamental elements, in particular by utilizing the regime’s flexibility to allow counterclaims from host States. Only such reform-proposals that preserve and enhance the fundamental elements of international arbitration should be seriously considered.","PeriodicalId":133697,"journal":{"name":"Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24055778-12340008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The global environmental disruption caused by human activity is firmly entrenched as a scientific fact. The present paper looks at the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system and inquires whether this is the most suitable transnational venue for resolving investment disputes that have an environmental component. This culminates essentially in whether arbitration is a legitimate forum and whether privately appointed arbitrators appropriately can resolve environmental-related disputes. These disputes are bound to increase in frequency because host-States are also partaking in global efforts to respond to environmental challenges. This paper makes several points. First, ISDS is the best equipped venue for addressing investment disputes that have an environmental or natural resources component. Second, the “regulatory chill” and the alleged “investor bias” arguments are unsubstantiated whereas, a balance must be struck between backlash, legitimacy, and workability. Third, ISDS will eventually and inevitably facilitate green-investors, while holding States accountable for green-undertakings, and therefore continue to effectively enforce the rule of law globally. Fourth, arbitrators must adapt to their role of handling disputes at the intersection of international investment law and environmental law; this means that a thorough thick rule of law must effectively be implemented. Fifth, International Investment Agreements (IIA s) should be reconsidered or interpreted in order to accommodate for investors’ obligations, as well as widening the scope of States’ regulatory powers. Finally, ISDS will only remain the best alternative if it sticks to its fundamental elements, in particular by utilizing the regime’s flexibility to allow counterclaims from host States. Only such reform-proposals that preserve and enhance the fundamental elements of international arbitration should be seriously considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资者、国家和仲裁员在国际投资法和环境保护的十字准星
人类活动造成的全球环境破坏是一个根深蒂固的科学事实。本文着眼于投资者-国家争端解决(ISDS)制度,并探讨这是否是解决具有环境成分的投资争端的最合适的跨国场所。这主要取决于仲裁是否是一个合法的论坛,以及私人指定的仲裁员是否能够适当地解决与环境有关的纠纷。由于东道国也在参与应对环境挑战的全球努力,这些争端必然会更加频繁。本文提出了几点观点。首先,ISDS是解决涉及环境或自然资源的投资争端的最佳场所。其次,“监管寒意”和所谓的“投资者偏见”论点是没有根据的,然而,必须在反弹、合法性和可行性之间取得平衡。第三,ISDS最终将不可避免地为绿色投资者提供便利,同时要求各国对绿色企业负责,从而继续在全球有效地执行法治。第四,仲裁员必须适应其在国际投资法和环境法交叉领域处理纠纷的角色;这意味着必须有效实施全面的法治。第五,应重新审议或解释《国际投资协定》,以便顾及投资者的义务,并扩大各国管理权力的范围。最后,只有坚持其基本要素,特别是利用该制度的灵活性允许东道国提出反诉,ISDS才会继续是最好的选择。只有这种保留和加强国际仲裁基本要素的改革建议才应该得到认真考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1