The impact of chronic administration of evening primrose oil and flaxseed oil on redox status of male and female Wistar albino rats

N. Draginic, M. Andjic, V. Zivkovic, Kristina Radoman, M. Nikolić, Maja Savić, A. M. Samanovic, S. Bolevich, V. Jakovljevic
{"title":"The impact of chronic administration of evening primrose oil and flaxseed oil on redox status of male and female Wistar albino rats","authors":"N. Draginic, M. Andjic, V. Zivkovic, Kristina Radoman, M. Nikolić, Maja Savić, A. M. Samanovic, S. Bolevich, V. Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taken into consideration that oxidative stress response to flaxseed (FSO) and evening primrose oil (EPO) has still not been clarified, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of these two oils, rich in omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on systemic redox status in male and female Wistar albino rats. The study was carried out on 60 Wistar albino rats classified into two groups, male and female rats. Both groups were divided into three subgroups according to applied oil. The first subgroup was control group, without treatment. The second and third subgroups included animals treated with FSO or EPO in a dose of 300mg/kg/day and 10mg/kg/day per os, respectively. After 6 weeks of treatment, the animals were sacrificed. Following pro-oxidative markers were measured spectrophotometrically from plasma samples: nitrites (NO2-), superoxide anion radical (02-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), index of lipid peroxidation (TBARS). Parameters of antioxidant protection were measured from erythrocyte lysate: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and reduced glutathione (GSH). No significant gender specific differences in pro-oxidant markers were noticed in between EPO and FSO groups (p>0.05). Both EPO and FSO significantly increased SOD and GSH compared to CTRL in both genders (p<0.05), while FSO improved CAT values only in males, and EPO only in females. Chronic administration of EPO and FSO omega 3and 6 rich plant oils improved antioxidant defense system with slight gender specific differences in CAT. It's effect on pro-oxidants didn't seem to be protective.","PeriodicalId":343724,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE52308.2021.9635420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taken into consideration that oxidative stress response to flaxseed (FSO) and evening primrose oil (EPO) has still not been clarified, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of these two oils, rich in omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on systemic redox status in male and female Wistar albino rats. The study was carried out on 60 Wistar albino rats classified into two groups, male and female rats. Both groups were divided into three subgroups according to applied oil. The first subgroup was control group, without treatment. The second and third subgroups included animals treated with FSO or EPO in a dose of 300mg/kg/day and 10mg/kg/day per os, respectively. After 6 weeks of treatment, the animals were sacrificed. Following pro-oxidative markers were measured spectrophotometrically from plasma samples: nitrites (NO2-), superoxide anion radical (02-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), index of lipid peroxidation (TBARS). Parameters of antioxidant protection were measured from erythrocyte lysate: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and reduced glutathione (GSH). No significant gender specific differences in pro-oxidant markers were noticed in between EPO and FSO groups (p>0.05). Both EPO and FSO significantly increased SOD and GSH compared to CTRL in both genders (p<0.05), while FSO improved CAT values only in males, and EPO only in females. Chronic administration of EPO and FSO omega 3and 6 rich plant oils improved antioxidant defense system with slight gender specific differences in CAT. It's effect on pro-oxidants didn't seem to be protective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
月见草油和亚麻籽油对雄性和雌性Wistar白化大鼠氧化还原状态的影响
考虑到对亚麻籽(FSO)和月见草油(EPO)的氧化应激反应尚不清楚,本研究的目的是评估这两种富含omega-3和omega-6多不饱和脂肪酸的油对雄性和雌性Wistar白化大鼠全身氧化还原状态的影响。研究对象为60只Wistar白化大鼠,分为雄性和雌性两组。两组根据涂抹的油脂分为三个亚组。第一亚组为对照组,未经治疗。第二和第三亚组分别用300mg/kg/天和10mg/kg/天的FSO或EPO治疗动物。治疗6周后,处死动物。采用分光光度法测定血浆样品的促氧化标志物:亚硝酸盐(NO2-)、超氧阴离子自由基(02-)、过氧化氢(H2O2)、脂质过氧化指数(TBARS)。测定红细胞裂解液的抗氧化保护参数:超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和还原性谷胱甘肽(GSH)。促氧化标志物在EPO组和FSO组间无显著性别差异(p>0.05)。与对照组相比,EPO和FSO均能显著提高SOD和GSH (p<0.05),而FSO仅能提高雄性小鼠的CAT值,EPO仅能提高雌性小鼠的CAT值。长期服用富含欧米伽3和6的EPO和FSO植物油可改善抗氧化防御系统,但CAT有轻微的性别差异。它对促氧化剂的作用似乎没有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural, antimicrobial, and molecular docking study of 3-(1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)amino) ethylidene)chroman-2,4-dione and its corresponding Pd complex Multiple-Activation Parallel Convolution Network in Combination with t-SNE for the Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment Analyzing the Impact of Resampling Approaches on Chest X-Ray Images for COVID-19 Identification in a Local Hierarchical Classification Scenario Analysis of knee joint forces in different types of jumps of top futsal players at the beginning and at the end of the preparation period Design and evaluation of a noninvasive tongue-computer interface for individuals with severe disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1