{"title":"Activating Archives in Women's Studies 101: New Stories about Old Feminism and the Future","authors":"Jen McDaneld","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2017 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois One of feminist theory’s oldest and most productive critiques has been its analysis of women’s erasure from the historical record and its insistence that what has stood in for the past has in fact been a male-centric version of history. It shouldn’t be surprising, then, that the history of the feminist movement is likewise often similarly erased, but it’s something that I encountered anew in my Introduction to Women’s Studies course this past year. I had begun the term concerned about reifying the “wave” construction of feminist history, not wanting to create tidy narratives of the past that obscure more than they reveal. Indeed, I had developed my syllabus and many of my lesson plans with this problem in mind, spending ample time complicating common narratives of feminist history and asking students to discuss their own commonplaces and stereotypes of the movement’s past. I was still surprised, however, by the response I got when I asked students to write down what came to mind when they heard the term “second-wave feminism.” When it came time to debrief their writing, students were at first reluctant to share, but as we got going it became clear that this reluctance was borne out of a frustration: they didn’t have any solid conceptions of what the second wave was. A few ventured comments about bra-burning and one mentioned civil rights, but the class discussion quickly turned to students venting their frustration that they had never really been taught anything of note about the history of feminism. One joked that the movement hadn’t even received one of those sidebar graphics so often used to represent groups considered “outsiders” in American history textbooks. But just because students were aware of, and frustrated by, the fact that they hadn’t been taught much at all about the history of the movement isn’t to say that they still didn’t come to the class with their own stories about how the feminism of today relates to the past. A case in point: we had spent the better part of the first month of the course discussing intersectional feminism and the ways that identities construct, and are constructed by, the social world in which we live. As we grappled with this material, it became clear that students were operating with a kind of unstated but powerful sense that today’s brand of progressive feminism, Activating Archives in Women’s Studies 101: New Stories about Old Feminism and the Future","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
激活妇女研究的档案101:关于旧女权主义和未来的新故事
女性主义理论最古老、最富有成效的批评之一是它对女性从历史记录中被抹去的分析,以及它坚持认为,代表过去的东西实际上是男性中心的历史版本。因此,女权运动的历史同样经常被抹去也就不足为奇了,但这是我在去年的《妇女研究导论》课程中再次遇到的问题。我开始使用这个术语的时候,关心的是将女权主义历史的“浪潮”建构具体化,不想创造出对过去的整齐的叙述,这些叙述掩盖的比揭示的要多。事实上,我在制定教学大纲和许多教案时就考虑到了这个问题,我花了大量时间将女权主义历史的常见叙述复杂化,并要求学生们讨论他们自己对女权运动过去的常见看法和刻板印象。然而,当我让学生们写下他们听到“第二波女权主义”这个词时的想法时,他们的反应仍然让我感到惊讶。到了汇报他们的写作的时候,学生们一开始不愿意分享,但随着我们的深入,这种不愿意显然是出于一种沮丧:他们对第二波浪潮是什么没有任何坚实的概念。有几个人大胆地评论了烧胸罩的事,还有一个人提到了民权,但课堂讨论很快就变成了学生们发泄他们的失望,因为他们从来没有真正学到过任何关于女权主义历史的重要知识。有人开玩笑说,该运动甚至没有收到美国历史教科书中经常用来代表“局外人”群体的边栏图表。但是,仅仅因为学生们意识到这一点,并为他们没有学到多少关于女权运动的历史这一事实感到沮丧,并不意味着他们仍然没有带着自己的故事来上课,讲述今天的女权主义与过去的关系。举个恰当的例子:我们花了课程第一个月的大部分时间来讨论交叉性女权主义,以及我们所生活的社会世界如何构建身份,以及身份如何被我们所生活的社会世界构建。当我们与这些材料作斗争时,很明显,学生们带着一种没有明说但很强烈的感觉在工作,那就是今天的进步女权主义,激活妇女研究101中的档案:关于旧女权主义和未来的新故事
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。