Popper as a process: revisiting the appropriation of the Popperian philosophy by the cladists during the “systematics wars”

M. D. Santis
{"title":"Popper as a process: revisiting the appropriation of the Popperian philosophy by the cladists during the “systematics wars”","authors":"M. D. Santis","doi":"10.11606/2176-7793/2020.51.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The philosophy of Karl Popper was strongly used by the cladists in their battle against evolutionary and numerical taxonomy. It became known as “Systematics Wars” by David Hull. His historical account in Science as a Process, described the outcome of that era that end up with the victory of cladistics. Claiming it as hypothetico-deductivist, and falsificationist, cladists have transformed and distorted Popper, that almost nothing of these ideas survived scrutiny. One of the Hull’s conclusion was that the success of cladistics was largely due to their ability to maintain social cohesion and intellectual orthodoxy during the years of the Systematic Wars. In this paper, I will provide a concise historical development about the appropriation of Popper’s ideas that were used by systematics, both as a defense and as a critic, trying to make clear the interpretations of these authors in relation to Popper and their research program. Using David Hull’s General Theory of Selection Processes, I will argue that these facts were, partially, to a heavy adherence to Popper’s philosophy.","PeriodicalId":274949,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Zoologia","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Zoologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/2176-7793/2020.51.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The philosophy of Karl Popper was strongly used by the cladists in their battle against evolutionary and numerical taxonomy. It became known as “Systematics Wars” by David Hull. His historical account in Science as a Process, described the outcome of that era that end up with the victory of cladistics. Claiming it as hypothetico-deductivist, and falsificationist, cladists have transformed and distorted Popper, that almost nothing of these ideas survived scrutiny. One of the Hull’s conclusion was that the success of cladistics was largely due to their ability to maintain social cohesion and intellectual orthodoxy during the years of the Systematic Wars. In this paper, I will provide a concise historical development about the appropriation of Popper’s ideas that were used by systematics, both as a defense and as a critic, trying to make clear the interpretations of these authors in relation to Popper and their research program. Using David Hull’s General Theory of Selection Processes, I will argue that these facts were, partially, to a heavy adherence to Popper’s philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波普尔是一个过程:重新审视“系统论战争”中分支主义者对波普尔哲学的挪用
卡尔·波普尔的哲学被进化论者在反对进化分类学和数字分类学的斗争中强有力地使用。它被大卫·赫尔称为“系统论之战”。他在《作为过程的科学》一书中描述了那个时代的结果,最终以分类学的胜利而告终。声称它是假设演绎主义者和证伪主义者,克拉蒂主义者已经改变和扭曲了波普尔,这些思想几乎没有一个经得起审查。赫尔的结论之一是,分支学的成功很大程度上是由于它们在系统战争时期保持社会凝聚力和知识正统的能力。在这篇论文中,我将提供一个简明的历史发展,关于波普尔的思想被用于系统学,既作为辩护,也作为批评,试图弄清楚这些作者对波普尔和他们的研究计划的解释。根据David Hull的《选择过程通论》,我认为这些事实在一定程度上是对波普尔哲学的强烈遵从。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A descoberta dos marsupiais e a “simivulpa”, um esquecido símbolo do Novo Mundo The earliest iconographic record of Gobioides broussonnetii La Cepède, 1800 (Gobiiformes: Gobiidae): the species identity of the “Caramuru” paintings of Dutch Brazil (1624-1654) Ecological attributes of aquatic invertebrates in two water turbidity scenarios in a lake of the Pantanal, Brazil Updated list of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) from the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul A genebic revision of the teibe methiini in the western hemispheee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1