{"title":"Toxicity in Architectural Plastics","authors":"F. Trubiano","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-2426-8.ch004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The building industry lacks a holistic and integrated method for assessing the possible human health risks attendant to using materials that have been verified as toxic. In particular, it lacks an open-source, interactive interface for measuring the health risks associated with sourcing, manufacturing, selecting, installing, using, maintaining, and disposing of building-based polymers. Because of their high degree of chemical synthesis, polymers are typically more toxic than wood, glass, or concrete; yet architects, engineers, builders, clients, and the general public remain poorly informed about the deadly accumulation of synthetic polymers that originate in the building industry and that pervade our air, water, and bodies. This question should be central to the very definition and practice of life-cycle assessment, and this chapter outlines a process for developing an industry-based life-cycle index of human health in building (LCI-HHB). After all, traditional LCAs are of little help to anyone not healthy enough to enjoy them.","PeriodicalId":331519,"journal":{"name":"Research Anthology on Environmental and Societal Well-Being Considerations in Buildings and Architecture","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Anthology on Environmental and Societal Well-Being Considerations in Buildings and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2426-8.ch004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The building industry lacks a holistic and integrated method for assessing the possible human health risks attendant to using materials that have been verified as toxic. In particular, it lacks an open-source, interactive interface for measuring the health risks associated with sourcing, manufacturing, selecting, installing, using, maintaining, and disposing of building-based polymers. Because of their high degree of chemical synthesis, polymers are typically more toxic than wood, glass, or concrete; yet architects, engineers, builders, clients, and the general public remain poorly informed about the deadly accumulation of synthetic polymers that originate in the building industry and that pervade our air, water, and bodies. This question should be central to the very definition and practice of life-cycle assessment, and this chapter outlines a process for developing an industry-based life-cycle index of human health in building (LCI-HHB). After all, traditional LCAs are of little help to anyone not healthy enough to enjoy them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑塑料的毒性
建筑业缺乏一种全面和综合的方法来评估使用已被证实有毒的材料可能对人类健康造成的风险。特别是,它缺乏一个开源的交互式界面来衡量与采购、制造、选择、安装、使用、维护和处置基于建筑物的聚合物相关的健康风险。由于其高度的化学合成,聚合物通常比木材、玻璃或混凝土更有毒;然而,建筑师、工程师、建筑商、客户和普通公众仍然对合成聚合物的致命积累知之甚少,这些合成聚合物起源于建筑行业,并弥漫在我们的空气、水和身体中。这个问题应该是生命周期评估的定义和实践的核心,本章概述了制定基于行业的建筑人类健康生命周期指数(lci - hbb)的过程。毕竟,传统的lca对那些身体不够健康无法享用它们的人帮助不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Environmental Impact Score of a Residential Building Using Life Cycle Assessment Financing the Green Building Retrofitting Investments Construction of Cooperative Environment and Institution for Green Building Supply Chain Subjects Environmental Analysis of Construction Materials Considerations Regarding the Green Retrofitting of Residential Buildings From Human Wellbeing Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1