Relationships between Positive Character Traits, Virtues, and Health

D. Yoon, Patricia Bruininks, Erin I. Smith, C. Witvliet, Daniel Cohen, L. Edman, Joseph Bankard, Kathleen R. Little, B. Johnstone
{"title":"Relationships between Positive Character Traits, Virtues, and Health","authors":"D. Yoon, Patricia Bruininks, Erin I. Smith, C. Witvliet, Daniel Cohen, L. Edman, Joseph Bankard, Kathleen R. Little, B. Johnstone","doi":"10.34043/swc.v49i2.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtues and character traits are increasingly recognized as impacting health outcomes, although distinctions between these constructs remain unclear. In order for Christian social workers to most effectively incorporate virtues-based interventions into their clinical practices, there is a need to identify the distinct nature of the different virtues and their relationships to health outcomes. In Part I, a principal components factor analysis of six character traits (i.e., altruism, empathy, forgiveness, gratitude, hope, and humility) based on 402 students primarily from Christian universities determined the empirical validity of these constructs (i.e., whether they are best conceptualized as distinct constructs, dimensions of higher order constructs, or one overall “goodness” virtue). Results identified 12 distinct character traits, suggesting a need to focus on specific character traits rather than general virtues. In Part II, hierarchical regressions indicated that personality variables predicted 37% of variance in mental health, with only gratitude and lack of resentment toward others (i.e., two of the 12 identified character traits) predicting an additional 8% of the variance (no variables predicted physical health). The results suggest the need to conceptualize character traits as distinct constructs, and that interventions to increase gratitude and reduce resentment may be most effective in improving mental health outcomes in Christian college students.  \n ","PeriodicalId":159660,"journal":{"name":"Social Work & Christianity","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work & Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34043/swc.v49i2.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Virtues and character traits are increasingly recognized as impacting health outcomes, although distinctions between these constructs remain unclear. In order for Christian social workers to most effectively incorporate virtues-based interventions into their clinical practices, there is a need to identify the distinct nature of the different virtues and their relationships to health outcomes. In Part I, a principal components factor analysis of six character traits (i.e., altruism, empathy, forgiveness, gratitude, hope, and humility) based on 402 students primarily from Christian universities determined the empirical validity of these constructs (i.e., whether they are best conceptualized as distinct constructs, dimensions of higher order constructs, or one overall “goodness” virtue). Results identified 12 distinct character traits, suggesting a need to focus on specific character traits rather than general virtues. In Part II, hierarchical regressions indicated that personality variables predicted 37% of variance in mental health, with only gratitude and lack of resentment toward others (i.e., two of the 12 identified character traits) predicting an additional 8% of the variance (no variables predicted physical health). The results suggest the need to conceptualize character traits as distinct constructs, and that interventions to increase gratitude and reduce resentment may be most effective in improving mental health outcomes in Christian college students.   
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极性格特征、美德和健康之间的关系
美德和性格特征越来越被认为影响健康结果,尽管这些构念之间的区别尚不清楚。为了使基督教社会工作者最有效地将基于美德的干预措施纳入其临床实践,有必要确定不同美德的独特性质及其与健康结果的关系。在第一部分中,对主要来自基督教大学的402名学生进行了六种性格特征(即利他主义、同理心、宽恕、感恩、希望和谦卑)的主成分因子分析,确定了这些构念的经验有效性(即,它们是否最好被概念化为不同的构念、高阶构念的维度,还是一个整体的“善良”美德)。结果确定了12种不同的性格特征,这表明需要关注特定的性格特征,而不是一般的美德。在第二部分中,层次回归表明,人格变量预测了37%的心理健康方差,只有感恩和对他人不怨恨(即12个已确定的性格特征中的两个)预测了另外8%的方差(没有变量预测身体健康)。结果表明,有必要将性格特征概念化为不同的构念,并且增加感激和减少怨恨的干预措施可能是改善基督教大学生心理健康结果的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Inequality of Disasters: The Role of Faith-based Organizations in Disaster Response and Recovery Teaching across Cultures: Contextualizing Education for Global Mission The Culture of Compassion in Social Service and Academic Settings:My Personal Experience Every Good Endeavor: Connecting Your Work to God's Work Social Work Student Perceptions of Racism, Implicit Bias, and Other Forms of Discrimination: A Racial Justice Climate Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1