Transparency and Collateral: The Design of CCPs' Loss Allocation Rules

Gaetano Antinolfi, Francesca Carapella, Francesco Carli
{"title":"Transparency and Collateral: The Design of CCPs' Loss Allocation Rules","authors":"Gaetano Antinolfi, Francesca Carapella, Francesco Carli","doi":"10.17016/feds.2019.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper adopts a mechanism design approach to study optimal clearing arrangements for bilateral financial contracts in which an assessment of counterparty risk is crucial for efficiency. The economy is populated by two types of agents: a borrower and lender. The borrower is subject to limited commitment and holds private information about the severity of such lack of commitment. The lender can acquire information at a cost about the commitment of the borrower, which affects the assessment of counterparty risk. When truthful revelation by the borrower is not incentive compatible, the mechanism designer optimally trades off the value of information about the lack of commitment of the borrower with the cost of incentivizing the lender to acquire such information. Central clearing of these financial contracts through a central counterparty (CCP) allows lenders to mutualize their counterparty risks, but this insurance may weaken incentives to acquire and reveal informatio n about such risks. If information acquisition is incentive compatible, then lenders choose central clearing. If it is not, they may prefer bilateral clearing to prevent strategic default by borrowers and to economize on costly collateral. Central clearing is analyzed under different institutional features observed in financial markets, which place different restrictions on the contract space in the mechanism design problem. The interaction between the costly information acquisition and the limited commitment friction differs significantly in each clearing arrangement and in each set of restrictions. This results in novel lessons about the desirability of central versus bilateral clearing depending on traders' characteristics and the institutional features defining the operation of the CCP.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2019.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper adopts a mechanism design approach to study optimal clearing arrangements for bilateral financial contracts in which an assessment of counterparty risk is crucial for efficiency. The economy is populated by two types of agents: a borrower and lender. The borrower is subject to limited commitment and holds private information about the severity of such lack of commitment. The lender can acquire information at a cost about the commitment of the borrower, which affects the assessment of counterparty risk. When truthful revelation by the borrower is not incentive compatible, the mechanism designer optimally trades off the value of information about the lack of commitment of the borrower with the cost of incentivizing the lender to acquire such information. Central clearing of these financial contracts through a central counterparty (CCP) allows lenders to mutualize their counterparty risks, but this insurance may weaken incentives to acquire and reveal informatio n about such risks. If information acquisition is incentive compatible, then lenders choose central clearing. If it is not, they may prefer bilateral clearing to prevent strategic default by borrowers and to economize on costly collateral. Central clearing is analyzed under different institutional features observed in financial markets, which place different restrictions on the contract space in the mechanism design problem. The interaction between the costly information acquisition and the limited commitment friction differs significantly in each clearing arrangement and in each set of restrictions. This results in novel lessons about the desirability of central versus bilateral clearing depending on traders' characteristics and the institutional features defining the operation of the CCP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明度与担保:ccp损失分担规则的设计
本文采用机制设计方法研究双边金融合同的最优清算安排,其中交易对手风险评估对效率至关重要。经济中充斥着两种类型的代理人:借款人和贷款人。借款人须承担有限的承诺,并对这种缺乏承诺的严重程度持有私人信息。贷款人可以以一定的成本获取借款人的承诺信息,从而影响对交易对手风险的评估。当借款人的真实披露与激励不相容时,机制设计者最优地权衡了关于借款人缺乏承诺的信息的价值与激励贷款人获取这些信息的成本。通过中央对手方(CCP)对这些金融合约进行中央清算,允许贷款人共同承担其对手方风险,但这种保险可能会削弱获取和披露此类风险信息的动机。如果信息获取是激励相容的,那么出借人选择中央清算。如果不是,他们可能更倾向于双边清算,以防止借款人的战略违约,并节省昂贵的抵押品。在机制设计问题中,分析了金融市场不同的制度特征对合约空间的不同限制。在每一种清算安排和每一组限制条件下,昂贵的信息获取与有限的承诺摩擦之间的相互作用存在显著差异。这就产生了关于中央清算与双边清算的可取性的新教训,这取决于交易者的特征和定义CCP运作的制度特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed Hype Cycles: Dynamic Information Design with Two Audiences A Mechanism and Matching in a Social Dilemma The quasi-sorting equilibrium and incentive effects in parallel contests with multiple types of players Competition and Selection in Credit Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1