Politics

K. E. Løgstrup, Kees van Kooten Niekerk, Kristian-Alberto Lykke Cobos, H. Fink, Bjørn Rabjerg, R. Stern
{"title":"Politics","authors":"K. E. Løgstrup, Kees van Kooten Niekerk, Kristian-Alberto Lykke Cobos, H. Fink, Bjørn Rabjerg, R. Stern","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Løgstrup firstly argues that the differences between the estate-based society of Luther’s time and our modern society mean that we cannot simply apply Luther to today’s problems. Løgstrup turns to specific political issues: state funding of culture, the influence of non-governmental organizations and pressure groups, and the rules of diplomacy in foreign policy. One particular problem related to Luther concerns the right of resistance, since Luther and the Reformers clearly forbade rebellion. But today, due to the structure of power in democracies, we not only have a right of resistance, but a duty to resist oppressors. Løgstrup discusses the problem of how to maintain high standards (e.g. in education and culture) in a democratic society, because democracy involves the risk that the knowledge of experts will be set aside by the will of the uninformed many. Løgstrup also discusses democracy’s risk of becoming a utopian trust in progress and development.","PeriodicalId":179208,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Concepts and Problems","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Concepts and Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Løgstrup firstly argues that the differences between the estate-based society of Luther’s time and our modern society mean that we cannot simply apply Luther to today’s problems. Løgstrup turns to specific political issues: state funding of culture, the influence of non-governmental organizations and pressure groups, and the rules of diplomacy in foreign policy. One particular problem related to Luther concerns the right of resistance, since Luther and the Reformers clearly forbade rebellion. But today, due to the structure of power in democracies, we not only have a right of resistance, but a duty to resist oppressors. Løgstrup discusses the problem of how to maintain high standards (e.g. in education and culture) in a democratic society, because democracy involves the risk that the knowledge of experts will be set aside by the will of the uninformed many. Løgstrup also discusses democracy’s risk of becoming a utopian trust in progress and development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治
洛格斯特鲁普首先认为,路德时代的阶级社会与我们现代社会之间的差异意味着我们不能简单地将路德的理论应用于今天的问题。Løgstrup转向具体的政治问题:国家对文化的资助,非政府组织和压力团体的影响,以及外交政策中的外交规则。与路德有关的一个特别问题涉及到反抗的权利,因为路德和改革家们明确禁止反叛。但今天,由于民主国家的权力结构,我们不仅有反抗的权利,而且有反抗压迫者的义务。Løgstrup讨论了如何在民主社会中保持高标准(例如教育和文化)的问题,因为民主涉及到专家的知识将被不知情的许多人的意愿所抛弃的风险。洛格鲁普还讨论了民主在进步和发展中成为乌托邦式信任的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ethical Demand and the Norms Norm and Spontaneity Responsibility The Ethical Demand and the Sovereign Expressions of Life Three Ethical Traditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1