Enhancement of scoping review methodology to reflect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100096
Tina Brodie , Natasha J. Howard , Odette Pearson , Kootsy Canuto , Alex Brown , The Advisory Group
{"title":"Enhancement of scoping review methodology to reflect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing","authors":"Tina Brodie ,&nbsp;Natasha J. Howard ,&nbsp;Odette Pearson ,&nbsp;Kootsy Canuto ,&nbsp;Alex Brown ,&nbsp;The Advisory Group","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This paper argues for the enhancement of scoping review methods to incorporate Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing for more effective understandings of evidence of importance to Indigenous populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Scoping review methodology typically aims to understand existing evidence and support translation of evidence into practice. Levac and colleagues (2010) scoping review methodology stages: 1) Identify the research question; 2) Identify relevant studies; 3) Study selection; 4) Charting the data; 5) Collating, summarising, and reporting results; and 6) Consultation were considered from the perspective of Indigenous knowledges and adapted accordingly.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An enhanced method better aligns with Indigenous methodologies which are based on relationality, collaboration, partnership, reciprocity, and benefit. Consultation was redefined in this enhancement as <em>partnership</em> and integrated throughout scoping review stages, which are underpinned by key methodological principles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Enhancement of scoping review stages with Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing has the potential to strengthen the utility of scoping review methods to better meet the needs of and ensure relevance for Indigenous populations.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>These enhancements can increase the potential for knowledge translation and implementation of culturally relevant evidence-based approaches into practice for Indigenous populations and for other populations who experience health inequities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"47 6","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052731/pdfft?md5=6f9af17c9ecd65c2b354309e54c6be5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020023052731-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This paper argues for the enhancement of scoping review methods to incorporate Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing for more effective understandings of evidence of importance to Indigenous populations.

Methods

Scoping review methodology typically aims to understand existing evidence and support translation of evidence into practice. Levac and colleagues (2010) scoping review methodology stages: 1) Identify the research question; 2) Identify relevant studies; 3) Study selection; 4) Charting the data; 5) Collating, summarising, and reporting results; and 6) Consultation were considered from the perspective of Indigenous knowledges and adapted accordingly.

Results

An enhanced method better aligns with Indigenous methodologies which are based on relationality, collaboration, partnership, reciprocity, and benefit. Consultation was redefined in this enhancement as partnership and integrated throughout scoping review stages, which are underpinned by key methodological principles.

Conclusions

Enhancement of scoping review stages with Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing has the potential to strengthen the utility of scoping review methods to better meet the needs of and ensure relevance for Indigenous populations.

Implications for public health

These enhancements can increase the potential for knowledge translation and implementation of culturally relevant evidence-based approaches into practice for Indigenous populations and for other populations who experience health inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强范围审查方法,以反映土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的认识、存在和行为方式
本文主张加强范围审查方法,以纳入土著居民的认识、存在和行为方式,以更有效地理解对土著人口重要的证据。方法范围审查方法通常旨在理解现有证据并支持将证据转化为实践。Levac和同事(2010)范围审查方法论阶段:1)确定研究问题;2)识别相关研究;3)研究选择;4)绘制数据图;5)整理、总结和报告结果;6)从土著知识的角度考虑协商,并作出相应调整。结果改进后的方法更符合基于关系、协作、伙伴关系、互惠和利益的本土方法。在这次加强中,协商被重新定义为伙伴关系,并纳入以关键方法原则为基础的整个范围审查阶段。结论以土著居民的认识、存在和行为方式加强范围审查阶段,有可能加强范围审查方法的实用性,以更好地满足土著居民的需求并确保其相关性。对公共卫生的影响这些改进可以增加知识转化的潜力,并为土著居民和其他经历卫生不平等的人群实施与文化相关的循证方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Taking a strengths-based approach to mental health in rural communities: A systematic literature review Preliminary evaluation of a novel Aboriginal community–controlled prison health service for First Nations people A cross-sectional study of the experiences of distressed callers when accessing financial assistance from a telephone-based cancer information and support service Increasing awareness of sexually transmitted infections (STI) testing and addressing stigma may improve STI testing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Evidence from the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Psychedelic medicine and cultural responsiveness: A call for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement in Australian clinical trials and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1