Claudia Regina de Souza , Raul Edison Luna Lazo , Felipe Mainka, André Gaspar Zinco, Mariana Mengarda, Aline de Fátima Bonetti, Fábio Seigi Murakami
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of depression and anxiety: An umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Claudia Regina de Souza , Raul Edison Luna Lazo , Felipe Mainka, André Gaspar Zinco, Mariana Mengarda, Aline de Fátima Bonetti, Fábio Seigi Murakami","doi":"10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Depression and anxiety have several consequences on human health and are the most prevalent </span>mental disorders<span> in the world. The central nervous system<span><span> is known to be affected by the gut microbiota<span>. Therefore, the consumption of probiotics can act as an alternative for the </span></span>treatment of these disorders.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety through an overview of </span>systematic reviews<span> of randomized clinical trials.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2023. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246244). Efficacy and safety were assessed based on the results of depression and anxiety scale scores, and the adverse events reported. The quality of the studies and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and GRADE pro tools respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one systematic reviews were included. Some studies showed promising results for the use of probiotics in depression treatment. However, the AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that ten studies (47.6%) were rated as \"Moderate,\" four studies (19.0.%) as \"Low,\" and seven studies (33.4%) as \"Critically Low\" in terms of methodological quality. Regarding adverse events, only 5 studies report it. Based on the GRADE pro evaluation the force of recommendation probiotics for depression and anxiety is still strength remains weak.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>More systematic reviews with higher-quality, following meticulously recommended methodological guidelines should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics as intervention in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20049,"journal":{"name":"PharmaNutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmaNutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434423000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Depression and anxiety have several consequences on human health and are the most prevalent mental disorders in the world. The central nervous system is known to be affected by the gut microbiota. Therefore, the consumption of probiotics can act as an alternative for the treatment of these disorders.
Objectives
This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety through an overview of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials.
Methods
Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2023. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246244). Efficacy and safety were assessed based on the results of depression and anxiety scale scores, and the adverse events reported. The quality of the studies and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and GRADE pro tools respectively.
Results
Twenty-one systematic reviews were included. Some studies showed promising results for the use of probiotics in depression treatment. However, the AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that ten studies (47.6%) were rated as "Moderate," four studies (19.0.%) as "Low," and seven studies (33.4%) as "Critically Low" in terms of methodological quality. Regarding adverse events, only 5 studies report it. Based on the GRADE pro evaluation the force of recommendation probiotics for depression and anxiety is still strength remains weak.
Conclusion
More systematic reviews with higher-quality, following meticulously recommended methodological guidelines should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics as intervention in patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety.