{"title":"The laboratory perspective: Confirming the integrity of fingermark enhancement reagents","authors":"Roberto S.P. King, Beth McNash, Richard Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Validation is particularly important in forensic science. Each process utilised by a forensic laboratory will undergo validation to ensure it is functioning as expected. Some pieces of equipment (hardware) will be simple to validate, and this will be conducted regularly. However, many commonly employed fingermark enhancement reagents, such as ninhydrin and 1,2-Indandione, do not have clearly defined and robust validation parameters. To that end, artificial fingermark solutions, particularly amino acid solutions, have previously been investigated as a controlled validation method, <em>via</em> deposition onto a substrate. Whilst amino acid reagents are important, there is also a wider group of latent fingermark constituents (targets) that require the use of other enhancement reagents within the forensic laboratory. The work presented herein seeks to expand on the concept of amino acid printing, by exploring the possibilities of depositing a sebaceous solution matrix, thereby facilitating the testing of reagents such as Oil-Red-O and Physical Developer. In addition, we present a method that extends capabilities beyond fingermark enhancement reagents for porous substrates, by developing a methodology that enables process validation of the cyanoacrylate fuming technique to be easily facilitated. These simple and effective solutions have the capacity to serve as a crucial process validation check within the laboratory validation workflow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030623001089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Validation is particularly important in forensic science. Each process utilised by a forensic laboratory will undergo validation to ensure it is functioning as expected. Some pieces of equipment (hardware) will be simple to validate, and this will be conducted regularly. However, many commonly employed fingermark enhancement reagents, such as ninhydrin and 1,2-Indandione, do not have clearly defined and robust validation parameters. To that end, artificial fingermark solutions, particularly amino acid solutions, have previously been investigated as a controlled validation method, via deposition onto a substrate. Whilst amino acid reagents are important, there is also a wider group of latent fingermark constituents (targets) that require the use of other enhancement reagents within the forensic laboratory. The work presented herein seeks to expand on the concept of amino acid printing, by exploring the possibilities of depositing a sebaceous solution matrix, thereby facilitating the testing of reagents such as Oil-Red-O and Physical Developer. In addition, we present a method that extends capabilities beyond fingermark enhancement reagents for porous substrates, by developing a methodology that enables process validation of the cyanoacrylate fuming technique to be easily facilitated. These simple and effective solutions have the capacity to serve as a crucial process validation check within the laboratory validation workflow.
期刊介绍:
Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards.
Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector.
To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession.
To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews.
To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community.
To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed.
To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.