Networks of internationalizing digital platforms in physical place and digital space

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1495
Tamara Galkina, Irina Atkova, Francesca Ciulli
{"title":"Networks of internationalizing digital platforms in physical place and digital space","authors":"Tamara Galkina,&nbsp;Irina Atkova,&nbsp;Francesca Ciulli","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>The existing literature provides contradictory evidence on how digital platform firms establish network relations for internationalization. Some studies argue that they all but obviate the need for traditional relations in physical places. Others argue that these firms can suffer from overreliance on online interactions in digital space. We examine the coexistence of the network relations of international digital platform firms in physical place and digital space. Our multiple-case study identifies three coexistence mechanisms: reinforcement, separation, and simulation. These mechanisms are conditioned by three respective modes of bordering between physical place and digital space: soldering, interosculation, and division. We contribute to the network approach to internationalization and formulate implications for the concepts of location and borders in international business.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>International digital platform firms establish traditional network relations in physical places and rely heavily on online interactions in digital space. However, how do they combine their networking activities in these two localities? We examine the coexistence of the network relations of international digital platform firms in physical place and digital space and identify three coexistence mechanisms: reinforcement, separation, and simulation. These mechanisms are conditioned by three respective modes of bordering between physical place and digital space: soldering, interosculation, and division. We show that international platform companies, despite being digital in nature, are well advised to pay attention to not only digital but also actual physical networking, and that they come to see these as mutually nurturing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

The existing literature provides contradictory evidence on how digital platform firms establish network relations for internationalization. Some studies argue that they all but obviate the need for traditional relations in physical places. Others argue that these firms can suffer from overreliance on online interactions in digital space. We examine the coexistence of the network relations of international digital platform firms in physical place and digital space. Our multiple-case study identifies three coexistence mechanisms: reinforcement, separation, and simulation. These mechanisms are conditioned by three respective modes of bordering between physical place and digital space: soldering, interosculation, and division. We contribute to the network approach to internationalization and formulate implications for the concepts of location and borders in international business.

Managerial Summary

International digital platform firms establish traditional network relations in physical places and rely heavily on online interactions in digital space. However, how do they combine their networking activities in these two localities? We examine the coexistence of the network relations of international digital platform firms in physical place and digital space and identify three coexistence mechanisms: reinforcement, separation, and simulation. These mechanisms are conditioned by three respective modes of bordering between physical place and digital space: soldering, interosculation, and division. We show that international platform companies, despite being digital in nature, are well advised to pay attention to not only digital but also actual physical networking, and that they come to see these as mutually nurturing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理场所和数字空间的国际化数字平台网络
现有文献对数字平台企业如何建立国际化网络关系提供了相互矛盾的证据。一些研究认为,它们几乎消除了在物理场所建立传统关系的必要性。其他人则认为,这些公司可能会因过度依赖数字空间中的在线互动而遭受损失。我们研究了国际数字平台公司在物理场所和数字空间的网络关系共存。我们的多案例研究确定了三种共存机制:强化、分离和模拟。这些机制是由物理空间和数字空间之间的三种各自的边界模式所制约的:焊接、相互接触和分割。我们为国际化的网络方法做出了贡献,并为国际商业中的位置和边界概念制定了含义。国际数字平台公司在实体场所建立传统的网络关系,严重依赖数字空间中的在线互动。然而,他们如何将这两个地区的网络活动结合起来呢?我们研究了国际数字平台公司在物理场所和数字空间中的网络关系共存,并确定了三种共存机制:强化、分离和模拟。这些机制是由物理空间和数字空间之间的三种各自的边界模式所制约的:焊接、相互接触和分割。我们表明,尽管国际平台公司本质上是数字化的,但我们建议它们不仅要关注数字网络,还要关注实际的物理网络,并且它们将这两者视为相互促进的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Foreign institutional investors and equity share decisions in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions Do financial crises moderate the influence of stakeholder rights protection on M&A activity: The influence of institutional logics and power? Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1