“A bridge too far?” Ideas, employment relations and policy-making about the future of work

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1111/irel.12295
Susan Ainsworth, Angela Knox
{"title":"“A bridge too far?” Ideas, employment relations and policy-making about the future of work","authors":"Susan Ainsworth,&nbsp;Angela Knox","doi":"10.1111/irel.12295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing on ideational perspectives, we examine how ideas about the future of work and the discursive forms they take contribute to policy-making about employment relations and labor markets. Analyzing data from an Australian government Inquiry reporting on the future impact of technological and other work changes, we find that rather than being about these topics, the Inquiry focuses more on actors’ ideas regarding the present state of employment relations and education. Moreover, the incomplete nature of actors’ narratives, particularly about the temporally distant future, may account for government’s unwillingness and/or lack of preparedness to make more radical changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47700,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Relations","volume":"61 1","pages":"68-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irel.12295","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irel.12295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on ideational perspectives, we examine how ideas about the future of work and the discursive forms they take contribute to policy-making about employment relations and labor markets. Analyzing data from an Australian government Inquiry reporting on the future impact of technological and other work changes, we find that rather than being about these topics, the Inquiry focuses more on actors’ ideas regarding the present state of employment relations and education. Moreover, the incomplete nature of actors’ narratives, particularly about the temporally distant future, may account for government’s unwillingness and/or lack of preparedness to make more radical changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“桥太远了?”关于未来工作的想法、雇佣关系和政策制定
从观念的角度出发,我们研究了关于未来工作的想法以及它们所采取的话语形式如何有助于制定有关雇佣关系和劳动力市场的政策。分析来自澳大利亚政府关于技术和其他工作变化对未来影响的调查报告的数据,我们发现,调查更多地关注行为者关于就业关系和教育现状的想法,而不是关于这些主题。此外,行动者叙述的不完整性质,特别是关于暂时遥远的未来,可能解释了政府不愿意和/或缺乏准备进行更彻底的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial Relations
Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Corporate restructuring and downsizing, the changing employment relationship in union and nonunion settings, high performance work systems, the demographics of the workplace, and the impact of globalization on national labor markets - these are just some of the major issues covered in Industrial Relations. The journal offers an invaluable international perspective on economic, sociological, psychological, political, historical, and legal developments in labor and employment. It is the only journal in its field with this multidisciplinary focus on the implications of change for business, government and workers.
期刊最新文献
Dismissal protection and long‐term sickness absence: Evidence from a policy change Issue Information Drug Repurposing using consilience of Knowledge Graph Completion methods. Listed founding family firms and labor cost stickiness# It's not great, but it could be worse! Immigrant job quality in Canada through the lens of relative deprivation theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1