Modalities of monitoring: Evidence from cameras and recorders in policing

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101882
Andrew B. Whitford , Anna M. Whitford
{"title":"Modalities of monitoring: Evidence from cameras and recorders in policing","authors":"Andrew B. Whitford ,&nbsp;Anna M. Whitford","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All policy implementation environments that transfer authority to field agents incur principal-agency problems. Given the difficulty of choosing the right agent (solving the “adverse selection” problem), leaders of agencies look for ways to reduce “moral hazard” when agents take actions against the public interest. Increasingly, leaders try to reduce moral hazard by monitoring employees using data collection technologies. Cameras and recorders are examples of sensors – devices for collecting and transmitting multiple modalities of physical phenomena. We focus on cameras and recorders as mixtures of modalities of monitoring using policing data in the United States. Policing agencies use different mechanisms such as training and policies to reduce moral hazard by officers. We show that those mechanisms are associated with the use of different sensor modalities – but not all mechanisms are associated with all modalities. We also show that statistical models should account for the use of mixtures of different technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 101882"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All policy implementation environments that transfer authority to field agents incur principal-agency problems. Given the difficulty of choosing the right agent (solving the “adverse selection” problem), leaders of agencies look for ways to reduce “moral hazard” when agents take actions against the public interest. Increasingly, leaders try to reduce moral hazard by monitoring employees using data collection technologies. Cameras and recorders are examples of sensors – devices for collecting and transmitting multiple modalities of physical phenomena. We focus on cameras and recorders as mixtures of modalities of monitoring using policing data in the United States. Policing agencies use different mechanisms such as training and policies to reduce moral hazard by officers. We show that those mechanisms are associated with the use of different sensor modalities – but not all mechanisms are associated with all modalities. We also show that statistical models should account for the use of mixtures of different technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监控方式:警务中摄像机和记录仪的证据
所有将权力转移给现场代理的政策实施环境都会产生委托代理问题。考虑到选择合适的代理人的困难(解决“逆向选择”问题),当代理人采取违背公共利益的行动时,机构的领导人寻找减少“道德风险”的方法。越来越多的领导者试图通过使用数据收集技术来监控员工,从而降低道德风险。照相机和录音机是传感器的例子——用于收集和传输多种物理现象的设备。我们将重点放在摄像机和记录仪上,作为美国使用警务数据进行监控的混合模式。警务机构使用不同的机制,如培训和政策,以减少警察的道德风险。我们发现这些机制与不同传感器模式的使用有关,但并非所有机制都与所有模式有关。我们还表明,统计模型应该考虑到不同技术的混合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence for digital citizen participation: Design principles for a collective intelligence architecture Digital inclusion in public services for vulnerable groups: A systematic review for research themes and goal-action framework from the lens of public service ecosystem theory Editorial Board Best practices in e-government communication: Lessons from the local Governments' use of official facebook pages The haves and the have nots: Civic technologies and the pathways to government responsiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1