Young children’s subjective and objective thresholds and emergent processes of visual consciousness using a backward masking task

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103605
Ryoichi Watanabe , Yusuke Moriguchi
{"title":"Young children’s subjective and objective thresholds and emergent processes of visual consciousness using a backward masking task","authors":"Ryoichi Watanabe ,&nbsp;Yusuke Moriguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2023.103605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Visual consciousness studies in humans have primarily focused on adults. However, whether young children’s visual consciousness is similar to or different from that of adults remains unknown. This study examined young children’s and adults’ subjective awareness and objective discrimination for thresholds and emergent processes of visual consciousness in two experiments. In Experiment 1, 20 5–6-year-olds and 20 adults attempted a figure discrimination task using a square or a diamond as the target stimulus and responded, using a two-point scale, to a question on subjective awareness of the target stimulus with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) from 20 to 260 ms. In Experiment 2, 31 5–6-year-olds and 16 adults attempted the task and responded, using a four-point scale, to a question on subjective awareness with SOA from 50 to 550 ms. We measured the discrimination accuracy and the awareness scale with SOA and fit them to the sigmoid function. The results showed that the objective accuracy threshold of young children was larger than that of adults. Moreover, young children’s subjective awareness threshold was larger than that of adults in the four-point but not in the two-point scale responses. Finally, there were no age differences in the emergent process of consciousness. This study suggests that the emergent process of consciousness in young children is similar to that in adults, however, the threshold in young children is larger than that in adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810023001423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual consciousness studies in humans have primarily focused on adults. However, whether young children’s visual consciousness is similar to or different from that of adults remains unknown. This study examined young children’s and adults’ subjective awareness and objective discrimination for thresholds and emergent processes of visual consciousness in two experiments. In Experiment 1, 20 5–6-year-olds and 20 adults attempted a figure discrimination task using a square or a diamond as the target stimulus and responded, using a two-point scale, to a question on subjective awareness of the target stimulus with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) from 20 to 260 ms. In Experiment 2, 31 5–6-year-olds and 16 adults attempted the task and responded, using a four-point scale, to a question on subjective awareness with SOA from 50 to 550 ms. We measured the discrimination accuracy and the awareness scale with SOA and fit them to the sigmoid function. The results showed that the objective accuracy threshold of young children was larger than that of adults. Moreover, young children’s subjective awareness threshold was larger than that of adults in the four-point but not in the two-point scale responses. Finally, there were no age differences in the emergent process of consciousness. This study suggests that the emergent process of consciousness in young children is similar to that in adults, however, the threshold in young children is larger than that in adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿的主客观阈值与视觉意识的浮现过程
人类视觉意识的研究主要集中在成年人身上。然而,幼儿的视觉意识与成人是相似还是不同,目前还不清楚。本研究通过两个实验考察了幼儿和成人对视觉意识阈值和涌现过程的主观意识和客观辨别。实验1中,20名5 - 6岁儿童和20名成人分别以正方形或菱形为目标刺激物进行数字辨别任务,并在刺激开始异步(SOA)的20 ~ 260 ms时间内对目标刺激物的主观意识问题进行两分制的回答。在实验2中,31名5 - 6岁的儿童和16名成年人尝试了这项任务,并使用四分制回答了一个关于SOA主观意识的问题,回答时间为50到550毫秒。我们用SOA测量了识别精度和感知尺度,并拟合到s型函数中。结果表明,幼儿的客观准确度阈值大于成人。此外,幼儿的主观意识阈值在四分制的反应中大于成人,而在二分制的反应中则没有。最后,在意识的涌现过程中没有年龄差异。本研究表明,幼儿的意识涌现过程与成人相似,但幼儿的阈值比成人大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
Multiple independent components contribute to event-related potential correlates of conscious vision. Valence in perception: Are affective valence and visual brightness integral dimensions in visual experience? Action selection and simultaneously presented emotional sound and reward: Differential effects on implicit and explicit sense of agency. The influence of robot appearance on visual perspective taking: Testing the boundaries of the mere-appearance hypothesis The self and our perception of its synchrony – Beyond internal and external cognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1