Residual Risk of Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence in Patients Who Achieved Clear Lumpectomy Margins After Repeated Resection

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e46
{"title":"Residual Risk of Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence in Patients Who Achieved Clear Lumpectomy Margins After Repeated Resection","authors":"Jong-Ho Cheun, Hong-Kyu Kim, Han-Byoel Lee, Wonshik Han, Hyeong-Gon Moon","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nPatients with breast cancer with positive lumpectomy margins have a two-fold increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). This can be the result of either technically incomplete resection or the biological characteristics of the tumor that lead to a positive margin. We hypothesized that if achieving negative margins by re-excision nullifies the IBTR risk, then the increased risk is mainly attributed to the technical incompleteness of the initial surgeries. Thus, we investigated IBTR rates in patients with breast cancer who achieved clear margins after re-excision.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent breast lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2018 at a single institution, and investigated IBTR events.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong 5,598 patients, 793 achieved clear margins after re-excision of their initial positive margins. During the median follow-up period of 76.4 months, 121 (2.2%) patients experienced IBTR. Patients who underwent re-excision to achieve negative margin experienced significantly higher IBTR rates compared to those achieving clear margin at first lumpectomy (10-year IBTR rate: 5.3% vs. 2.6% [25 vs. 84 events]; unadjusted p = 0.031, hazard ratio, 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.48; adjusted p = 0.030, hazard ratio, 1.69, 95% CI, 1.05-2.72). This difference was more evident in patients aged < 50 years and those with delayed IBTR. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed in the spatial distribution of IBTR locations.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPatients who underwent re-excision for initial positive margins had an increased risk of IBTR, even after achieving a final negative margin, compared to patients with negative margins initially. This increased risk of IBTR is mostly observed in young patients and delayed cases.","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e46","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with breast cancer with positive lumpectomy margins have a two-fold increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). This can be the result of either technically incomplete resection or the biological characteristics of the tumor that lead to a positive margin. We hypothesized that if achieving negative margins by re-excision nullifies the IBTR risk, then the increased risk is mainly attributed to the technical incompleteness of the initial surgeries. Thus, we investigated IBTR rates in patients with breast cancer who achieved clear margins after re-excision. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent breast lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2018 at a single institution, and investigated IBTR events. RESULTS Among 5,598 patients, 793 achieved clear margins after re-excision of their initial positive margins. During the median follow-up period of 76.4 months, 121 (2.2%) patients experienced IBTR. Patients who underwent re-excision to achieve negative margin experienced significantly higher IBTR rates compared to those achieving clear margin at first lumpectomy (10-year IBTR rate: 5.3% vs. 2.6% [25 vs. 84 events]; unadjusted p = 0.031, hazard ratio, 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.48; adjusted p = 0.030, hazard ratio, 1.69, 95% CI, 1.05-2.72). This difference was more evident in patients aged < 50 years and those with delayed IBTR. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed in the spatial distribution of IBTR locations. CONCLUSION Patients who underwent re-excision for initial positive margins had an increased risk of IBTR, even after achieving a final negative margin, compared to patients with negative margins initially. This increased risk of IBTR is mostly observed in young patients and delayed cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复切除后获得清晰乳房肿瘤切除边缘的患者同侧肿瘤复发的剩余风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer patients who achieved pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
IF 45.3 1区 医学Journal of Clinical OncologyPub Date : 2020-05-25 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e12599
Mizuho Tazo, Y. Kojima, A. Yoshida, Sayuka Nakayama, R. Tokui, T. Ogawa, T. Kuwayama, T. Nakayama, H. Yamauchi, K. Tsugawa, Seigo Nakamura, N. Hayashi, M. Ishitobi
Abstract P2-16-27: Risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in primary breast cancer patients who achieved pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
IF 11.2 1区 医学Cancer researchPub Date : 2020-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-16-27
N. Matsuda, N. Hayashi, R. Tokui, T. Nakayama, H. Yamauchi, M. Ishitobi
Risk Factors Predictive of Recurrence and Progression for Patients Who Suffered Initial Recurrence After Transurethral Resection of Stage pT1 Bladder Tumor in Chinese Population: A Retrospective Study
IF 1.6 4区 医学MedicinePub Date : 2016-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002625
Zhonghua Shen, Linguo Xie, Tao Chen, Dawei Tian, Xiaoteng Liu, Hao Xu, Yu Zhang, Zhouliang Wu, N. Sha, Chen Xing, Na Ding, Hailong Hu, Chang-li Wu
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
期刊最新文献
Differences in HER2-0 and HER2-low Breast Cancer: Androgen Receptor and Programmed Death Ligand 1 as Predictive Factors. Impact of HER2-Low Status on Pathologic Complete Response and Survival Outcome Among Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Letter to the Editor: "Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer". Reply to "Letter to the Editor: Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer". The Incidence of Occult Malignancy in Contralateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy Among Affected Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Carriers in South Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1