Quality of anticoagulation with the use of warfarin in long-term care in a tertiary care hospital using time spent in therapeutic range as a predictive parameter

Ali A. Al Bshabshe, Mir Nadeem, Ahmed M. Assiri, Javed Iqbal Wani, Shahid Aziz, Zia Ul Sabah, Nawaf A. Alqahtani, Fayez Mohammed Alshehri, Riyadh F. Alshubily, Ali M. Alqahtani
{"title":"Quality of anticoagulation with the use of warfarin in long-term care in a tertiary care hospital using time spent in therapeutic range as a predictive parameter","authors":"Ali A. Al Bshabshe, Mir Nadeem, Ahmed M. Assiri, Javed Iqbal Wani, Shahid Aziz, Zia Ul Sabah, Nawaf A. Alqahtani, Fayez Mohammed Alshehri, Riyadh F. Alshubily, Ali M. Alqahtani","doi":"10.4103/abhs.abhs_13_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Warfarin was a frequently prescribed long-term anticoagulant before the advent of novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants. These drugs are used for the primary or secondary prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or for the treatment and prophylactic prevention of venous thromboembolism. This study aimed to assess the anticoagulation control of patients receiving warfarin at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an anticoagulation clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia and included 113 patients who had been treated with warfarin for at least 3 months. Thereafter, the international normalized ratio results were collected for 3 years. Anticoagulation control was assessed by calculating time within the therapeutic range (TTR) as per the Rosendaal method. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age, 56 ± 17.6 years; 64.6% of females) were included. The mean TTR was 48.1%. Almost one-third of the patients (31.3%) had poor anticoagulation control defined as a TTR of <50%. Poor anticoagulation control was significantly associated with a higher CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and stroke/transient ischemic attack) score ( P = 0.043). TTR did not differ significantly between men and women, and it was not associated with age or anticoagulation therapy duration. Conclusion: Anticoagulation quality was suboptimal in patients receiving warfarin in a tertiary care hospital, with nearly 41% of time spent outside the therapeutic range. Methods should be implemented to improve anticoagulation control in appropriate patient groups.","PeriodicalId":158834,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_13_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Warfarin was a frequently prescribed long-term anticoagulant before the advent of novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants. These drugs are used for the primary or secondary prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or for the treatment and prophylactic prevention of venous thromboembolism. This study aimed to assess the anticoagulation control of patients receiving warfarin at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an anticoagulation clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia and included 113 patients who had been treated with warfarin for at least 3 months. Thereafter, the international normalized ratio results were collected for 3 years. Anticoagulation control was assessed by calculating time within the therapeutic range (TTR) as per the Rosendaal method. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age, 56 ± 17.6 years; 64.6% of females) were included. The mean TTR was 48.1%. Almost one-third of the patients (31.3%) had poor anticoagulation control defined as a TTR of <50%. Poor anticoagulation control was significantly associated with a higher CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and stroke/transient ischemic attack) score ( P = 0.043). TTR did not differ significantly between men and women, and it was not associated with age or anticoagulation therapy duration. Conclusion: Anticoagulation quality was suboptimal in patients receiving warfarin in a tertiary care hospital, with nearly 41% of time spent outside the therapeutic range. Methods should be implemented to improve anticoagulation control in appropriate patient groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级医院长期护理中使用华法林的抗凝质量,使用治疗范围时间作为预测参数
背景:在新型口服抗凝剂或直接口服抗凝剂出现之前,华法林是一种常用的长期抗凝剂。这些药物用于房颤患者脑卒中的一级或二级预防,或用于静脉血栓栓塞的治疗和预防性预防。本研究旨在评估三级医院接受华法林治疗的患者的抗凝控制。方法:本回顾性队列研究在沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院抗凝门诊进行,纳入113例接受华法林治疗至少3个月的患者。此后,收集了3年的国际标准化比率结果。根据Rosendaal方法计算治疗范围内时间(TTR)来评估抗凝控制。结果:共113例患者(平均年龄56±17.6岁;包括64.6%的女性)。平均TTR为48.1%。几乎三分之一的患者(31.3%)抗凝控制不良,定义为TTR为50%。抗凝控制不良与较高的CHADS2(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄、糖尿病和卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作)评分显著相关(P = 0.043)。TTR在男性和女性之间没有显著差异,并且与年龄或抗凝治疗时间无关。结论:三级医院接受华法林治疗的患者抗凝质量不理想,近41%的时间在治疗范围外。应采取措施改善适当患者群体的抗凝控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finding the role of thiamine in peri-operative bariatric surgery and the value of thiamine screening Awareness of the use of personal protective equipment among construction workers Laparoscopic management of iatrogenic colonic rupture The effects of sensory modulation on patient's distress and use of restrictive interventions in adult inpatient psychiatric settings: A critical review Can artificial intelligence assist physicians in selecting the right medications for patients with diabetes mellitus, improve outcomes, and reduce financial burdens on health-care systems?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1