Communication aimed at engendering trustworthiness: An analysis of CSR messages on Twitter

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1111/beer.12609
Ewelina Zarzycka, Joanna Krasodomska, Dorota Dobija, Wojciech Grabowski, Dariusz Jemielniak
{"title":"Communication aimed at engendering trustworthiness: An analysis of CSR messages on Twitter","authors":"Ewelina Zarzycka,&nbsp;Joanna Krasodomska,&nbsp;Dorota Dobija,&nbsp;Wojciech Grabowski,&nbsp;Dariusz Jemielniak","doi":"10.1111/beer.12609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing body of research is exploring corporate communication in relation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on social media (SM). Nonetheless, while these studies have shown that SM communication may be an effective tool for reaching and engaging various stakeholders, how the design of corporate CSR communication engenders trustworthiness has yet to be examined. To address this gap, we suggest that SM communication may include important signals related to trust; thus, we investigate whether companies use sources of trustworthiness (reputation, performance, and appearance) while communicating with stakeholders and the response of the latter to such communication. Our empirical analysis is based on a database containing over 66,000 CSR-related messages from eight companies focusing on communication extracted from Twitter. These data are coded according to three sources of trustworthiness and two dimensions of CSR communication (social and environmental). Our findings indicate that all three attributes of trustworthiness are used by companies in their CSR social media communication. We also document how corporate efforts to use CSR communication that engenders trustworthiness influence stakeholder engagement. Our study therefore contributes to the literature on trust in relation to CSR by illustrating the importance of signaling that includes different sources of trustworthiness or their combination in corporate communication. By analyzing how the various trust attributes included in CSR communication affect SM reactions, we also identify which attributes lead to greater stakeholder engagement overall, particularly for the two analyzed dimensions of CSR communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"33 3","pages":"363-379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of research is exploring corporate communication in relation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on social media (SM). Nonetheless, while these studies have shown that SM communication may be an effective tool for reaching and engaging various stakeholders, how the design of corporate CSR communication engenders trustworthiness has yet to be examined. To address this gap, we suggest that SM communication may include important signals related to trust; thus, we investigate whether companies use sources of trustworthiness (reputation, performance, and appearance) while communicating with stakeholders and the response of the latter to such communication. Our empirical analysis is based on a database containing over 66,000 CSR-related messages from eight companies focusing on communication extracted from Twitter. These data are coded according to three sources of trustworthiness and two dimensions of CSR communication (social and environmental). Our findings indicate that all three attributes of trustworthiness are used by companies in their CSR social media communication. We also document how corporate efforts to use CSR communication that engenders trustworthiness influence stakeholder engagement. Our study therefore contributes to the literature on trust in relation to CSR by illustrating the importance of signaling that includes different sources of trustworthiness or their combination in corporate communication. By analyzing how the various trust attributes included in CSR communication affect SM reactions, we also identify which attributes lead to greater stakeholder engagement overall, particularly for the two analyzed dimensions of CSR communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旨在提高可信度的传播:推特上的企业社会责任信息分析
越来越多的研究正在探索与社交媒体(SM)上的企业社会责任(CSR)活动相关的企业传播。然而,尽管这些研究表明社交媒体传播可能是接触和吸引各种利益相关者的有效工具,但企业社会责任传播的设计如何产生可信度还有待研究。为了弥补这一不足,我们认为 SM 传播可能包含与信任相关的重要信号;因此,我们研究了企业在与利益相关者进行传播时是否使用了可信度来源(声誉、业绩和外观),以及利益相关者对此类传播的反应。我们的实证分析基于一个数据库,该数据库包含来自八家公司的 66,000 多条与企业社会责任相关的信息,重点是从 Twitter 上提取的沟通信息。这些数据按照可信度的三个来源和企业社会责任传播的两个维度(社会和环境)进行编码。我们的研究结果表明,企业在其企业社会责任社交媒体传播中使用了可信度的所有三个属性。我们还记录了企业如何努力利用企业社会责任传播来提高可信度,从而影响利益相关者的参与度。因此,我们的研究说明了企业传播中包含不同可信度来源或其组合的信号传递的重要性,从而为与企业社会责任相关的信任文献做出了贡献。通过分析企业社会责任沟通中包含的各种信任属性如何影响 SM 的反应,我们还确定了哪些属性会在整体上提高利益相关者的参与度,特别是对于企业社会责任沟通的两个分析维度而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Reimagining the sustainable consumer: Why social representations of sustainable consumption matter Consultants as discreet corporate change agents for sustainability: Transforming organizations from the outside-in
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1