Chromolaena odorata Linn leaf extract – Geothermal versus nongeothermal: Phytochemical, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity screenings

IF 1.4 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/japtr.japtr_286_23
Azzaki Abubakar, Hanifah Yusuf, Maimun Syukri, Rosnani Nasution, Rinaldi Idroes
{"title":"Chromolaena odorata Linn leaf extract – Geothermal versus nongeothermal: Phytochemical, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity screenings","authors":"Azzaki Abubakar, Hanifah Yusuf, Maimun Syukri, Rosnani Nasution, Rinaldi Idroes","doi":"10.4103/japtr.japtr_286_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chromolaena odorata Linn, a popular yet underutilized ethnomedicinal plant, is hypothesized to possess higher bioactive phytoconstituents when it grows in geothermal areas. In this study, the comparison of ethanolic extract from geothermal and nongeothermal C. odorata leaves was carried out based on the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity. The leaf extracts were produced from a maceration using ethanol 96%, where the products were identified using reagents and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Antioxidant activities of both samples were measured based on their 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities. Cytotoxicity was determined by brine shrimp lethality test using Artemia salina. Phenols were found to be more abundant in geothermal sample based on the qualitative screening and GC-MS analysis (i.e. higher relative abundance of phytol – 3.97%). DPPH antioxidant was higher in geothermal sample than in nongeothermal sample (median inhibitory concentration =13.04 ± 3.35 mg/L vs. 41.09 ± 4.13 mg/L, respectively). Geothermal sample was noncytotoxic (median lethal concentration [LC50] =2139.30 mg/L), whereas the nongeothermal sample had low cytotoxicity (LC50 = 491.48 mg/L). Taken altogether, geothermal C. odorata leaves contain higher bioactive compounds with potent antioxidant activities.","PeriodicalId":14877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_286_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chromolaena odorata Linn, a popular yet underutilized ethnomedicinal plant, is hypothesized to possess higher bioactive phytoconstituents when it grows in geothermal areas. In this study, the comparison of ethanolic extract from geothermal and nongeothermal C. odorata leaves was carried out based on the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity. The leaf extracts were produced from a maceration using ethanol 96%, where the products were identified using reagents and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Antioxidant activities of both samples were measured based on their 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities. Cytotoxicity was determined by brine shrimp lethality test using Artemia salina. Phenols were found to be more abundant in geothermal sample based on the qualitative screening and GC-MS analysis (i.e. higher relative abundance of phytol – 3.97%). DPPH antioxidant was higher in geothermal sample than in nongeothermal sample (median inhibitory concentration =13.04 ± 3.35 mg/L vs. 41.09 ± 4.13 mg/L, respectively). Geothermal sample was noncytotoxic (median lethal concentration [LC50] =2139.30 mg/L), whereas the nongeothermal sample had low cytotoxicity (LC50 = 491.48 mg/L). Taken altogether, geothermal C. odorata leaves contain higher bioactive compounds with potent antioxidant activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臭草叶提取物-地热与非地热:植物化学、抗氧化和细胞毒性筛选
臭草是一种受欢迎但未被充分利用的民族药用植物,当它生长在地热地区时,被假设具有更高的生物活性植物成分。在本研究中,从植物化学特征、抗氧化活性和细胞毒性等方面比较了地热和非地热香樟叶的乙醇提取物。用96%的乙醇浸渍生产叶提取物,其中产品使用试剂和气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)进行鉴定。通过对2,2-二苯基-1-苦味酰肼(DPPH)的清除活性测定两种样品的抗氧化活性。采用盐蒿盐虾致死试验测定细胞毒性。通过定性筛选和GC-MS分析,发现地热样品中酚类物质含量较高(叶绿醇相对丰度为3.97%)。DPPH抗氧化剂在地热样品中的抑制浓度中位数分别为13.04±3.35 mg/L和41.09±4.13 mg/L,高于非地热样品。地热样品无细胞毒性(中位致死浓度[LC50] =2139.30 mg/L),而非地热样品具有低细胞毒性(LC50 = 491.48 mg/L)。综上所述,地热臭椿叶含有较高的生物活性化合物,具有有效的抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research (JAPTR) is an Official Publication of Society of Pharmaceutical Education & Research™. It is an international journal published Quarterly. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research (JAPTR) is available in online and print version. It is a peer reviewed journal aiming to communicate high quality original research work, reviews, short communications, case report, Ethics Forum, Education Forum and Letter to editor that contribute significantly to further the scientific knowledge related to the field of Pharmacy i.e. Pharmaceutics, Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy, Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Articles with timely interest and newer research concepts will be given more preference.
期刊最新文献
Potential antioxidant and antiradical agents from Allium ascalonicum: Superoxide dismutase and density functional theory in silico studies. Potential target and mechanism exploration from α-mangostin against triple-negative breast cancer: An in silico study. Role of Moringa oleifera irrigation solution on the cell metabolism change of Streptococcus mutans. Bioadhesive polymer in antifungal drug delivery for therapeutic treatment of candidiasis. Botanical and pharmacognostic investigation of Strobilanthes kalimantanensis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1