Model Adequacy Checking in Homogeneity and Stability Studies

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION MAPAN Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s12647-023-00695-1
Luiz Henrique da Conceição Leal, Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha
{"title":"Model Adequacy Checking in Homogeneity and Stability Studies","authors":"Luiz Henrique da Conceição Leal,&nbsp;Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho Rocha","doi":"10.1007/s12647-023-00695-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The production of reference materials necessitates, among other factors, evaluations of homogeneity and stability. The aim of the homogeneity study is to ensure uniformity in property values across all samples. On the other hand, stability pertains to a sample’s ability to retain its property value over time. ISO Guide 35 dictates that homogeneity, between and within samples, is appraised using a one-way random effects analysis of variance, while stability is gauged by a univariate linear regression model. Both these statistical techniques presuppose the normality and homoscedasticity of the residuals. Notably, the ISO Guide 35 standard omits any reference to the assumption of homoscedasticity in its prescribed statistical methods. This communication introduces the Shapiro–Wilk and Koenker–Bassett tests as tools to verify the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, respectively. Moreover, it advances the feasible generalized least squares method as a remedy for instances where these assumptions are breached. Initial findings suggest that, in certain scenarios, breaches in statistical model assumptions might influence evaluations of homogeneity and/or stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-023-00695-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of reference materials necessitates, among other factors, evaluations of homogeneity and stability. The aim of the homogeneity study is to ensure uniformity in property values across all samples. On the other hand, stability pertains to a sample’s ability to retain its property value over time. ISO Guide 35 dictates that homogeneity, between and within samples, is appraised using a one-way random effects analysis of variance, while stability is gauged by a univariate linear regression model. Both these statistical techniques presuppose the normality and homoscedasticity of the residuals. Notably, the ISO Guide 35 standard omits any reference to the assumption of homoscedasticity in its prescribed statistical methods. This communication introduces the Shapiro–Wilk and Koenker–Bassett tests as tools to verify the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, respectively. Moreover, it advances the feasible generalized least squares method as a remedy for instances where these assumptions are breached. Initial findings suggest that, in certain scenarios, breaches in statistical model assumptions might influence evaluations of homogeneity and/or stability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同质性和稳定性研究中的模型充分性检查
除其他因素外,标准物质的生产还需要对均匀性和稳定性进行评估。均匀性研究的目的是确保所有样本的属性值一致。另一方面,稳定性与样品长期保持其属性值的能力有关。ISO 指南 35 规定,样本间和样本内的同质性采用单向随机效应方差分析进行评估,而稳定性则采用单变量线性回归模型进行衡量。这两种统计技术都以残差的正态性和同方差性为前提。值得注意的是,ISO 指南 35 标准在其规定的统计方法中没有提及同方差假设。本文介绍了 Shapiro-Wilk 检验和 Koenker-Bassett 检验,分别作为验证正态性和同方差假设的工具。此外,它还提出了可行的广义最小二乘法,作为对违反这些假设的情况的补救措施。初步研究结果表明,在某些情况下,统计模型假设的违背可能会影响对同质性和/或稳定性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
期刊最新文献
Optical Wavelength Calibration for Stabilized He–Ne laser 633 nm Using Substitution Method Long–Term Characteristics of Ambient Trace gases and Meteorology in Delhi, India Dimensional Metrology: Underpinning the Automotive Sector in an Indelible Fashion Measurement of Heavy Metals Content in Suspended Sediment of Ganges River Using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Study on Measurement of CxHy Outgassing Rate Based on the Correction for Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer Mass Discrimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1