Introduction to the Thematic Series: Use and consequences of family policies among migrants and their descendants in Europe

IF 2.1 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Genus Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1186/s41118-023-00204-x
Eleonora Mussino, Elisabeth Kraus, Nadja Milewski
{"title":"Introduction to the Thematic Series: Use and consequences of family policies among migrants and their descendants in Europe","authors":"Eleonora Mussino, Elisabeth Kraus, Nadja Milewski","doi":"10.1186/s41118-023-00204-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is the introduction to the Thematic Series Use and consequences of family policies among migrants and their descendants in Europe . The study contexts are countries in different Western European regions: Belgium, France, Germany, and Italy. Despite their differences with respect to welfare-state types in general and family policies in particular, these countries also vary when it comes to their immigration histories and current migrant populations. Yet, the fast-growing field of research on the effects of family polices on family and fertility behavior as well as work-family reconciliation has virtually overlooked migrants. To address this void in the existing literature, this Thematic Series raises two research questions: To what degree do family policies include, and are used by, migrants and their descendants? And, to what extent do such polices promote migrants’ integration into European societies? The collection contains six empirical articles investigating either eligibility or use and consequences of two specific family policy measures: parental leave and external childcare. Collectively, the studies show significant disadvantages among migrant groups in eligibility for family policy measures, and consequently in their use and impacts on further life-course patterns, compared to majority populations. They also demonstrate diverging patterns within migrant populations.","PeriodicalId":35741,"journal":{"name":"Genus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-023-00204-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article is the introduction to the Thematic Series Use and consequences of family policies among migrants and their descendants in Europe . The study contexts are countries in different Western European regions: Belgium, France, Germany, and Italy. Despite their differences with respect to welfare-state types in general and family policies in particular, these countries also vary when it comes to their immigration histories and current migrant populations. Yet, the fast-growing field of research on the effects of family polices on family and fertility behavior as well as work-family reconciliation has virtually overlooked migrants. To address this void in the existing literature, this Thematic Series raises two research questions: To what degree do family policies include, and are used by, migrants and their descendants? And, to what extent do such polices promote migrants’ integration into European societies? The collection contains six empirical articles investigating either eligibility or use and consequences of two specific family policy measures: parental leave and external childcare. Collectively, the studies show significant disadvantages among migrant groups in eligibility for family policy measures, and consequently in their use and impacts on further life-course patterns, compared to majority populations. They also demonstrate diverging patterns within migrant populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专题系列导言:欧洲移民及其后代家庭政策的使用和后果
摘要本文介绍了欧洲移民及其后代家庭政策的使用和后果。研究背景是西欧不同地区的国家:比利时、法国、德国和意大利。尽管这些国家在福利国家类型、特别是家庭政策方面存在差异,但在移民历史和当前移民人口方面也存在差异。然而,关于家庭政策对家庭和生育行为以及工作-家庭和解的影响的快速发展的研究领域实际上忽略了移民。为了解决现有文献中的这一空白,本专题系列提出了两个研究问题:家庭政策在多大程度上包括移民及其后代,并被他们使用?这些政策在多大程度上促进了移民融入欧洲社会?该集合包含六个实证文章调查资格或使用和后果的两个具体的家庭政策措施:育婴假和外部托儿服务。总的来说,这些研究表明,与大多数人口相比,移徙群体在获得家庭政策措施的资格方面,因而在这些措施的使用和对今后生命历程模式的影响方面处于明显劣势。它们在移民人口中也显示出不同的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genus
Genus Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of life expectancy differentials with (and without) conditions by educational attainment for major groups of causes in contemporary Spain: where is the advantage? Marital quality in a context of displacement: the role of union formation characteristics among Syrian refugee and Jordanian youth Gender composition of children and desires for the next child in “son preference” countries Peasant families and farm size in Fascist Italy School absence of adolescents from single-parent families in Andalusia (Spain): exploring the mediating and moderating role of economic and social resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1