The Motivation to Be Inclusive: Understanding How Diversity Self-Efficacy Impacts Leader Effectiveness in Racially Diverse Workgroups

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1177/10596011231200929
Lawrence Houston, Maria Kraimer, Pauline Schilpzand
{"title":"The Motivation to Be Inclusive: Understanding How Diversity Self-Efficacy Impacts Leader Effectiveness in Racially Diverse Workgroups","authors":"Lawrence Houston, Maria Kraimer, Pauline Schilpzand","doi":"10.1177/10596011231200929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diversity management is becoming integral to leaders’ success, given the influx of diversity in today’s organizations and workgroups. Yet, little is known about why some leaders and not others are effective at leading a racially diverse group of employees. To shed light on this important conundrum, we integrate social cognitive theory with the categorization-elaboration model of workgroup diversity (Van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004) to advance a theoretical model that identifies how leaders’ diversity self-efficacy may be positively related to followers’ evaluations of leader effectiveness. We further hypothesize that leaders’ inclusive leadership behavior explains why those leaders who feel efficacious in leading diverse work groups would be deemed more effective, particularly when these leaders’ workgroups are more racially diverse. Based on a sample of 101 group leaders and 1470 healthcare professionals who worked in interdependent workgroups to provide quality patient care (Study 1) and a sample of 135 leader-follower dyads from various industries (Study 2), our data show that leaders’ diversity self-efficacy was more strongly related to followers’ evaluation of leader effectiveness when there were higher levels of racial diversity within workgroups. The data also indicate that the extent to which leaders engage in inclusive leadership behavior can explain why leaders’ diversity self-efficacy beliefs are positively related to followers’ evaluations of leader effectiveness and that the mediation of inclusive leadership behavior is stronger when workgroups are more racially diverse. Our study highlights the importance of leaders’ diversity self-efficacy beliefs in fostering an inclusive and effective work environment.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231200929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diversity management is becoming integral to leaders’ success, given the influx of diversity in today’s organizations and workgroups. Yet, little is known about why some leaders and not others are effective at leading a racially diverse group of employees. To shed light on this important conundrum, we integrate social cognitive theory with the categorization-elaboration model of workgroup diversity (Van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004) to advance a theoretical model that identifies how leaders’ diversity self-efficacy may be positively related to followers’ evaluations of leader effectiveness. We further hypothesize that leaders’ inclusive leadership behavior explains why those leaders who feel efficacious in leading diverse work groups would be deemed more effective, particularly when these leaders’ workgroups are more racially diverse. Based on a sample of 101 group leaders and 1470 healthcare professionals who worked in interdependent workgroups to provide quality patient care (Study 1) and a sample of 135 leader-follower dyads from various industries (Study 2), our data show that leaders’ diversity self-efficacy was more strongly related to followers’ evaluation of leader effectiveness when there were higher levels of racial diversity within workgroups. The data also indicate that the extent to which leaders engage in inclusive leadership behavior can explain why leaders’ diversity self-efficacy beliefs are positively related to followers’ evaluations of leader effectiveness and that the mediation of inclusive leadership behavior is stronger when workgroups are more racially diverse. Our study highlights the importance of leaders’ diversity self-efficacy beliefs in fostering an inclusive and effective work environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容的动机:了解多元化自我效能如何影响不同种族工作小组的领导效能
考虑到当今组织和工作组中多样性的涌入,多元化管理正成为领导者成功不可或缺的一部分。然而,为什么有些领导者能有效地领导一个种族多元化的员工群体,而其他人却没有,我们知之甚少。为了阐明这一重要难题,我们将社会认知理论与工作组多样性的分类-细化模型(Van Knippenberg, De Dreu, &Homan(2004)提出了一个理论模型,该模型确定了领导者的多样性自我效能如何与追随者对领导者有效性的评价呈正相关。我们进一步假设,领导者的包容性领导行为解释了为什么那些在领导多元化工作小组时感觉有效的领导者会被认为更有效,特别是当这些领导者的工作小组更加种族多元化时。基于在相互依赖的工作小组中工作以提供高质量患者护理的101名小组领导和1470名医疗保健专业人员的样本(研究1)和来自不同行业的135名领导-追随者二人组(研究2)的样本,我们的数据表明,当工作小组中种族多样性水平较高时,领导者的多样性自我效能感与追随者对领导者有效性的评价之间的相关性更强。数据还表明,领导者参与包容性领导行为的程度可以解释为什么领导者的多样性自我效能信念与追随者对领导者有效性的评价呈正相关,并且当工作群体的种族多样性越高时,包容性领导行为的中介作用越强。我们的研究强调了领导者多样性自我效能感信念在促进包容和有效的工作环境中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Drivers for Nominating First Women Executives: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Firms The Value of Small Samples to Groups and Teams Research: Accumulating Knowledge across Philosophies of Science It’s About Time! Understanding the Dynamic Team Process-Performance Relationship Using Micro- and Macroscale Time Lenses Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare When Does Entrepreneurs’ Impression Management Enhance Their Networking Performance? The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Collective Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1