The gendered nature of educational development in the United States

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Academic Development Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1080/1360144x.2023.2252794
Emily O. Gravett, Laurie L. McCarty, Lindsay Bernhagen
{"title":"The gendered nature of educational development in the United States","authors":"Emily O. Gravett, Laurie L. McCarty, Lindsay Bernhagen","doi":"10.1080/1360144x.2023.2252794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRecent research has explored the role of gender in educational development. International and national studies have shown that women predominate the field. In 2017, Bernhagen and Gravett analyzed the gendered nature of educational development in the U.S. specifically. What went unaddressed were the identities of the faculty served. Despite recent research from the U.S. that concluded gender is not predictive of participation, past literature, as well as our own lived experiences, suggests that there is an overrepresentation of women in center programming. In this article, we explore possible explanations for this imbalance, as well as potential consequences and solutions.KEYWORDS: CTLsdiversitygenderprofessional developmentwomen Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsEmily O. GravettEmily O. Gravett is currently an assistant director in the Center for Faculty Innovation and an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy & Religion at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA. She has been in the field of educational development for over a decade and has published widely in journals such as the International Journal for Academic Development, To Improve the Academy, and the Journal of Faculty Development.Laurie L. McCartyLaurie L. McCarty is an experienced faculty member, educational developer, and higher education administrator. Her research interests include bilingual special education, change leadership, educational development, and reflective practice. In her faculty and leadership roles, she has engaged in efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion while supporting faculty in all aspects of their professional growth.Lindsay BernhagenLindsay Bernhagen is a learning strategist at Torch, a company that facilitates coaching and mentorship in professional settings. Before that, she was the director of the Center for Inclusive Teaching and Learning at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (UWSP). She worked in educational development for over a decade, publishing, presenting, and consulting on issues of equity and identity in education. Lindsay continues to teach courses and advise graduate students in the Educational Sustainability doctoral program at UWSP.","PeriodicalId":47146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Academic Development","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Academic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2023.2252794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRecent research has explored the role of gender in educational development. International and national studies have shown that women predominate the field. In 2017, Bernhagen and Gravett analyzed the gendered nature of educational development in the U.S. specifically. What went unaddressed were the identities of the faculty served. Despite recent research from the U.S. that concluded gender is not predictive of participation, past literature, as well as our own lived experiences, suggests that there is an overrepresentation of women in center programming. In this article, we explore possible explanations for this imbalance, as well as potential consequences and solutions.KEYWORDS: CTLsdiversitygenderprofessional developmentwomen Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsEmily O. GravettEmily O. Gravett is currently an assistant director in the Center for Faculty Innovation and an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy & Religion at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA. She has been in the field of educational development for over a decade and has published widely in journals such as the International Journal for Academic Development, To Improve the Academy, and the Journal of Faculty Development.Laurie L. McCartyLaurie L. McCarty is an experienced faculty member, educational developer, and higher education administrator. Her research interests include bilingual special education, change leadership, educational development, and reflective practice. In her faculty and leadership roles, she has engaged in efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion while supporting faculty in all aspects of their professional growth.Lindsay BernhagenLindsay Bernhagen is a learning strategist at Torch, a company that facilitates coaching and mentorship in professional settings. Before that, she was the director of the Center for Inclusive Teaching and Learning at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (UWSP). She worked in educational development for over a decade, publishing, presenting, and consulting on issues of equity and identity in education. Lindsay continues to teach courses and advise graduate students in the Educational Sustainability doctoral program at UWSP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国教育发展的性别本质
摘要近年来的研究对性别在教育发展中的作用进行了探讨。国际和国内研究表明,妇女在这一领域占主导地位。2017年,Bernhagen和Gravett专门分析了美国教育发展的性别本质。没有提及的是所服务教师的身份。尽管美国最近的研究得出结论,性别不能预测参与,但过去的文献以及我们自己的生活经验表明,在中心项目中,女性的比例过高。在本文中,我们将探讨这种不平衡的可能解释,以及潜在的后果和解决方案。关键词:ctls多样性性别专业发展女性披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:她在教育发展领域工作了十多年,并在《国际学术发展杂志》、《改善学院》和《教师发展杂志》等期刊上发表了大量文章。Laurie L. McCarty是一位经验丰富的教师、教育开发人员和高等教育管理人员。主要研究方向为双语特殊教育、变革领导、教育发展、反思实践。在她的教师和领导角色中,她一直致力于促进多样性,公平性和包容性,同时支持教师在其专业成长的各个方面。林赛·伯恩哈根(Lindsay Bernhagen)是Torch公司的一名学习策略师,Torch是一家在专业环境中提供指导和指导的公司。在此之前,她是威斯康星大学史蒂文斯点分校(UWSP)包容性教学中心的主任。她在教育发展领域工作了十多年,在教育公平和身份问题上发表、演讲和咨询。Lindsay继续在UWSP的教育可持续性博士课程中教授课程并为研究生提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Academic Development
International Journal for Academic Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
30.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Academic Development ( IJAD) is the journal of the International Consortium for Educational Development. The purpose of IJAD is to enable academic/educational/faculty developers in higher education across the world to exchange ideas about practice and extend the theory of educational development, with the goal of improving the quality of higher education internationally. The editors welcome original contributions on any aspect of academic/educational/faculty development in higher and other post-school education (including staff development, educational development, instructional development and faculty development) and closely related topics. We define ‘academic development’ broadly, and you should read former editor Brenda Leibowitz’s recent paper, ‘Reflections on academic development: what is in a name?’ ( http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rija20/19/4#.VMcX6_7oSGo) to make sure that your understanding of academic development marries with the general sense of the journal. We will NOT accept submissions on K-12 development or teacher education; primary/secondary/high school education in general; or the role that education plays in ‘development’ (economic growth, poverty reduction, environmental sustainability, etc.).
期刊最新文献
Anatomy of a hospitable collaboration: academic hospitality in and for academic development A narrative review of interdisciplinary teaching and learning scholarship: closing the gap between theory and practice Teaching award winners – (in)visible best-practice examples? Findings from Austria and Switzerland Beyond academic development as institutional practice: advancing community-led approaches Adding a scholarly analysis of teaching and learning to SoTL: the development of the hands-on Utrecht Roadmap for SoTL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1