Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Analyzing Public Opinion Sentiments Against Fuel Price Increases

Hanif Wira Saputra, Rahmaddeni Rahmaddeni, Fazri Fazri
{"title":"Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Analyzing Public Opinion Sentiments Against Fuel Price Increases","authors":"Hanif Wira Saputra, Rahmaddeni Rahmaddeni, Fazri Fazri","doi":"10.24114/cess.v8i1.41911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twitter is a social media platform that is quite widely used by the world community, especially people in Indonesia. Twitter is one of the social media that provides information, one of which is the increase in the price of crude oil which was recorded at 105 US dollars per barrel. The increase in fuel prices has a negative impact on society, causing pros and cons. Based on these problems, the authors aim to compare the performance of the artificial neural network and naïve Bayes algorithms to determine the best model for sentiment analysis of fuel price hikes. The data used amounted to 1000 datasets in the form of text documents with labeling using the lexicon and split data 90:10, 80:20, 70:30 and 60:40 as a comparison of precision values. The application of word vectorization utilizes TF-IDF in assigning a weight value to each word. Based on the results of the experiments that have been carried out, it is found that the best algorithm using an artificial neural network is capable of producing an accuracy value of 87% for 1000 data on public opinion sentiment on fuel price hikes. Based on the evaluation results, the model built can categorize public opinion sentiment into positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and neutral sentiment automatically and the polarity of public sentiment tends to be positive towards the issue of the fuel price increase that occurred.","PeriodicalId":53361,"journal":{"name":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v8i1.41911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twitter is a social media platform that is quite widely used by the world community, especially people in Indonesia. Twitter is one of the social media that provides information, one of which is the increase in the price of crude oil which was recorded at 105 US dollars per barrel. The increase in fuel prices has a negative impact on society, causing pros and cons. Based on these problems, the authors aim to compare the performance of the artificial neural network and naïve Bayes algorithms to determine the best model for sentiment analysis of fuel price hikes. The data used amounted to 1000 datasets in the form of text documents with labeling using the lexicon and split data 90:10, 80:20, 70:30 and 60:40 as a comparison of precision values. The application of word vectorization utilizes TF-IDF in assigning a weight value to each word. Based on the results of the experiments that have been carried out, it is found that the best algorithm using an artificial neural network is capable of producing an accuracy value of 87% for 1000 data on public opinion sentiment on fuel price hikes. Based on the evaluation results, the model built can categorize public opinion sentiment into positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and neutral sentiment automatically and the polarity of public sentiment tends to be positive towards the issue of the fuel price increase that occurred.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习算法在分析反对燃料价格上涨的民意情绪中的比较
Twitter是一个社交媒体平台,被国际社会广泛使用,尤其是印度尼西亚人。推特是提供信息的社交媒体之一,其中之一是原油价格上涨,每桶105美元。燃油价格上涨对社会产生负面影响,有利有弊。基于这些问题,作者旨在比较人工神经网络和naïve贝叶斯算法的性能,以确定燃油价格上涨情绪分析的最佳模型。使用的数据总计为1000个数据集,以文本文档的形式使用词典进行标记,并将数据分割为90:10、80:20、70:30和60:40作为精度值的比较。词矢量化的应用利用TF-IDF为每个词分配一个权重值。根据已经进行的实验结果,发现使用人工神经网络的最佳算法能够对1000个关于燃油价格上涨的民意情绪数据产生87%的准确率值。基于评价结果,构建的模型可以自动将舆情分为正面、负面和中性三种情绪,并且舆情极性对发生的燃油价格上涨问题倾向于正面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the Multimedia Development Life Cycle in Making Educational Games About Indonesia Data Mining Algorithm Decision Tree Itterative Dechotomiser 3 (ID3) for Classification of Stroke Implementation of Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) on the Selection of Online English Course Platforms Usability of Brain Tumor Detection Using the DNN (Deep Neural Network) Method Based on Medical Image on DICOM Performance Comparison Analysis of Multi Prime RSA and Multi Power RSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1