Climate Model Code Genealogy and its Relation to Climate Feedbacks and Sensitivity

Peter Kuma, Frida A.-M. Bender, Aiden Robert Jönsson
{"title":"Climate Model Code Genealogy and its Relation to Climate Feedbacks and Sensitivity","authors":"Peter Kuma, Frida A.-M. Bender, Aiden Robert Jönsson","doi":"10.22541/essoar.167422929.96660814/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) and Earth system models (ESMs) are developed by a large number of modeling groups globally. They use a wide range of representations of physical processes, allowing for structural (code) uncertainty to be partially quantified with multi-model ensembles (MMEs). Many models in the MMEs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) have a common development history due to sharing of code and schemes. This makes their projections statistically dependent and introduces biases in MME statistics. Previous research has focused on model output and code dependence, and model code genealogy of CMIP models has not been fully analyzed. We present a full reconstruction of CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 code genealogy of 167 atmospheric models, GCMs, and ESMs (of which 114 participated in CMIP) based on the available literature, with a focus on the atmospheric component and atmospheric physics. We identify 12 main model families. We propose family and code weighting methods designed to reduce the effect of model structural dependence in MMEs. We analyze weighted effective climate sensitivity (ECS), climate feedbacks, forcing, and global mean near-surface air temperature, and how they differ by model family. Models in the same family often have similar climate properties. We show that weighting can partially reconcile differences in ECS and cloud feedbacks between CMIP5 and CMIP6. The results can help in understanding structural dependence between CMIP models, and the proposed code and family weighting methods can be used in MME assessments to ameliorate model structural sampling biases.","PeriodicalId":487619,"journal":{"name":"Authorea (Authorea)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorea (Authorea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167422929.96660814/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Contemporary general circulation models (GCMs) and Earth system models (ESMs) are developed by a large number of modeling groups globally. They use a wide range of representations of physical processes, allowing for structural (code) uncertainty to be partially quantified with multi-model ensembles (MMEs). Many models in the MMEs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) have a common development history due to sharing of code and schemes. This makes their projections statistically dependent and introduces biases in MME statistics. Previous research has focused on model output and code dependence, and model code genealogy of CMIP models has not been fully analyzed. We present a full reconstruction of CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 code genealogy of 167 atmospheric models, GCMs, and ESMs (of which 114 participated in CMIP) based on the available literature, with a focus on the atmospheric component and atmospheric physics. We identify 12 main model families. We propose family and code weighting methods designed to reduce the effect of model structural dependence in MMEs. We analyze weighted effective climate sensitivity (ECS), climate feedbacks, forcing, and global mean near-surface air temperature, and how they differ by model family. Models in the same family often have similar climate properties. We show that weighting can partially reconcile differences in ECS and cloud feedbacks between CMIP5 and CMIP6. The results can help in understanding structural dependence between CMIP models, and the proposed code and family weighting methods can be used in MME assessments to ameliorate model structural sampling biases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候模式代码谱系及其与气候反馈和敏感性的关系
当代大气环流模式(GCMs)和地球系统模式(ESMs)是由全球大量的模式组开发的。它们使用广泛的物理过程表示,允许用多模型集成(MMEs)部分量化结构(代码)不确定性。耦合模型比对项目(CMIP)中的许多模型由于代码和方案的共享而具有共同的开发历史。这使得他们的预测在统计上依赖,并在MME统计中引入偏差。以往的研究主要集中在模型输出和代码依赖上,对CMIP模型的模型代码谱系分析不够全面。本文基于已有文献,对167个大气模式、gcm和esm(其中114个参与了CMIP)的CMIP3、CMIP5和CMIP6代码谱进行了全面重建,重点研究了大气成分和大气物理。我们确定了12个主要的模范家庭。为了减少模型结构依赖性的影响,我们提出了族加权和码加权方法,并分析了加权有效气候敏感性(ECS)、气候反馈、强迫和全球平均近地表气温,以及它们在不同模式族中的差异。同一家族的模型通常具有相似的气候特性。我们发现,加权可以部分地调和CMIP5和CMIP6之间ECS和云反馈的差异。研究结果有助于理解CMIP模型之间的结构依赖关系,所提出的代码和族加权方法可用于MME评估,以改善模型结构抽样偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heart rate variability biofeedback acutely improves attentional control only in highly stressed individuals Relationship between microRNA-9 and breast cancer The impact of land use change on the diversity and emergence of fungal pathogens Severe seasonal shifts in tropical insect ephemerality drive bat foraging effort Using Circulating MicroRNAs as Noninvasive Cancer Biomarkers in Breast Cancer is a Cutting-Edge Application of MicroRNA Profiling Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1