Erfan Hosseini , Negar Hosseini , Mohammad Sarmadivaleh
{"title":"Wettability modification effects on relative permeability end-points: Comparative analysis of surfactant agents for enhanced oil recovery","authors":"Erfan Hosseini , Negar Hosseini , Mohammad Sarmadivaleh","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research examines the impact of wettability alteration on the end points of relative permeability, a crucial property of fluids and porous media that influences the displacement processes of immiscible fluids through such media. The estimation of the mobility ratio for oil recovery relies on these end points, which are influenced by connate water saturation and residual oil saturation. To investigate this relationship, carbonate rock is generally subjected to wettability alteration using surfactant agents, and core flooding is employed to determine the relative permeability before and after the alteration. The wettability of the rock is commonly assessed through contact angle measurements. Two surfactants, TritonX-100 (Tx-100) and Cedar, were tested in reducing the wettability of the porous media for oil. The contact angle measurements revealed that Tx-100 was more effective for this purpose than Cedar. Furthermore, the relative permeability tests indicated that both surfactants decreased residual oil saturation, but Tx-100 also improved system pressure. In contrast, Cedar reduced residual oil saturation but increased system pressure, possibly because of its high viscosity. The results also demonstrate that injecting Tx-100 leads to a 14% increase in ultimate oil recovery compared with water injection, while Cedar injection increased the recovery factor by 5%. This difference may be attributed to the incomplete coverage of the pore wall by Cedar or its weaker chemical structure than Tx-100. Notably, in carbonate cores, neither non-ionic surfactant enhanced oil recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 206-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249523000674/pdfft?md5=928d8d7dd97edd62653466a564fed091&pid=1-s2.0-S2096249523000674-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249523000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research examines the impact of wettability alteration on the end points of relative permeability, a crucial property of fluids and porous media that influences the displacement processes of immiscible fluids through such media. The estimation of the mobility ratio for oil recovery relies on these end points, which are influenced by connate water saturation and residual oil saturation. To investigate this relationship, carbonate rock is generally subjected to wettability alteration using surfactant agents, and core flooding is employed to determine the relative permeability before and after the alteration. The wettability of the rock is commonly assessed through contact angle measurements. Two surfactants, TritonX-100 (Tx-100) and Cedar, were tested in reducing the wettability of the porous media for oil. The contact angle measurements revealed that Tx-100 was more effective for this purpose than Cedar. Furthermore, the relative permeability tests indicated that both surfactants decreased residual oil saturation, but Tx-100 also improved system pressure. In contrast, Cedar reduced residual oil saturation but increased system pressure, possibly because of its high viscosity. The results also demonstrate that injecting Tx-100 leads to a 14% increase in ultimate oil recovery compared with water injection, while Cedar injection increased the recovery factor by 5%. This difference may be attributed to the incomplete coverage of the pore wall by Cedar or its weaker chemical structure than Tx-100. Notably, in carbonate cores, neither non-ionic surfactant enhanced oil recovery.