Wettability modification effects on relative permeability end-points: Comparative analysis of surfactant agents for enhanced oil recovery

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Petroleum Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2023.09.002
Erfan Hosseini , Negar Hosseini , Mohammad Sarmadivaleh
{"title":"Wettability modification effects on relative permeability end-points: Comparative analysis of surfactant agents for enhanced oil recovery","authors":"Erfan Hosseini ,&nbsp;Negar Hosseini ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sarmadivaleh","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research examines the impact of wettability alteration on the end points of relative permeability, a crucial property of fluids and porous media that influences the displacement processes of immiscible fluids through such media. The estimation of the mobility ratio for oil recovery relies on these end points, which are influenced by connate water saturation and residual oil saturation. To investigate this relationship, carbonate rock is generally subjected to wettability alteration using surfactant agents, and core flooding is employed to determine the relative permeability before and after the alteration. The wettability of the rock is commonly assessed through contact angle measurements. Two surfactants, TritonX-100 (Tx-100) and Cedar, were tested in reducing the wettability of the porous media for oil. The contact angle measurements revealed that Tx-100 was more effective for this purpose than Cedar. Furthermore, the relative permeability tests indicated that both surfactants decreased residual oil saturation, but Tx-100 also improved system pressure. In contrast, Cedar reduced residual oil saturation but increased system pressure, possibly because of its high viscosity. The results also demonstrate that injecting Tx-100 leads to a 14% increase in ultimate oil recovery compared with water injection, while Cedar injection increased the recovery factor by 5%. This difference may be attributed to the incomplete coverage of the pore wall by Cedar or its weaker chemical structure than Tx-100. Notably, in carbonate cores, neither non-ionic surfactant enhanced oil recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 206-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249523000674/pdfft?md5=928d8d7dd97edd62653466a564fed091&pid=1-s2.0-S2096249523000674-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249523000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the impact of wettability alteration on the end points of relative permeability, a crucial property of fluids and porous media that influences the displacement processes of immiscible fluids through such media. The estimation of the mobility ratio for oil recovery relies on these end points, which are influenced by connate water saturation and residual oil saturation. To investigate this relationship, carbonate rock is generally subjected to wettability alteration using surfactant agents, and core flooding is employed to determine the relative permeability before and after the alteration. The wettability of the rock is commonly assessed through contact angle measurements. Two surfactants, TritonX-100 (Tx-100) and Cedar, were tested in reducing the wettability of the porous media for oil. The contact angle measurements revealed that Tx-100 was more effective for this purpose than Cedar. Furthermore, the relative permeability tests indicated that both surfactants decreased residual oil saturation, but Tx-100 also improved system pressure. In contrast, Cedar reduced residual oil saturation but increased system pressure, possibly because of its high viscosity. The results also demonstrate that injecting Tx-100 leads to a 14% increase in ultimate oil recovery compared with water injection, while Cedar injection increased the recovery factor by 5%. This difference may be attributed to the incomplete coverage of the pore wall by Cedar or its weaker chemical structure than Tx-100. Notably, in carbonate cores, neither non-ionic surfactant enhanced oil recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
润湿性改性对相对渗透率终点的影响:用于提高石油采收率的表面活性剂的比较分析
这项研究探讨了润湿性改变对相对渗透率终点的影响,相对渗透率是流体和多孔介质的重要属性,影响着不相溶流体在此类介质中的位移过程。采油流动比率的估算依赖于这些端点,而这些端点受到涵水饱和度和剩余油饱和度的影响。为了研究这种关系,通常使用表面活性剂对碳酸盐岩进行润湿性改变,并采用岩心淹没法测定改变前后的相对渗透率。通常通过测量接触角来评估岩石的润湿性。在降低多孔介质对石油的润湿性方面,对 TritonX-100 (Tx-100) 和 Cedar 这两种表面活性剂进行了测试。接触角测量结果表明,Tx-100 在这方面比 Cedar 更有效。此外,相对渗透性测试表明,两种表面活性剂都能降低残油饱和度,但 Tx-100 还能提高系统压力。相比之下,Cedar 虽然降低了残油饱和度,但却提高了系统压力,这可能是因为它的粘度较高。结果还表明,与注水相比,注入 Tx-100 可使最终采油率提高 14%,而注入 Cedar 可使采油系数提高 5%。造成这种差异的原因可能是雪松未完全覆盖孔壁,或者其化学结构弱于 Tx-100。值得注意的是,在碳酸盐岩芯中,两种非离子表面活性剂都不能提高石油采收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Research
Petroleum Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Applicability of deep neural networks for lithofacies classification from conventional well logs: An integrated approach Investigation of a solid particle deposition velocity in drag reducing fluids with salinity Use of graphs to assess well safety in drilling projects and during operations by identification of available barrier elements and consolidation of barrier envelopes Sedimentary microfacies of Member 5 of Xujiahe Formation in the Dongfengchang area, Sichuan Basin Research on physical explosion crater model of high-pressure natural gas pipeline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1