What to make out of loss: exploring the missing textile collection of the National Museum of Cambodia

Magali An Berthon
{"title":"What to make out of loss: exploring the missing textile collection of the National Museum of Cambodia","authors":"Magali An Berthon","doi":"10.17811/rm.13.16.2023.4-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1975, when the Khmer Rouge seized power, the National Museum of Cambodia, under the care of director Ly Vou Ong, was closed with its collections abandoned. Upon the museum’s reopening in 1979 in the aftermath of the dictatorship, only seventy-three silk textiles and a costume collection of about thirty pieces were recovered. Three-quarters of this collection had disappeared due to environmental issues and looting. Most of the pre-1975 staff had died, resulting in a significant loss of knowledge about the museum’s history and objects.
 Due to the lack of comprehensive photographic records for each piece and the unstable inherent qualities of textiles (portable, fragile, easy to hide and copy), it appears nearly impossible to track the looted objects in other museums or private collections. However, catalogues, inventories and sets of datasheets pre-dating 1970 provide substantial evidence of these pieces and their acquisition. This paper argues that in addition to studying and preserving what was salvaged, examining missing artefacts through archival and photographic evidence sheds a more comprehensive light on the value and specificity of the museum’s textile heritage formed through successive curatorial teams from the 1920s to the late 1960s. This research especially explores the importance of paper records as invaluable data to bring new meanings about the history of the collection, as well as physical objects. Through their tactile, textual quality, they act as placeholders in which are inscribed the curator’s choices and the textiles’ material memory. Focusing on the transience of this textile collection opens theoretical and methodological ways to materialise the rich diversity of textile craftsmanship pre-1970 (motifs, styles, techniques) and critically examine further the destructive nature of the Khmer Rouge regime and civil war.","PeriodicalId":40740,"journal":{"name":"Res Mobilis-International Research Journal of Furniture and Decorative Objects","volume":"523 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Mobilis-International Research Journal of Furniture and Decorative Objects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/rm.13.16.2023.4-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1975, when the Khmer Rouge seized power, the National Museum of Cambodia, under the care of director Ly Vou Ong, was closed with its collections abandoned. Upon the museum’s reopening in 1979 in the aftermath of the dictatorship, only seventy-three silk textiles and a costume collection of about thirty pieces were recovered. Three-quarters of this collection had disappeared due to environmental issues and looting. Most of the pre-1975 staff had died, resulting in a significant loss of knowledge about the museum’s history and objects. Due to the lack of comprehensive photographic records for each piece and the unstable inherent qualities of textiles (portable, fragile, easy to hide and copy), it appears nearly impossible to track the looted objects in other museums or private collections. However, catalogues, inventories and sets of datasheets pre-dating 1970 provide substantial evidence of these pieces and their acquisition. This paper argues that in addition to studying and preserving what was salvaged, examining missing artefacts through archival and photographic evidence sheds a more comprehensive light on the value and specificity of the museum’s textile heritage formed through successive curatorial teams from the 1920s to the late 1960s. This research especially explores the importance of paper records as invaluable data to bring new meanings about the history of the collection, as well as physical objects. Through their tactile, textual quality, they act as placeholders in which are inscribed the curator’s choices and the textiles’ material memory. Focusing on the transience of this textile collection opens theoretical and methodological ways to materialise the rich diversity of textile craftsmanship pre-1970 (motifs, styles, techniques) and critically examine further the destructive nature of the Khmer Rouge regime and civil war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何弥补损失:探索柬埔寨国家博物馆遗失的纺织品收藏
1975年,红色高棉夺取政权,柬埔寨国家博物馆(National Museum of Cambodia)在馆长李佑翁(Ly youong)的管理下关闭,藏品被遗弃。在独裁统治结束后的1979年,博物馆重新开放时,只找到了73件丝绸纺织品和大约30件服装收藏。这些藏品中有四分之三因环境问题和抢劫而消失。1975年以前的大多数工作人员已经去世,导致对博物馆历史和物品的了解严重流失。由于缺乏对每件物品的全面摄影记录,以及纺织品固有的不稳定品质(便携、易碎、容易隐藏和复制),似乎几乎不可能在其他博物馆或私人收藏中追踪被掠夺的物品。然而,1970年以前的目录、清单和成套数据表提供了大量证据,证明了这些藏品及其获得情况。本文认为,除了研究和保存抢救出来的文物外,通过档案和照片证据检查丢失的文物,可以更全面地了解博物馆纺织品遗产的价值和特殊性,这些遗产是由20世纪20年代至60年代末的连续策展团队形成的。这项研究特别探讨了纸质记录的重要性,作为宝贵的数据,为馆藏的历史带来了新的意义,以及实物。通过它们的触感和文本性,它们充当了占位符,在其中铭刻着策展人的选择和纺织品的材料记忆。关注这些纺织品收藏的短暂性,打开了理论和方法的途径,以实现1970年以前纺织品工艺的丰富多样性(图案,风格,技术),并进一步批判性地审视红色高棉政权和内战的破坏性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
An attempt to read the change in aesthetics through Deleuze: IAA and SANART aesthetic congresses What to make out of loss: exploring the missing textile collection of the National Museum of Cambodia Quimantú: When a Political Emergency and Rapid Social Transformation Shape an Editorial Project Dona Folô’s clothing: a non-free Creole, who carried jewelry and fine fabrics Editorial Preface: : Contemporary Histories of Design and Transience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1