Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus . ed. by Esther Solomon (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1353/mgs.2023.a908562
Artemis Leontis
{"title":"Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus . ed. by Esther Solomon (review)","authors":"Artemis Leontis","doi":"10.1353/mgs.2023.a908562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus. ed. by Esther Solomon Artemis Leontis (bio) Esther Solomon, editor, Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus. New Anthropologies of Europe series. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2021. Pp. xii + 330. 43 illustrations, 3 tables. Cloth $105.00, Paper $48.00, and E-book $47.00. A standout feature of this book on the social life of antiquities in Greece and, in one case, Cyprus is the range of subjects, issues, approaches, and disciplines covered under the rubric of “contested antiquity.” Artifact displays in Athens, excavated objects from Asine, the landscape of Dodona, and the Stoa of Attalos are all received as “antiquity,” which is understood as the record of past human activities. But what are antiquity’s connections with Greece’s Cold War international politics, Thessaloniki’s memory wars, or a former prison site? Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus, carefully edited by Esther Solomon, brings together ten articles by anthropologists, archaeologists, museologists, geographers, and heritage practitioners whose work represents the current state of the interdisciplinary critical discussion about archaeological heritage in Greece. It is an exciting, demanding book and should be read by anyone in any discipline interested in the entanglements of ancient materials with people, power, and sociopolitical conflicts in the present era. About these entanglements, Solomon makes a sweeping claim: “Since the nineteenth century, almost all conflicts characterizing social reality in Greece and Cyprus have been linked to the use, and more generally the perception, of the two countries’ ancient material culture” (35). Solomon’s introduction (1–49) sets the stage while demonstrating impressive control of an extensive bibliography. She opens with a wide frame, reminding readers of the simultaneous global and local positions of Greek antiquity that have made archaeology “one of the most symbolically loaded disciplines” in the modern Greek nation-state (3). Western powers, foreign antiquarians and, later, archaeologists, the Greek state, and heritage institutions have all been involved in mobilizing archaeology’s symbolic capital. In different ways, each of these has made archaeology “an important agent that united modernity [End Page 293] with nation-building, colonialism, and territorial establishments” (4). Later, in the last two decades of the twentieth century, scholarship informed by post- processual, poststructuralist, and postcolonial approaches turned attention to the ideological uses of archaeology. Critiques came from archaeology (Shanks and Tilley 1992; Trigger 1989; Hamilakis and Yalouri 1996), history and meta-history (Lowenthal 1988; Brown and Hamilakis 2003), anthropology (Herzfeld 1982, 1988, 2002), and literary criticism (Tziovas 1989; Leontis 1995; Gourgouris 1996). Especially significant was the ethnographic turn in the study of ancient heritage (Herzfeld 1991, 1997; Yalouri 2001; Hamilakis 2007; Hamilakis and Anagnostopoulos 2009; Stroulia and Buck Sutton 2010), which called attention to the dynamic role of objects in human society and to the question of how present day communities are involved in the politics of the past. Important work from a visual-cultural perspective followed in the 2000s (Damaskos and Plantzos 2008). Solomon has herself been part of the Archaeological Dialogues, a multidisciplinary collectivity formed in Athens to undertake a “critical and reflective dialogue about antiquities and archaeology in contemporary society” (Archaeological Dialogues 2015). A panel that she chaired on “Archaeology and Memory Wars”—on the role archaeology may play not only in creating official public memory but also in exposing “dissonant,” “difficult,” “dark,” and “variously contested” heritage (2)—prepared the ground for the present volume. The articles that follow are well-researched case studies built on knowledge of Greek archaeology and its broader ramifications, each with a carefully honed argument on some contentious issue that relates to contemporary social or political reality. Each chapter could stand alone in an academic journal, but helpful cross-references reveal many subtle interconnections among them. The organization of the book into three parts draws attention to three axes of conflict, each characterized by power differentials among the agents involved. Part I, “Between Nationalism, Colonialism, and Crypto-Colonialism: Historical Perspectives and Current Implications,” contains four articles that work through the tensions between Greek and foreign interests with respect to ancient Greece. In chapter 1, “Hellas Mon Amour...","PeriodicalId":43810,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2023.a908562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus. ed. by Esther Solomon Artemis Leontis (bio) Esther Solomon, editor, Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus. New Anthropologies of Europe series. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2021. Pp. xii + 330. 43 illustrations, 3 tables. Cloth $105.00, Paper $48.00, and E-book $47.00. A standout feature of this book on the social life of antiquities in Greece and, in one case, Cyprus is the range of subjects, issues, approaches, and disciplines covered under the rubric of “contested antiquity.” Artifact displays in Athens, excavated objects from Asine, the landscape of Dodona, and the Stoa of Attalos are all received as “antiquity,” which is understood as the record of past human activities. But what are antiquity’s connections with Greece’s Cold War international politics, Thessaloniki’s memory wars, or a former prison site? Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus, carefully edited by Esther Solomon, brings together ten articles by anthropologists, archaeologists, museologists, geographers, and heritage practitioners whose work represents the current state of the interdisciplinary critical discussion about archaeological heritage in Greece. It is an exciting, demanding book and should be read by anyone in any discipline interested in the entanglements of ancient materials with people, power, and sociopolitical conflicts in the present era. About these entanglements, Solomon makes a sweeping claim: “Since the nineteenth century, almost all conflicts characterizing social reality in Greece and Cyprus have been linked to the use, and more generally the perception, of the two countries’ ancient material culture” (35). Solomon’s introduction (1–49) sets the stage while demonstrating impressive control of an extensive bibliography. She opens with a wide frame, reminding readers of the simultaneous global and local positions of Greek antiquity that have made archaeology “one of the most symbolically loaded disciplines” in the modern Greek nation-state (3). Western powers, foreign antiquarians and, later, archaeologists, the Greek state, and heritage institutions have all been involved in mobilizing archaeology’s symbolic capital. In different ways, each of these has made archaeology “an important agent that united modernity [End Page 293] with nation-building, colonialism, and territorial establishments” (4). Later, in the last two decades of the twentieth century, scholarship informed by post- processual, poststructuralist, and postcolonial approaches turned attention to the ideological uses of archaeology. Critiques came from archaeology (Shanks and Tilley 1992; Trigger 1989; Hamilakis and Yalouri 1996), history and meta-history (Lowenthal 1988; Brown and Hamilakis 2003), anthropology (Herzfeld 1982, 1988, 2002), and literary criticism (Tziovas 1989; Leontis 1995; Gourgouris 1996). Especially significant was the ethnographic turn in the study of ancient heritage (Herzfeld 1991, 1997; Yalouri 2001; Hamilakis 2007; Hamilakis and Anagnostopoulos 2009; Stroulia and Buck Sutton 2010), which called attention to the dynamic role of objects in human society and to the question of how present day communities are involved in the politics of the past. Important work from a visual-cultural perspective followed in the 2000s (Damaskos and Plantzos 2008). Solomon has herself been part of the Archaeological Dialogues, a multidisciplinary collectivity formed in Athens to undertake a “critical and reflective dialogue about antiquities and archaeology in contemporary society” (Archaeological Dialogues 2015). A panel that she chaired on “Archaeology and Memory Wars”—on the role archaeology may play not only in creating official public memory but also in exposing “dissonant,” “difficult,” “dark,” and “variously contested” heritage (2)—prepared the ground for the present volume. The articles that follow are well-researched case studies built on knowledge of Greek archaeology and its broader ramifications, each with a carefully honed argument on some contentious issue that relates to contemporary social or political reality. Each chapter could stand alone in an academic journal, but helpful cross-references reveal many subtle interconnections among them. The organization of the book into three parts draws attention to three axes of conflict, each characterized by power differentials among the agents involved. Part I, “Between Nationalism, Colonialism, and Crypto-Colonialism: Historical Perspectives and Current Implications,” contains four articles that work through the tensions between Greek and foreign interests with respect to ancient Greece. In chapter 1, “Hellas Mon Amour...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有争议的古代:现代希腊和塞浦路斯的考古遗产和社会冲突。埃丝特·所罗门主编(评论)
评审:有争议的古代:现代希腊和塞浦路斯的考古遗产和社会冲突。埃斯特·所罗门主编,《有争议的古代:现代希腊和塞浦路斯的考古遗产和社会冲突》。《新欧洲人类学》系列。布卢明顿:印第安纳大学出版社,2021年。Pp. xii + 330。43张插图,3张表格。布$105.00,纸$48.00,电子书$47.00。这本书的一个突出的特点是在希腊的社会生活的文物,在一个情况下,塞浦路斯是主题的范围,问题,方法,和学科涵盖了“有争议的古代”的标题。在雅典展出的人工制品、从亚洲出土的文物、多多纳的景观、阿塔洛斯的石碑都被认为是“古代”,被理解为过去人类活动的记录。但是,古物与希腊冷战时期的国际政治、塞萨洛尼基的记忆之战或一座前监狱遗址有什么联系呢?有争议的古代:现代希腊和塞浦路斯的考古遗产和社会冲突,由Esther Solomon精心编辑,汇集了人类学家,考古学家,博物馆学家,地理学家和遗产实践者的十篇文章,他们的工作代表了关于希腊考古遗产的跨学科批判性讨论的现状。这是一本令人兴奋的、要求很高的书,任何对古代材料与当今时代的人、权力和社会政治冲突的纠葛感兴趣的人都应该读这本书。关于这些纠缠,所罗门提出了一个全面的主张:“自19世纪以来,希腊和塞浦路斯社会现实中几乎所有的冲突都与两国古代物质文化的使用有关,更广泛地说,与两国古代物质文化的认知有关”(35)。所罗门的引言(1-49)奠定了基础,同时展示了对广泛参考书目的令人印象深刻的控制。她以一个广阔的框架开始,提醒读者希腊古代同时具有全球和地方的地位,这使得考古学成为现代希腊民族国家中“最具象征意义的学科之一”(3)。西方列强、外国古物学家,以及后来的考古学家、希腊国家和遗产机构都参与了动员考古学的象征资本。以不同的方式,这些都使考古学成为“将现代性与国家建设、殖民主义和领土建立结合起来的重要媒介”(4)。后来,在20世纪的最后20年,受后过程主义、后结构主义和后殖民主义方法影响的学术将注意力转向考古学的意识形态用途。批评来自考古学(Shanks and Tilley 1992;触发1989;Hamilakis and Yalouri 1996),历史和元历史(Lowenthal 1988;Brown and Hamilakis 2003)、人类学(Herzfeld 1982、1988、2002)和文学批评(Tziovas 1989;Leontis 1995;Gourgouris 1996)。尤其重要的是古代遗产研究中的民族志转向(Herzfeld 1991,1997;Yalouri 2001;Hamilakis 2007;Hamilakis and Anagnostopoulos 2009;Stroulia和Buck Sutton, 2010),这引起了人们对物体在人类社会中的动态作用的关注,以及当今社区如何参与过去政治的问题。从视觉文化的角度来看,重要的工作紧随其后(Damaskos和Plantzos 2008)。所罗门本人是考古对话的一员,这是一个在雅典成立的多学科集体,旨在开展“当代社会中关于文物和考古学的批判性和反思性对话”(考古对话2015)。她主持的“考古学与记忆之战”小组讨论——考古学不仅在创造官方公共记忆方面可能发挥的作用,而且在揭露“不和谐的”、“困难的”、“黑暗的”和“各种有争议的”遗产方面可能发挥的作用(2)——为本书奠定了基础。接下来的文章都是经过充分研究的案例研究,它们建立在对希腊考古学及其更广泛的影响的了解之上,每篇文章都对一些与当代社会或政治现实有关的有争议的问题进行了精心的论证。在学术期刊上,每一章都可以单独存在,但有用的交叉参考揭示了它们之间许多微妙的相互联系。这本书的组织分为三个部分,吸引了人们对三个冲突轴的关注,每个轴的特征是参与其中的代理人之间的权力差异。第一部分,“在民族主义、殖民主义和神秘殖民主义之间:历史视角和当前影响”,包含四篇文章,通过古希腊与外国利益之间的紧张关系进行研究。在第一章“你好,我的爱人……”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES
JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Praised as "a magnificent scholarly journal" by Choice magazine, the Journal of Modern Greek Studies is the only scholarly periodical to focus exclusively on modern Greece. The Journal publishes critical analyses of Greek social, cultural, and political affairs, covering the period from the late Byzantine Empire to the present. Contributors include internationally recognized scholars in the fields of history, literature, anthropology, political science, Byzantine studies, and modern Greece.
期刊最新文献
Resituating Europe's Greek Origins from the Athenian Polis to the Cypriot Sugar Plantation The Cypriot collection of Petrarchist and other Renaissance poems ed. by Paschalis M. Kitromilides, and: Studies on the Cypriot Collection of Renaissance poems ed. by Marina Rodosthenous-Balafa (review) The Influence of "Greek Lifestyle" Perceptions on Polish Migration and Settlement on Zakynthos Contributor Bouboulina and the Greek Revolution: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Heroine of 1821 ed. by April Kalogeropoulos Householder (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1