{"title":"Prediction of compressive strength of brick columns confined with FRP, FRCM, and SRG system using GEP and ANN methods","authors":"Habib Allah Poornamazian, Mohsen Izadinia","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assesses the strength capacity of brick columns under various confinement materials, including fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM), and steel-reinforced grout (SRG) using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) models. To achieve this, a comprehensive database of masonry column test results from existing scientific literature is compiled. The models' performance is evaluated using statistical errors like the coefficient of linear correlation (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Additionally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to assess the significance of individual parameters in the models. The findings reveal that ANN predictions closely match empirical data, demonstrating a strong correlation coefficient of 0.95. The accuracy of the ANN approach is reasonably high, with only 26% of the predicted values deviating by more than 20% from the actual data. Based on the statistical analyses, the correlation coefficient between the actual and estimated data was 0.88, for GEP method. Also, the GEP model yields outcomes, with roughly 43% of the predicted values differing by 20–50% from the actual data. In a comparison of the two models, the ANN model outperforms the GEP model, displaying a 40% reduction in error when estimating the compressive strength of masonry columns. The data estimated by the GEP were sparser than those estimated by the ANN. Nevertheless, the GEP model still maintains an acceptable correlation coefficient and error rate, making it a viable choice for precise predictions. It offers a user-friendly formula and meets the needs of both customers and builders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 42-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002547/pdfft?md5=a4b5450380616e7152d39f8efdbdf213&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723002547-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assesses the strength capacity of brick columns under various confinement materials, including fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM), and steel-reinforced grout (SRG) using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) models. To achieve this, a comprehensive database of masonry column test results from existing scientific literature is compiled. The models' performance is evaluated using statistical errors like the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Additionally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to assess the significance of individual parameters in the models. The findings reveal that ANN predictions closely match empirical data, demonstrating a strong correlation coefficient of 0.95. The accuracy of the ANN approach is reasonably high, with only 26% of the predicted values deviating by more than 20% from the actual data. Based on the statistical analyses, the correlation coefficient between the actual and estimated data was 0.88, for GEP method. Also, the GEP model yields outcomes, with roughly 43% of the predicted values differing by 20–50% from the actual data. In a comparison of the two models, the ANN model outperforms the GEP model, displaying a 40% reduction in error when estimating the compressive strength of masonry columns. The data estimated by the GEP were sparser than those estimated by the ANN. Nevertheless, the GEP model still maintains an acceptable correlation coefficient and error rate, making it a viable choice for precise predictions. It offers a user-friendly formula and meets the needs of both customers and builders.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).