Prediction of compressive strength of brick columns confined with FRP, FRCM, and SRG system using GEP and ANN methods

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.029
Habib Allah Poornamazian, Mohsen Izadinia
{"title":"Prediction of compressive strength of brick columns confined with FRP, FRCM, and SRG system using GEP and ANN methods","authors":"Habib Allah Poornamazian,&nbsp;Mohsen Izadinia","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assesses the strength capacity of brick columns under various confinement materials, including fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM), and steel-reinforced grout (SRG) using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) models. To achieve this, a comprehensive database of masonry column test results from existing scientific literature is compiled. The models' performance is evaluated using statistical errors like the coefficient of linear correlation (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Additionally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to assess the significance of individual parameters in the models. The findings reveal that ANN predictions closely match empirical data, demonstrating a strong correlation coefficient of 0.95. The accuracy of the ANN approach is reasonably high, with only 26% of the predicted values deviating by more than 20% from the actual data. Based on the statistical analyses, the correlation coefficient between the actual and estimated data was 0.88, for GEP method. Also, the GEP model yields outcomes, with roughly 43% of the predicted values differing by 20–50% from the actual data. In a comparison of the two models, the ANN model outperforms the GEP model, displaying a 40% reduction in error when estimating the compressive strength of masonry columns. The data estimated by the GEP were sparser than those estimated by the ANN. Nevertheless, the GEP model still maintains an acceptable correlation coefficient and error rate, making it a viable choice for precise predictions. It offers a user-friendly formula and meets the needs of both customers and builders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 42-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002547/pdfft?md5=a4b5450380616e7152d39f8efdbdf213&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723002547-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723002547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the strength capacity of brick columns under various confinement materials, including fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM), and steel-reinforced grout (SRG) using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) models. To achieve this, a comprehensive database of masonry column test results from existing scientific literature is compiled. The models' performance is evaluated using statistical errors like the coefficient of linear correlation (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Additionally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to assess the significance of individual parameters in the models. The findings reveal that ANN predictions closely match empirical data, demonstrating a strong correlation coefficient of 0.95. The accuracy of the ANN approach is reasonably high, with only 26% of the predicted values deviating by more than 20% from the actual data. Based on the statistical analyses, the correlation coefficient between the actual and estimated data was 0.88, for GEP method. Also, the GEP model yields outcomes, with roughly 43% of the predicted values differing by 20–50% from the actual data. In a comparison of the two models, the ANN model outperforms the GEP model, displaying a 40% reduction in error when estimating the compressive strength of masonry columns. The data estimated by the GEP were sparser than those estimated by the ANN. Nevertheless, the GEP model still maintains an acceptable correlation coefficient and error rate, making it a viable choice for precise predictions. It offers a user-friendly formula and meets the needs of both customers and builders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 GEP 和 ANN 方法预测用 FRP、FRCM 和 SRG 系统约束的砖柱的抗压强度
本研究采用基因表达编程(GEP)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型,评估了砖柱在各种约束材料(包括纤维增强聚合物(FRP)、纤维增强水泥基质(FRCM)和钢筋灌浆料(SRG))作用下的强度能力。为此,我们从现有的科学文献中汇编了一个全面的砌体柱测试结果数据库。使用线性相关系数 (R2)、平均绝对误差 (MAE)、均方误差 (MSE) 和均方根误差 (RMSE) 等统计误差来评估模型的性能。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以评估模型中各个参数的重要性。研究结果表明,ANN 预测结果与经验数据非常吻合,相关系数高达 0.95。ANN 方法的准确度相当高,只有 26% 的预测值与实际数据的偏差超过 20%。根据统计分析,GEP 方法的实际数据与估计数据之间的相关系数为 0.88。此外,GEP 模型得出的结果中,大约 43% 的预测值与实际数据相差 20%-50%。在两种模型的比较中,ANN 模型优于 GEP 模型,在估算砌体柱抗压强度时误差减少了 40%。GEP 估算的数据比 ANN 估算的数据更为稀疏。尽管如此,GEP 模型仍然保持了可接受的相关系数和误差率,使其成为精确预测的可行选择。它提供了一个用户友好型公式,满足了客户和建筑商的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
期刊最新文献
Investigation of optimal feature for milling chatter identification using supervised machine learning techniques Prediction of tensile strength of biochar filled polylactic acid composites via box-behnken design Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube (SWCNT) thin films via automatic spray coating and nitric acid vapor treatment Experimental studies on performance and emission measures of a 4-stroke compression ignition engine using palm bio-diesel blended with N-butanol Performance evaluation of turbulent circular heat exchanger with a novel flow deflector-type baffle plate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1