Apparent digestibility coefficients of plant feed ingredients for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.47853/fas.2023.e7
Md Mostafizur Rahman, Buddhi E. Gunathilaka, Sang-Guan You, Kang-Woong Kim, Sang-Min Lee
{"title":"Apparent digestibility coefficients of plant feed ingredients for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)","authors":"Md Mostafizur Rahman, Buddhi E. Gunathilaka, Sang-Guan You, Kang-Woong Kim, Sang-Min Lee","doi":"10.47853/fas.2023.e7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was designed to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of soybean meal, soy protein concentrate (SPC), soy protein isolate (SPI), rapeseed meal (RSM), pea protein concentrate (PPC), wheat gluten meal (WGM) and wheat flour (WF) for olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. A reference diet (RF) was formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of olive flounder with 1% chromic oxide (Cr2O3) as an inert indicator. Test diets were prepared to contain 70% RF and 30% of the test ingredient. Olive flounder, averaging 150 ± 8.0 g, was cultured in 400-L fiberglass tanks at a density of 25 fish per tank. Fecal collection columns were attached to each tank. Fecal samples were obtained from triplicate groups of fish for 4 weeks. Dry matter digestibility of SPC (75%) and WGM (76%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients. Protein digestibility of SPC (85%), PPC (88%) and WGM (89%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients, and protein digestibility of RSM (77%) and WF (76%) was lower than the other ingredients tested. Lipid digestibility of SPC (72%) and SPI (69%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients. Energy digestibility of SPC (85%) and WGM (82%) were significantly higher than that of others tested ingredients. The availability of amino acids in WGM was generally higher than in other plant-feed ingredients. Therefore, SPC and WGM were seems to be efficient as potential protein sources for olive flounder compared to other tested ingredients. Overall, findings of the current study may assist in more efficient and economical formulation of diets using plant feed ingredients for olive flounder.","PeriodicalId":12249,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47853/fas.2023.e7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the apparent digestibility coefficients of soybean meal, soy protein concentrate (SPC), soy protein isolate (SPI), rapeseed meal (RSM), pea protein concentrate (PPC), wheat gluten meal (WGM) and wheat flour (WF) for olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. A reference diet (RF) was formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of olive flounder with 1% chromic oxide (Cr2O3) as an inert indicator. Test diets were prepared to contain 70% RF and 30% of the test ingredient. Olive flounder, averaging 150 ± 8.0 g, was cultured in 400-L fiberglass tanks at a density of 25 fish per tank. Fecal collection columns were attached to each tank. Fecal samples were obtained from triplicate groups of fish for 4 weeks. Dry matter digestibility of SPC (75%) and WGM (76%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients. Protein digestibility of SPC (85%), PPC (88%) and WGM (89%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients, and protein digestibility of RSM (77%) and WF (76%) was lower than the other ingredients tested. Lipid digestibility of SPC (72%) and SPI (69%) were significantly higher than the other test ingredients. Energy digestibility of SPC (85%) and WGM (82%) were significantly higher than that of others tested ingredients. The availability of amino acids in WGM was generally higher than in other plant-feed ingredients. Therefore, SPC and WGM were seems to be efficient as potential protein sources for olive flounder compared to other tested ingredients. Overall, findings of the current study may assist in more efficient and economical formulation of diets using plant feed ingredients for olive flounder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
橄榄比目鱼植物饲料原料的表观消化率系数
本试验旨在测定橄榄比目鱼对豆粕、大豆浓缩蛋白(SPC)、大豆分离蛋白(SPI)、菜籽粕(RSM)、豌豆浓缩蛋白(PPC)、小麦蛋白粉(WGM)和小麦粉(WF)的表观消化系数。以1%氧化铬(Cr2O3)为惰性指示剂,配制出满足橄榄比目鱼营养需求的参考饲料(RF)。试验饲粮的RF含量为70%,试验原料含量为30%。橄榄比目鱼平均150±8.0 g,在400 l玻璃纤维罐中养殖,密度为25尾/箱。粪便收集柱附在每个水箱上。取三组鱼的粪便样本,为期4周。SPC(75%)和WGM(76%)的干物质消化率显著高于其他试验成分。SPC(85%)、PPC(88%)和WGM(89%)的蛋白质消化率显著高于其他试验原料,RSM(77%)和WF(76%)的蛋白质消化率显著低于其他试验原料。SPC(72%)和SPI(69%)的脂质消化率显著高于其他试验原料。SPC(85%)和WGM(82%)的能量消化率显著高于其他被试成分。WGM中氨基酸的利用率普遍高于其他植物性饲料成分。因此,与其他测试成分相比,SPC和WGM似乎是橄榄比目鱼的潜在蛋白质来源。总的来说,本研究的发现可能有助于使用植物饲料成分更有效和经济地配制橄榄比目鱼的饲料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
DNA barcoding of fish diversity from Batanghari River, Jambi, Indonesia Impact of anthropogenic activities on the accumulation of heavy metals in water, sediments and some commercially important fish of the Padma River, Bangladesh Long arm octopus (Octopus minor) extract prevents eye injury caused by particulate matter exposure in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos Extracts of abalone intestine regulates fat metabolism in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and high fat diet-induced zebrafish larvae Biological aspects of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Geray Reservoir (Ethiopia) for effective sustainable fisheries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1