The Date of Codex Sinaiticus: Revisiting Milne and Skeat’s Numerical Argument

Zachary J Cole
{"title":"The Date of Codex Sinaiticus: Revisiting Milne and Skeat’s Numerical Argument","authors":"Zachary J Cole","doi":"10.1093/jts/flad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents new evidence relevant to H. J. M. Milne and T. C. Skeat’s argument for the date of Codex Sinaiticus, which they described as ‘not likely to be much later than about A.D. 360’. Such precision derived in part from their observation of an ‘old system’ of scribal figures for numerals in the thousands found in the codex. In addition to presenting many new relevant comparanda, this study also provides a critical examination of the argument itself. It is argued that although many of Milne and Skeat’s observations were correct, their appeal to numerals to establish a terminus ante quem for Codex Sinaiticus is invalid.","PeriodicalId":213560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Theological Studies","volume":"399 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flad012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article presents new evidence relevant to H. J. M. Milne and T. C. Skeat’s argument for the date of Codex Sinaiticus, which they described as ‘not likely to be much later than about A.D. 360’. Such precision derived in part from their observation of an ‘old system’ of scribal figures for numerals in the thousands found in the codex. In addition to presenting many new relevant comparanda, this study also provides a critical examination of the argument itself. It is argued that although many of Milne and Skeat’s observations were correct, their appeal to numerals to establish a terminus ante quem for Codex Sinaiticus is invalid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西奈抄本的日期:重新审视米尔恩和斯基特的数值论证
本文提出了与h.j.m. Milne和t.c. Skeat关于西奈抄本日期的论点相关的新证据,他们将其描述为“不太可能晚于大约公元360年”。这种精确度部分源于他们对抄本中数千个数字的“旧系统”的观察。除了提出许多新的相关比较外,本研究还提供了对论点本身的批判性检查。有人认为,尽管米尔恩和斯基特的许多观察是正确的,但他们呼吁用数字来建立《西奈抄本》的终局点是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Prosōpon of Jesus’ Soul in Origen’s Homilies on Psalm 15 (16) The Independent Works of Luke: Further Evidence on the Early Christian Reception of Luke and Acts Theology of the Book of Proverbs. By Katharine J. Dell Gerhard von Rad and the Study of Wisdom Literature. Edited by Timothy J. Sandoval and Bernd U. Schipper The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism: A New Theory of People, Exile, and Israelite Identity. By Jason A. Staples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1