Crowdfunding platforms in Russia: Methodological tools for agents’ investment decision-making

Sergey V. Khmura, Vilena A. Yakimova
{"title":"Crowdfunding platforms in Russia: Methodological tools for agents’ investment decision-making","authors":"Sergey V. Khmura, Vilena A. Yakimova","doi":"10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern conditions brought forth digital investment platforms, which have offered new possibilities of raising capital by entrepreneurs. The paper aims to rank these platforms to meet the information and analytical needs of agents in investment decision-making. Methodologically, the paper relies on the ecosystem approach, as well as propositions of digital, collaborative and platform economics. The paper applies the methods of grade rating, coefficient and correlation analysis. The evidence comes from public reports on investment activities of 68 crowdfunding platform operators and other information available on their websites. To rank the platforms, the study considers the factors related to investment activity (competitiveness, market activity, scaling up, etc.) and risks (financial insolvency, credit and litigation risks, etc.) and then designs a method for a rating-based assessment of investment activity and risks. The paper provides a multivariate assessment of investment activity and risks including systemic ones and specific for certain types of crowdfunding. The study presents the ranking of 68 crowdfunding platforms, identifies types of platforms according to the criteria “investment activity – risks”, as well as the criteria of security of investment (Co-Fi, Peers.money, Potok.Digital, InveStore, InvestGO) and association with a high risk. The method can be useful for investors and borrowers to justify their financial decisions; for the Bank of Russia to perform control and supervision procedures; and for professional community to outline directions for the development and promotion of the crowdfunding in Russia.","PeriodicalId":33954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Economy","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern conditions brought forth digital investment platforms, which have offered new possibilities of raising capital by entrepreneurs. The paper aims to rank these platforms to meet the information and analytical needs of agents in investment decision-making. Methodologically, the paper relies on the ecosystem approach, as well as propositions of digital, collaborative and platform economics. The paper applies the methods of grade rating, coefficient and correlation analysis. The evidence comes from public reports on investment activities of 68 crowdfunding platform operators and other information available on their websites. To rank the platforms, the study considers the factors related to investment activity (competitiveness, market activity, scaling up, etc.) and risks (financial insolvency, credit and litigation risks, etc.) and then designs a method for a rating-based assessment of investment activity and risks. The paper provides a multivariate assessment of investment activity and risks including systemic ones and specific for certain types of crowdfunding. The study presents the ranking of 68 crowdfunding platforms, identifies types of platforms according to the criteria “investment activity – risks”, as well as the criteria of security of investment (Co-Fi, Peers.money, Potok.Digital, InveStore, InvestGO) and association with a high risk. The method can be useful for investors and borrowers to justify their financial decisions; for the Bank of Russia to perform control and supervision procedures; and for professional community to outline directions for the development and promotion of the crowdfunding in Russia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯众筹平台:代理人投资决策的方法论工具
现代条件催生了数字投资平台,为企业家融资提供了新的可能。本文旨在对这些平台进行排序,以满足代理人在投资决策中的信息和分析需求。在方法上,本文依赖于生态系统方法,以及数字、协作和平台经济学的主张。本文运用了等级分析法、系数分析法和相关分析法。这一证据来自68家众筹平台运营商的投资活动公开报告及其网站上的其他信息。为了对平台进行排名,本研究考虑了与投资活动(竞争力、市场活动、规模扩大等)和风险(财务破产、信用和诉讼风险等)相关的因素,然后设计了一种基于评级的投资活动和风险评估方法。本文对投资活动和风险进行了多元评估,包括系统性风险和特定类型众筹的风险。本研究给出了68家众筹平台的排名,根据“投资活动-风险”标准以及投资安全性标准(Co-Fi, Peers)对平台进行了分类。钱,Potok。Digital, InveStore, InvestGO)和高风险关联。这种方法对投资者和借款人证明他们的财务决策是有用的;俄罗斯银行执行控制和监督程序;为专业团体勾勒出俄罗斯众筹的发展和推广方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The multilevel management system for Russian economy amid sanctions The effect of transport parameters on regional economic development: The case of the Ural Federal District Nation brand: A systems approach to the creation and management Evolution of Ural cities at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries Food retail in rural areas: Choosing the optimal format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1