Fair and efficient vaccine allocation: A generalized Gini index approach

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Production and Operations Management Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1111/poms.14080
Walter J. Gutjahr
{"title":"Fair and efficient vaccine allocation: A generalized Gini index approach","authors":"Walter J. Gutjahr","doi":"10.1111/poms.14080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper proposes an optimization model for the allocation of vaccines to a heterogeneous population composed of several subpopulations with different sizes and epidemiological disease transmission parameters. As the objective, an aggregated function combining a standard utilitarian efficiency criterion with a Gini index–related penalty term is considered. Contrary to previous work, we adopt an outcome equity view: The inequity measure is not based on vaccination fractions or other input factors, but on the fractions of individuals escaping infection, as predicted by an susceptible‐infectious‐removed (SIR) model. An adjusted pro rata (APR) policy of vaccine allocation minimizing inequity in this outcome view is introduced, and a numerical procedure for its determination is presented. The concepts are developed both for the case of segregated subpopulations and for that of interactions between the subpopulations. Interestingly, in a large number of instances, the optimal solution under the aggregated objective function turns out to be identical to APR. Whether APR is locally or even globally optimal in a concrete case depends on the relation of an inequity aversion parameter to certain threshold values. While the local optimality threshold can be determined by linear programming, the determination of the global optimality threshold, as the vaccine allocation problem itself, is a problem of nonconvex optimization. We suggest an exact optimization approach for smaller instances, and propose algorithms building on particle swarm optimization for threshold determination and allocation optimization at larger instances. Extensions to alternative outcome measures such as the number of fatalities are presented as well. In addition to the investigation of randomly generated instances, two test cases from the literature are revisited in the context of the present work. Moreover, a new case study based on data from the COVID‐19 outbreak in Austria in 2020 is introduced and analyzed.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper proposes an optimization model for the allocation of vaccines to a heterogeneous population composed of several subpopulations with different sizes and epidemiological disease transmission parameters. As the objective, an aggregated function combining a standard utilitarian efficiency criterion with a Gini index–related penalty term is considered. Contrary to previous work, we adopt an outcome equity view: The inequity measure is not based on vaccination fractions or other input factors, but on the fractions of individuals escaping infection, as predicted by an susceptible‐infectious‐removed (SIR) model. An adjusted pro rata (APR) policy of vaccine allocation minimizing inequity in this outcome view is introduced, and a numerical procedure for its determination is presented. The concepts are developed both for the case of segregated subpopulations and for that of interactions between the subpopulations. Interestingly, in a large number of instances, the optimal solution under the aggregated objective function turns out to be identical to APR. Whether APR is locally or even globally optimal in a concrete case depends on the relation of an inequity aversion parameter to certain threshold values. While the local optimality threshold can be determined by linear programming, the determination of the global optimality threshold, as the vaccine allocation problem itself, is a problem of nonconvex optimization. We suggest an exact optimization approach for smaller instances, and propose algorithms building on particle swarm optimization for threshold determination and allocation optimization at larger instances. Extensions to alternative outcome measures such as the number of fatalities are presented as well. In addition to the investigation of randomly generated instances, two test cases from the literature are revisited in the context of the present work. Moreover, a new case study based on data from the COVID‐19 outbreak in Austria in 2020 is introduced and analyzed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平和有效的疫苗分配:一个广义的基尼指数方法
摘要本文提出了一个由不同规模和流行病学疾病传播参数的不同亚群组成的异质群体的疫苗配置优化模型。作为目标,考虑将标准功利效率标准与基尼指数相关的惩罚项相结合的聚合函数。与之前的工作相反,我们采用了结果公平观点:不公平的衡量不是基于疫苗接种分数或其他输入因素,而是基于逃脱感染的个体的分数,正如易感-感染-去除(SIR)模型所预测的那样。在此结果视图中,引入了一种使疫苗分配不公平最小化的调整比例(APR)政策,并给出了其确定的数值程序。这些概念既适用于分离的亚种群,也适用于亚种群之间的相互作用。有趣的是,在很多情况下,聚合目标函数下的最优解与APR相同。具体情况下,APR是局部最优还是全局最优取决于不平等厌恶参数与某些阈值的关系。局部最优阈值可以通过线性规划确定,而全局最优阈值的确定,作为疫苗分配问题本身,是一个非凸优化问题。我们提出了一种针对较小实例的精确优化方法,并提出了基于粒子群优化的算法用于较大实例的阈值确定和分配优化。还提出了对诸如死亡人数等其他结果衡量标准的扩展。除了随机生成的实例的调查,两个测试用例从文献中被重新审视在当前工作的背景下。此外,还介绍并分析了基于2020年奥地利COVID - 19疫情数据的新案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
期刊最新文献
Complementarity analysis of a multi‐item inventory model with leading product pricing The impact of COVID‐19 on supply chain credit risk Physician Practice Migration and Changes in Practice Style: An Empirical Analysis of Inappropriate Diagnostic Imaging in Primary Care Extraction of visual information to predict crowdfunding success Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1