Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Production and Operations Management Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1111/poms.14082
Xiaole Chen, Vernon N. Hsu, Guoming Lai, Yang Li
{"title":"Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises","authors":"Xiaole Chen, Vernon N. Hsu, Guoming Lai, Yang Li","doi":"10.1111/poms.14082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Companies have increasingly used supply chain financing instead of bank financing when engaging with financially constrained suppliers. We investigate the effectiveness of different financing mechanisms at supporting supply chain responsibility. We consider a decentralized supply chain where a buyer sources from a financially constrained supplier who borrows from either a bank or the buyer to finance his production. The buyer audits the supplier for responsibility compliance and will refuse to accept and pay for the order if the supplier fails the audit. We find that under conventional bank financing, the bank is concerned with the supplier's audit failure and will raise the interest rate. This not only hinders the supplier's compliance effort but also hurts the profitability of every stakeholder. In contrast, under buyer financing, the buyer may offer the supplier a low interest rate to motivate him to be more compliant when the supplier's collateral is of low value. However, if the supplier's collateral is of high value, the buyer may be tempted to set a high interest rate to exploit the supplier—leading to a reduction in supplier's compliance and supply chain profitability. Thus, we conclude that buyer (bank) financing is more preferable for encouraging responsibility when the supplier has low (high) collateral. Our findings suggest that buyer financing may not always be an effective approach for encouraging supply chain responsibility. As such, we propose an alternative mechanism under which the buyer offers a reward to the supplier if he passes the audit while the supplier continues to borrow from a bank. We prove that this combination of bank financing and buyer reward always improves the compliance level and in most cases increases the total supply chain profit. It is even more effective than buyer financing in encouraging responsibility especially when the supplier's collateral is of low value.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Companies have increasingly used supply chain financing instead of bank financing when engaging with financially constrained suppliers. We investigate the effectiveness of different financing mechanisms at supporting supply chain responsibility. We consider a decentralized supply chain where a buyer sources from a financially constrained supplier who borrows from either a bank or the buyer to finance his production. The buyer audits the supplier for responsibility compliance and will refuse to accept and pay for the order if the supplier fails the audit. We find that under conventional bank financing, the bank is concerned with the supplier's audit failure and will raise the interest rate. This not only hinders the supplier's compliance effort but also hurts the profitability of every stakeholder. In contrast, under buyer financing, the buyer may offer the supplier a low interest rate to motivate him to be more compliant when the supplier's collateral is of low value. However, if the supplier's collateral is of high value, the buyer may be tempted to set a high interest rate to exploit the supplier—leading to a reduction in supplier's compliance and supply chain profitability. Thus, we conclude that buyer (bank) financing is more preferable for encouraging responsibility when the supplier has low (high) collateral. Our findings suggest that buyer financing may not always be an effective approach for encouraging supply chain responsibility. As such, we propose an alternative mechanism under which the buyer offers a reward to the supplier if he passes the audit while the supplier continues to borrow from a bank. We prove that this combination of bank financing and buyer reward always improves the compliance level and in most cases increases the total supply chain profit. It is even more effective than buyer financing in encouraging responsibility especially when the supplier's collateral is of low value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小企业负责任生产的供应链短期融资
在与资金紧张的供应商打交道时,企业越来越多地使用供应链融资而不是银行融资。我们研究了不同融资机制在支持供应链责任方面的有效性。我们考虑一个分散的供应链,其中买方从资金受限的供应商处采购,供应商从银行或买方处借款以资助其生产。买方对供应商的责任符合性进行审核,如果供应商审核不合格,买方将拒绝接受订单并拒绝付款。我们发现,在传统的银行融资中,银行担心供应商的审计失败,会提高利率。这不仅阻碍了供应商的合规努力,也损害了每个利益相关者的盈利能力。相比之下,在买方融资下,当供应商的抵押品价值较低时,买方可能会向供应商提供较低的利率,以激励供应商更顺从。然而,如果供应商的抵押品是高价值的,买方可能会试图设定一个高利率来剥削供应商,从而导致供应商的合规性和供应链盈利能力的降低。因此,我们得出结论,当供应商具有低(高)抵押时,买方(银行)融资更有利于鼓励责任。我们的研究结果表明,买方融资可能并不总是鼓励供应链责任的有效方法。因此,我们提出了一种替代机制,在这种机制下,如果买方通过了审计,而供应商继续从银行借款,则买方向供应商提供奖励。我们证明了这种银行融资和买方奖励的结合总是提高合规水平,在大多数情况下增加了供应链的总利润。它甚至比买方融资在鼓励责任方面更有效,特别是当供应商的抵押品价值较低时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
期刊最新文献
Complementarity analysis of a multi‐item inventory model with leading product pricing The impact of COVID‐19 on supply chain credit risk Physician Practice Migration and Changes in Practice Style: An Empirical Analysis of Inappropriate Diagnostic Imaging in Primary Care Extraction of visual information to predict crowdfunding success Supply chain short‐term financing for responsible production at small and medium‐sized enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1