Ionospheric TEC prediction using FFNN during five different X Class solar flares of 2021 and 2022 and comparison with COKSM and IRI PLAS 2017

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Applied Geodesy Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1515/jag-2023-0057
Sarat C. Dass, Raju Mukesh, Muthuvelan Vijay, Sivavadivel Kiruthiga, Shunmugam Mythili
{"title":"Ionospheric TEC prediction using FFNN during five different X Class solar flares of 2021 and 2022 and comparison with COKSM and IRI PLAS 2017","authors":"Sarat C. Dass, Raju Mukesh, Muthuvelan Vijay, Sivavadivel Kiruthiga, Shunmugam Mythili","doi":"10.1515/jag-2023-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) measured in the ray path of the signals directly contributes to the Range Error (RE) of the satellite signals, which affects positioning and navigation. Employing the Co-Kriging-based Surrogate Model (COKSM) to predict TEC and RE correction has proven prolific. This research attempted to test and compare the prediction capability of COKSM with an Artificial Intelligence-based Feed Forward Neural Network model (FFNN) during five X-Class Solar Flares of 2021–22. Also, the results are validated by comparing them with the IRI PLAS 2017 model. TEC, solar, and geomagnetic parameters data for Hyderabad GPS station located at 17.31° N latitude and 78.55° E longitude were collected from IONOLAB & OMNIWEB servers. The COKSM uses six days of input data to predict the 7th day TEC, whereas prediction using the FFNN model is done using 45 days of data before the prediction date. The performance evaluation is done using RMSE, NRMSE, Correlation Coefficient, and sMAPE. The average RMSE for COKSM varied from 1.9 to 9.05, for FFNN it varied from 2.72 to 7.69, and for IRI PLAS 2017 it varied from 7.39 to 11.24. Likewise, evaluation done for three different models over five different X-class solar flare events showed that the COKSM performed well during the high-intensity solar flare conditions. On the other hand, the FFNN model performed well during high-resolution input data conditions. Also, it is notable that both models performed better than the IRI PLAS 2017 model and are suitable for navigational applications.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) measured in the ray path of the signals directly contributes to the Range Error (RE) of the satellite signals, which affects positioning and navigation. Employing the Co-Kriging-based Surrogate Model (COKSM) to predict TEC and RE correction has proven prolific. This research attempted to test and compare the prediction capability of COKSM with an Artificial Intelligence-based Feed Forward Neural Network model (FFNN) during five X-Class Solar Flares of 2021–22. Also, the results are validated by comparing them with the IRI PLAS 2017 model. TEC, solar, and geomagnetic parameters data for Hyderabad GPS station located at 17.31° N latitude and 78.55° E longitude were collected from IONOLAB & OMNIWEB servers. The COKSM uses six days of input data to predict the 7th day TEC, whereas prediction using the FFNN model is done using 45 days of data before the prediction date. The performance evaluation is done using RMSE, NRMSE, Correlation Coefficient, and sMAPE. The average RMSE for COKSM varied from 1.9 to 9.05, for FFNN it varied from 2.72 to 7.69, and for IRI PLAS 2017 it varied from 7.39 to 11.24. Likewise, evaluation done for three different models over five different X-class solar flare events showed that the COKSM performed well during the high-intensity solar flare conditions. On the other hand, the FFNN model performed well during high-resolution input data conditions. Also, it is notable that both models performed better than the IRI PLAS 2017 model and are suitable for navigational applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用FFNN预测2021年和2022年5次不同X级太阳耀斑的电离层TEC,并与COKSM和IRI PLAS 2017进行比较
电离层总电子含量(TEC)直接影响卫星信号的距离误差(RE),影响卫星的定位和导航。采用基于co - kriging的代理模型(COKSM)预测TEC和RE校正已被证明是丰富的。本研究试图测试COKSM与基于人工智能的前馈神经网络模型(FFNN)对2021 - 2022年5次x级太阳耀斑的预测能力并进行比较。此外,通过与IRI PLAS 2017模型进行比较,验证了结果。位于北纬17.31°和东经78.55°的海德拉巴GPS站的TEC、太阳和地磁参数数据采集自IONOLAB &OMNIWEB服务器。COKSM使用6天的输入数据来预测第7天的TEC,而使用FFNN模型的预测是使用预测日期前45天的数据完成的。使用RMSE、NRMSE、相关系数和sMAPE进行性能评估。COKSM的平均RMSE范围为1.9 ~ 9.05,FFNN的平均RMSE范围为2.72 ~ 7.69,IRI PLAS 2017的平均RMSE范围为7.39 ~ 11.24。同样,在5个不同的x级太阳耀斑事件中对3种不同模型进行了评估,结果表明COKSM在高强度太阳耀斑条件下表现良好。另一方面,FFNN模型在高分辨率输入数据条件下表现良好。此外,值得注意的是,这两种模型的性能都优于IRI PLAS 2017模型,适用于导航应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Occurrence characteristics of ionospheric scintillations in the civilian GPS signals (L1, L2, and L5) through a dedicated scintillation monitoring receiver at a low-latitude location in India during the 25th solar cycle A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service Monitoring of a rockfill embankment dam using TLS and sUAS point clouds Analyzing recent deformation in Wadi Hagul, Eastern Desert, Egypt, via advanced remote sensing and geodetic data processing Regional evaluation of global geopotential models and three types of digital elevation models with ground-based gravity and GNSS/levelling data using several techniques over Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1