Knowledge and the New Zealand curriculum ‘refresh’

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Curriculum Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010
Graham McPhail, Barbara Ormond, Alexis Siteine
{"title":"Knowledge and the New Zealand curriculum ‘refresh’","authors":"Graham McPhail, Barbara Ormond, Alexis Siteine","doi":"10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper examines the extent to which there has been a shift towards disciplinary knowledge in recently developed curriculum documents in New Zealand and evaluates whether a new ‘Understand, Know, Do’ structure for the curriculum has the potential to facilitate coherent design of teaching programmes and ‘deep learning’. Using a social realist lens, Bernsteinian theories on knowledge structures and recontextualization, and the principles of a Curriculum Design Coherence Model, the analysis identifies instances of both conceptual coherence and epistemic confusion which raises questions about the underlying principles upon which the curriculum documents are being developed.KEYWORDS: disciplinary knowledgecurriculum designsocial realismrecontextualizationcurriculum design coherence model Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. ‘Te Tiriti o Waitangi (in English, the Treaty of Waitangi), New Zealand’s founding document, was meant to be a partnership between Māori and the British Crown. Although it was intended to create unity, different understandings of the treaty, and breaches of it, have caused conflict. From the 1970s the general public gradually came to know more about the treaty, and efforts to honour the treaty and its principles expanded’ (Orange, Citation2023).2. taonga—a treasure, or anything valued by Māori for example the Māori language.3. te reo—the Māori language.4. tikanga—customary practices.5. mātauranga Māori–Māori knowledge.","PeriodicalId":47817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper examines the extent to which there has been a shift towards disciplinary knowledge in recently developed curriculum documents in New Zealand and evaluates whether a new ‘Understand, Know, Do’ structure for the curriculum has the potential to facilitate coherent design of teaching programmes and ‘deep learning’. Using a social realist lens, Bernsteinian theories on knowledge structures and recontextualization, and the principles of a Curriculum Design Coherence Model, the analysis identifies instances of both conceptual coherence and epistemic confusion which raises questions about the underlying principles upon which the curriculum documents are being developed.KEYWORDS: disciplinary knowledgecurriculum designsocial realismrecontextualizationcurriculum design coherence model Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. ‘Te Tiriti o Waitangi (in English, the Treaty of Waitangi), New Zealand’s founding document, was meant to be a partnership between Māori and the British Crown. Although it was intended to create unity, different understandings of the treaty, and breaches of it, have caused conflict. From the 1970s the general public gradually came to know more about the treaty, and efforts to honour the treaty and its principles expanded’ (Orange, Citation2023).2. taonga—a treasure, or anything valued by Māori for example the Māori language.3. te reo—the Māori language.4. tikanga—customary practices.5. mātauranga Māori–Māori knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识与新西兰课程“更新”
摘要本文考察了新西兰最近开发的课程文件中向学科知识转变的程度,并评估了新的“理解,知道,做”课程结构是否有可能促进教学计划和“深度学习”的连贯设计。利用社会现实主义的视角,伯恩斯坦关于知识结构和重新语境化的理论,以及课程设计一致性模型的原则,分析确定了概念一致性和认知混淆的实例,这些实例提出了关于课程文件开发所依据的基本原则的问题。关键词:学科知识课程设计社会现实主义再语境化课程设计连贯性模型披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。新西兰的建国文件《怀唐伊条约》(the Tiriti o Waitangi,英文为《怀唐伊条约》)是Māori和英国王室之间的合作文件。虽然它的目的是建立统一,但对条约的不同理解和违反条约的行为引发了冲突。从20世纪70年代开始,公众逐渐对条约有了更多的了解,尊重条约及其原则的努力也扩大了”(Orange, Citation2023)。淘宝——宝藏,或任何有Māori价值的东西,例如Māori语言。4.使用Māori语言。tikanga-customary practices.5。mātauranga Māori-Māori知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Journal of Curriculum Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Curriculum Studies publishes conceptually rich contributions to all areas of curriculum studies, including those derived from empirical, philosophical, sociological, or policy-related investigations. The journal welcomes innovative papers that analyse the ways in which the social and institutional conditions of education and schooling contribute to shaping curriculum, including political, social and cultural studies; education policy; school reform and leadership; teaching; teacher education; curriculum development; and assessment and accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies does not subscribe to any particular methodology or theory. As the prime international source for curriculum research, the journal publishes papers accessible to all the national, cultural, and discipline-defined communities that form the readership.
期刊最新文献
Materialities of progressive curriculum reform: a case study of one kindergarten classroom Situating potentially and kinetically powerful knowledges: the power of meaning-making and social change The palimpsests of knowledge Principals’ conceptions of mathematics instruction: Co-constructing sophisticated instructional vision through professional development Alignment thinking and complementary curriculum: a qualitative study addressing the urgent need for environmental education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1