An E-survey study protocol for the perception of African healthcare professionals on the intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus

Djabo Eric Adrien Tangmi, Voufo Jolyvette Mbougo, Abdulbasit Opeyemi Muili, Ngassam Fustel Valmy Tchato, Ahmed Naeem, Jonas Lotanna Ibekwe, Marwa SaedAli Emhemed, Chukwebuka Stanley Asogwa, Victor Meza Kyaruzi
{"title":"An E-survey study protocol for the perception of African healthcare professionals on the intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus","authors":"Djabo Eric Adrien Tangmi, Voufo Jolyvette Mbougo, Abdulbasit Opeyemi Muili, Ngassam Fustel Valmy Tchato, Ahmed Naeem, Jonas Lotanna Ibekwe, Marwa SaedAli Emhemed, Chukwebuka Stanley Asogwa, Victor Meza Kyaruzi","doi":"10.1093/jsprm/snad008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Tetanus remains a public health neuroinfectious burden in Africa, accounting for the long stay in hospitals. For the past two decades, intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum has been described by several meta-analyses as the therapy for the treatment of tetanus with the best outcome. Particularly with neonatal tetanus, but in Africa, the reality faced by healthcare professionals is in contradiction to the literature. This study aims to assess the perception of healthcare professionals regarding the intrathecal administration of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus, to decide on which action to undertake to preserve patients’ health. Methodology Data will be collected through a self-administered Qualtrics questionnaire from a Qualtrics account. The minimum and maximum sample sizes calculated were, respectively, 384 and 426. Anonymous links to the three versions of the questionnaire will be disseminated from 15 May 2023 to 15 July 2023, through mobile phones, social media (WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Telegram) and e-mail. Ata shall be analyzed with SPSS version 26 (IBM, WA, USA). The analyzed data will be presented as frequency tables and charts. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals, Chi-Square test and analysis of variance will be used to test for associations between independent and dependent variables. A P-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Dissemination Our study findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and the abstract will be presented at an international conference.","PeriodicalId":93590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snad008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Tetanus remains a public health neuroinfectious burden in Africa, accounting for the long stay in hospitals. For the past two decades, intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum has been described by several meta-analyses as the therapy for the treatment of tetanus with the best outcome. Particularly with neonatal tetanus, but in Africa, the reality faced by healthcare professionals is in contradiction to the literature. This study aims to assess the perception of healthcare professionals regarding the intrathecal administration of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus, to decide on which action to undertake to preserve patients’ health. Methodology Data will be collected through a self-administered Qualtrics questionnaire from a Qualtrics account. The minimum and maximum sample sizes calculated were, respectively, 384 and 426. Anonymous links to the three versions of the questionnaire will be disseminated from 15 May 2023 to 15 July 2023, through mobile phones, social media (WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Telegram) and e-mail. Ata shall be analyzed with SPSS version 26 (IBM, WA, USA). The analyzed data will be presented as frequency tables and charts. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals, Chi-Square test and analysis of variance will be used to test for associations between independent and dependent variables. A P-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Dissemination Our study findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and the abstract will be presented at an international conference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于非洲卫生保健专业人员对治疗破伤风的鞘内注射抗破伤风血清的看法的电子调查研究方案
背景破伤风仍然是非洲的一种公共卫生神经感染性负担,导致住院时间长。在过去的二十年中,一些荟萃分析已将鞘内注射抗破伤风血清描述为治疗破伤风的最佳治疗方法。特别是新生儿破伤风,但在非洲,卫生保健专业人员面临的现实是矛盾的文献。本研究旨在评估卫生保健专业人员对治疗破伤风的鞘内注射抗破伤风血清的看法,以决定采取何种行动来保护患者的健康。数据将通过Qualtrics帐户的自我管理的Qualtrics问卷收集。计算的最小样本量为384,最大样本量为426。三个版本问卷的匿名链接将于2023年5月15日至2023年7月15日期间通过手机、社交媒体(WhatsApp、LinkedIn、Telegram)和电子邮件传播。Ata采用SPSS version 26 (IBM, WA, USA)进行分析。分析后的数据将以频率表和图表的形式呈现。比值比及其95%置信区间、卡方检验和方差分析将用于检验自变量和因变量之间的关联。p值<0.05将被认为具有统计学意义。我们的研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,摘要将在国际会议上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microvascular density and vasculogenic mimicry the predictive signatures of prognosis and therapeutic response in gliomas—a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Assessing the therapeutic potential of dendritic cell vaccine in glioblastoma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol Protocol for a systematic review of the management and outcomes in patients with gallbladder agenesis Patient Registry of Upper Limb Outcomes (PRULO): a protocol for an orthopaedic clinical quality registry to monitor treatment outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1