Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol

Thomas Sardesai, Laura Hobbs, Caroline Phillips, Tom Bashford, Katharina Kohler, Daniel Stubbs
{"title":"Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol","authors":"Thomas Sardesai, Laura Hobbs, Caroline Phillips, Tom Bashford, Katharina Kohler, Daniel Stubbs","doi":"10.1093/jsprm/snae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.","PeriodicalId":93590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","volume":"288 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究预测手术当天取消手术(DOSC)的工作:系统性审查协议
全球约有 18% 的择期手术会在手术当天取消。这影响了患者的身体健康、心理健康和社会功能。进一步的影响包括降低医疗服务效率和更广泛的经济生产力。导致这一现象的变量有很多,包括患者因素、资源限制和医疗服务压力,这些都可以纳入预测模型。本文介绍了一项系统性综述的协议,以评估经同行评审的原创研究文章和预测 DOSC 模型的实施研究。此类统计模型如果能恰当地融入临床实践,将为患者和医疗服务提供者带来益处。该系统性综述将对这一领域的证据进行全面综合,为今后建立黄金标准统计模型提供参考。预测因子查找研究、同一模型的后续出版物以及未披露预测变量的出版物将被排除在外。将在 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of science 中进行检索。将使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具对偏倚风险进行评估。将收集有关所含变量、预测方法、预测是在患者层面还是在系统层面进行以及培训和评估过程的数据。这些数据将进行定性综合,并用于生成叙述性摘要和图表。本系统综述将遵守 2020 年 PRISMA 指南。本综述已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42023478984。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microvascular density and vasculogenic mimicry the predictive signatures of prognosis and therapeutic response in gliomas—a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Assessing the therapeutic potential of dendritic cell vaccine in glioblastoma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol Protocol for a systematic review of the management and outcomes in patients with gallbladder agenesis Patient Registry of Upper Limb Outcomes (PRULO): a protocol for an orthopaedic clinical quality registry to monitor treatment outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1